Re: How Many is too Many?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tulip</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While I admit 96 sounds excessive, my major concern would be about diseases.
I think I have been asked that question only once after I turned 21, and I answered it honestly. I wasn't keeping count so I had to think about it first.
I don't get the obsession with the numbers and ratings. Is it supposed to be a moral gauge for the potential of future promiscuity? <span style="font-weight: bold">I'm kind of a fan of men who were promiscuous; they tend to be much more fun and less "can't do this and I don't do that" in bed.</span> </div></div>
hmmmmnnn neda wan a dem <span style="text-decoration: line-through">double</span> different standards
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tulip</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While I admit 96 sounds excessive, my major concern would be about diseases.
I think I have been asked that question only once after I turned 21, and I answered it honestly. I wasn't keeping count so I had to think about it first.
I don't get the obsession with the numbers and ratings. Is it supposed to be a moral gauge for the potential of future promiscuity? <span style="font-weight: bold">I'm kind of a fan of men who were promiscuous; they tend to be much more fun and less "can't do this and I don't do that" in bed.</span> </div></div>
hmmmmnnn neda wan a dem <span style="text-decoration: line-through">double</span> different standards
</div></div>



Comment