Tweet
well it doesn't sound like they were awful parents. The other parent need to stop interfering with the people dem family.
-
-
i think is politics and the fren father jus using the daughter as pawnOriginally posted by CeaBee View PostWhen its hot in the jungle of peace I go swimming in the ocean of love.....Comment
-
I think DYFS will investigate the Inglesino's next as dem is rumoured to have alcoholic parties for their teens..
I can hear the kids now 'The parents were monitoring the drinks'
If you don't fight for what you deserve, you deserve what you get.
We are > Fossil Fuels --- Bill McKibben 350.orgComment
-
meeda like si a pickney in Jamaica try dis
on second thought, no I wouldn't
Comment
-
I think this child needed to do community service, not with her dad in Mt Olive but in South Jersey with people who are so impoverished they live in trailers. In the affidavit she had to do community service during her school suspension and within the hour of arrival at her suspension job, the boyfriend picked her up and took her to his house. His mother then called her mother asking Rachel (the teen's mother) to let the school know it is ok for her to stay at the boyfriends houseOriginally posted by Peasie View Postmeeda like si a pickney in Jamaica try dis
on second thought, no I wouldn't
If you don't fight for what you deserve, you deserve what you get.
We are > Fossil Fuels --- Bill McKibben 350.orgComment
-
dis is definitely first world entitlement problems.
di pickney clearly spoiled and maybe because she spoiled and di fact she do good in school, she feel like she can bruk out.
she need to see examples of real mental and emotional abuse - although overindulgence can be considered some kinda abuse.
she want a reality checkComment
-
Maybe something more like a Jerry Springer spot.Originally posted by missus_vegas View Postshe is pretty so she mite get a reality tv show out of it
Comment
-
da brat woo sued ar parents
EXCLUSIVE: The brat is back! Spoiled cheerleader Rachel Canning pictured partying weeks after moving back home - with the very boyfriend her parents banned her from seeing
Rachel, 18, posted a string of pictures on Facebook last week at her wild high school blow out
The senior had sued her parents who banned her from seeing her boyfriend who they blamed for leading her astray
They were worried she was drinking too much. She refused to live at home and abide by their rules and sued them
But she is pictured at the high-octane party where her boyfriend was too
She was no doubt celebrating securing a $56,000 college scholarship
Spoiled teen Rachel Canning may have abandoned her controversial legal battle to sue her parents, but she has not given up on her party lifestyle - or the boyfriend her mom and dad banned her from seeing.
The cheerleader – who made international headlines after she took her parents to court to accuse them of abandoning her – posted a string of pictures on her public Facebook page last week showing her at a wild high school blowout.
In some of the snaps - contained in an album called, 'Seniors' - Rachel, 18, is seen clutching a plastic cup and in one ‘action shot’ she is shown taking a huge swig.
The teen is pictured with a number of different boys – planting a kiss on one – but more importantly her boyfriend Lucas Kitzmiller features in one of the images.
Rachel’s parents Sean and Elizabeth - who have easy access to the snaps - expressly banned her from seeing Lucas, 18, after they accused him of leading their daughter astray and making her, ‘obsessed with drinking every weekend’.
In fact her drinking and her relationship with Lucas were the main reasons for the explosive fall out experienced by the Cannings. Last November, soon after moving out of the family home in Lincoln Park, New Jersey, Rachel sent her father an email saying she was ready to come back.
Sean, a former police chief, responded, writing: ‘As far as the boyfriend, yeah, you might not agree and sure you don't but that has been as much a drag on you as anything, if you're home he's not around or involved in your life.'
Furious Rachel responded 'Well I'm not coming home if I can't see him'. That was their last correspondence until they met in Morris County Court on March 5.
Between those dates Rachel lived at the home of her best friend’s father, John Inglesino, a high powered lawyer who actually funded her legal battle.
In the lawsuit, Sean and Elizabeth were accused of abandoning their daughter and told they needed to pay for her private school tuition, her university fees and her legal bills.
Their counter argument centered on Rachel’s drinking and her relationship with Lucas. In incendiary court papers, Elizabeth laid into her daughter, Lucas and even his parents.
She wrote: ‘Prior her dating him, Rachel had been dating another boy through the summer of 2013 where they rarely, if ever engaged in the heavy partying that was being exhibited nonstop in the fall of 2013.
‘She (Rachel) was routinely bought home drunk by the Kitzmillers, well past her curfew…
‘In ignoring our very lenient rules and curfews, it became the normal fashion on weekends for Lucas’ father or mother to drive Lucas and Rachel home from whatever party they were able to find around the country.’
Referencing one particular incident, she said: ‘On that particular night Lucas’ father drove her home drunk and dropped her off at our home at 3.30am.’
Lucas also faced the brunt of the Canning family anger when it came to her disciplinary problems at school.
Elizabeth said he was present when Rachel was suspended from Morris Catholic High School, explaining: ‘Upon Rachel’s return to school (following a first suspension) she cut school with Lucas Kitzmiller and called into school herself purporting to be me.
‘On October 29, 2014 the night before she left, we had told her she could no longer see her boyfriend due to the suspension and his poor influence on her and we took away her phone and car privileges.
‘Upon suspension, she attended work with her father… Despite our having imposed a punishment for the suspension she was picked up by her unsupervised and also suspended boyfriend, Lucas Kitzmiller… within an hour of arriving there…. She went to the Kitzmiller’s home.
‘Mrs Kitzmiller contacted me at work stating that she had both Rachel and her son, Lucas, at her house and that for the sake of our children, that I needed to contact Morris Catholic and tell them that Rachel had my permission to be at her house.
‘I vociferously refused to comply with this and indicated to Mrs. Kitzmiller that they needed to be accountable for their actions…
‘I was attempting to exert moral legal parental authority over daughter despite the enabling and parental interfering behavior of Mrs. Kitzmiller, which undermined our parenting and rules.’
Those statements led to a war of words between the Cannings and the Kitzmillers. Speaking to MailOnline last month Lucas’ dad Jeffery said: ‘My son has been painted in a questionable light by some of the comments from the Cannings.
'Their only experience of him is that he met the father long enough to shake hands. That's the only interaction they have ever had. They made their decision about him from that.
'If you read the court papers you can see the trend is with every boyfriend she's had it's always the boyfriend who's the bad influence. We have been dragged into this.’
But it seems that bad blood has not changed Rachel and Lucas' feeling towards each other.
Following months of recriminations the case went to court and Judge Peter Bogaard made it immediately clear that he was not sympathetic to Rachel’s arguments.
After reading an expletive-laden and vicious answerphone message left by Rachel Canning to Elizabeth, in which the girl said: 'I wanna s*** all over your face', he said: 'Have you ever in your experience seen such gross disrespect for a parent? I don’t see it in my house.’
The judge added that Rachel had given her mom and dad: ‘The proverbial f you’. He also warned he must consider the 'slippery slope' where 'we open the gates for a 12-year-old to sue for an Xbox, a 13-year-old to sue for an iPhone… what about a 15-year-old asking for a 60 inch TV?'
Seemingly realizing she was fighting a losing battle Rachel agreed to move back into her parents’ house the following week and dropped the lawsuit.
But if her Facebook pictures are anything to go by she has not changed her lifestyle and is still hanging out with Lucas, something which is sure to anger her parents.
On top of that it seems she has also got her parents to agree to part-fund her college education, the main reason for launching the lawsuit.
Rachel announced on her Facebook page in a public post on March 29 that she plans to attend Western New England University as a biomedical engineering major on a $56,000 scholarship.
She wrote: ‘Decision made. WNE U class of 2018 BME Major w/ 56,000$ scholarship.’
A Western New England spokesman confirmed to the Daily Record that Canning was accepted into the private school in Massachusetts.
In an email to USA Today, they added: ‘Western New England University routinely offers merit scholarships to incoming freshmen based on academic achievement. ... These merit scholarships can total between $22,000 and $66,000 over the course of four years.’
One year of tuition at the school for an undergraduate engineering student is $32,606, and room and board is an additional $12,700, according to the university website.
Comment
-
suh 56,000 over 4 years, that leaves a diff of 30K a year to pay for ??
hope her parents tek dem college fund and guh pan a round the world cruise.Comment
-
Actually the parents were awful because they never set any ground rules for her until it was too late. She's not going to change at age 18, that's for sure.Originally posted by CeaBee View PostComment
Comment