Originally posted by blugiant
View Post
Also, don't confuse slavery in Bible times with what we know as slavery in the Caribbean. It was closer to indentured servitude and in many instances voluntary to a degree....which doesn't make it any more palatable.....but it was different.
Reminds me of what used to happen here in Toronto. Impoverished White families with lots of children would have their oldest daughter work as a servant for rich families from the age of 13. I forget what the position was called. The conditions were harsh. If you go to Casa Loma, for example, you can see the tiny rooms in which they stayed. The young girl would have to be up before everyone to light the fires in the fireplaces in all the rooms and she would be the last one to bed as she would be stuck washing all of the pots, a nasty job that no one else wanted to do. Pay was low, she would get very little sleep but compared to staying at home at least she would be guaranteed 3 meals, a day her own bed, and not having to live in a rat infested hovel. Which was better? Neither choice was palatable but these were the realities. This was during the 1920s, not thousands of years ago...not sure when these conditions ended. Of course we also know that immigrants ended up working as domestic servants in Canada and NUFF Jamaican women came to Canada under what was called "the domestic scheme".
Same thing happened in England. People were time limited "in servitude" to escape poverty or as a punishment for crimes. Some pirates ended up in the Caribbean as indentured servants while the others from their vessel were strung up on the gallows. For sure this type of servitude continued into the 1920s and 1930s. We've all seen Downton Abbey and Gosford Park. Not sure when it officially ended but there is evidence that it still continues in the UK in some form.
and
and this
In June (2011), the UK government abstained from the ILO Convention on Decent Work for Domestic Workers, joining Sudan, Panama, El Salvador, Malaysia, Singapore, the Czech Republic and Thailand. Ashamed that the government would choose such allies to help their attempt to frustrate effective protection of basic employment rights for this group of workers around the world, I called a debate in parliament. In that debate, employment relations minister Ed Davey argued that the convention was not needed in the UK, as we already have a legal framework of employment rights and protections for domestic workers.
That is exactly what Moses did in Leviticus...the book of law for the Jewish nation.
I notice that you and some other members of the Koolaid Krew expect perfection. Newsflash
it ain't going to happen any time soon. Good luck trying to find it. Reminds me of the hive mind among the Borg collective on Star Trek.
Comment