mi miss oonuh a day time

[missus_vegas]

but mi deh pan heavy surveillance


some idiat man a mi werk go download porn pan di ppl dem computer. plus he made a cd of it and confused it with some work related files so everybaddy unda heavy watch.dem all gi wi papa fi sign seh wi understand seh dem is monitoring our activities and ray ray ray...

lawd mi never know mi was addicted to di board till now. lawd mi cyan wait till dis wear aff so mi can come back.

neways....enjoy oonuh freedom to roam di www dot
funny ting...all of a sudden i fine so many "projects" to do dat mi never tink of doing before if dis keeps up dam...effeciency should go up 110% cus obviously a no me one have lots more time to actually do work

[countryspeng]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time




fi ol times sake....

[dr. bones]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

Your co-worker has probs. Did they fire him?

My boss is cool , so I can idle all day. The board has been slow lately, so you probably won't miss much.

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

See if Vegas wasn't such a &quot;B&quot; werd <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Click to reveal.. <input type="button" class="form-button" value="Show me!" onclick="toggle_spoiler(this, 'Yikes, my eyes!', 'Show me!')" /></div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div style="display: none;">BRAT </div></div></div> I would email her the suss on a regular basis

[nattydreadgirl]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dr. bones</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your co-worker has probs. Did they fire him?

My boss is cool , so I can idle all day. The board has been slow lately, so you probably won't miss much. </div></div>

[julie*mango]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

and wi nuh miss yu a daytime so it balance out

[Bandana]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lawd_SPENG_aggen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">


fi ol times sake.... </div></div>

be careful Speng

is not you who say dem escort someone out of the office yesterday for porn??

Dem soon send the memo dat you being monitored...

[countryspeng]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BanDanna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lawd_SPENG_aggen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">


fi ol times sake.... </div></div>

be careful Speng

is not you who say dem escort someone out of the office yesterday for porn??

Dem soon send the memo dat you being monitored...

</div></div>

I know we are being monitored......good thing about my job...no overkill....everything dealt with case by case....

[missus_vegas]

Re: mi miss oonuh a day time

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nattydreadgirl</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dr. bones</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your co-worker has probs. Did they fire him?

My boss is cool , so I can idle all day. The board has been slow lately, so you probably won't miss much. </div></div>

</div></div>

no body get fired.they trytin to keep it all hush hush but mi know is who bcus my office inna mgmt corner an dem dont know how to whisper or close doors...i think sometimes they forget that i am the only non mgmt person around there.

plus di man weh do it had di nerve fi go inna di vp office and mi hear him a argue bout seh him nah sign no paper and privacy and ray ray and wat him do pan lunch break is not company bizniz...

i am sitting there like hello...loser ur on company property...neways its a small office and is only one odda person in di office do di same work as him so i tink dat may be a factor...plus him and di next man weh him werk wid kinda strange so maybe is di two a dem doing it.

dem never go out fi lunch yet. evry day dem fasten behind di computer...all wen di boss invite everybaddy fi lunch di man in question decline...now mi know y.

him two yeye dem soon drap out nasty and u fi si him to

[diabolical_Tanya]

Vegas print dis off an give yu boss

SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal appeals court has made it more difficult for employers to snoop legally on e-mails and text messages their workers send from company accounts.

Under Wednesday's ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, employers that contract an outside business to transmit text messages can't read them unless the worker agrees.

Users of text-messaging services &quot;have a reasonable expectation of privacy&quot; regarding messages stored on the service provider's network, Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote in the three-judge panel's unanimous opinion.

The ruling limits employers' access to employee e-mail on internal servers.

The text-message part of the ruling will affect more employers than the e-mail portion because most U.S. companies pay outside parties for text-messaging but keep e-mail on internal servers, analysts said.

The judges had few precedents, Wardlaw acknowledged in the ruling.

&quot;The extent to which the Fourth Amendment provides protection for the contents of electronic communications in the Internet Age is an open question,&quot; she wrote.

A civil liberties advocacy group called the ruling a &quot;tremendous victory&quot; for online privacy. The Electronic Frontier Foundation said in a posting online that the ruling helps ensure the Fourth Amendment &quot;applies to your communications online just as strongly as it does to packages and letters.&quot;

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by Ontario police Sgt. Jeff Quon and three other officers after Arch Wireless gave their department transcripts of Quon's text messages in 2002. Police officials read the messages to determine whether department-issued pagers were being used solely for work purposes.

&quot;I think right now service providers are going to be a little leery of providing anything to the subscriber because of this case,&quot; said John Horowitz, a lawyer representing Arch Wireless.

Dimitrios Rinos, an attorney for the city of Ontario and its police department, said his clients probably will appeal the ruling.