Ho vs Playboy

[julie*mango]

Is there a difference between being sexually liberated versus just being a plain ole nasty ho?

Mi know some woman loose but di terminalagy used fi describe them is disparaging compared to those used to describe a man who sleeps around.

[BlessedLadyOfZion]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

yes

[BlessedLadyOfZion]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

oh play boy as in man ho...mi did tink a playboy as in hugh hef [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70361-embarassed.gif[/img]

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Skelli0n</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is there a difference between being sexually liberated versus just being a plain ole nasty ho?

Mi know some woman loose but di terminalagy used fi describe them is disparaging compared to those used to describe a man who sleeps around.

</div></div>break it down fimmie please, because clearly what me tink is not "the right" [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img]

But then I know porn stars who have only ever slept with one man...her husband [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif[/img] and I know preachers wives who have slept with hundreds before she got "saved"

[julie*mango]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

woman who sleep around plenty = ho

man who sleep around plenty = playboy

question is can women enjoy sexual liberties as men do without attaching some negative term such as ho?

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Skelli0n</div><div class="ubbcode-body">woman who sleep around plenty = ho

man who sleep around plenty = playboy

question is can women enjoy sexual liberties as men do without attaching some negative term such as ho? </div></div>if they are discreet about it yes they can [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70409-waytogo.gif[/img]

[turtledude]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Empress_Aynat</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Skelli0n</div><div class="ubbcode-body">woman who sleep around plenty = ho

man who sleep around plenty = playboy

question is can women enjoy sexual liberties as men do without attaching some negative term such as ho? </div></div>if they are discreet about it yes they can [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70409-waytogo.gif[/img] </div></div>

Good question, with no answer that I can figure. How would you classify Paris Hilton?....who's independently wealthy AND indescreet. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif[/img]

[Suesumba]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turtledude</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Good question, with no answer that I can figure. How would you classify Paris Hilton?....who's independently wealthy AND indescreet. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif[/img] </div></div>

the correct answer to that would be stupid! and i hate calling people stupid. but stupid is as stupid does.

as long as you have both male/female genders, there'll always be gender inequality. women disparage other women as being whore/sluts if they happen to be strippers. no different i'm sure from the old burlesque days when dancing was actually an art form.

men will think that a woman who strips, for eg. is easier than *normal* women just because of what she does.

the sexuality of men is not held up to scrutiny as that of women. for men it's a numbers game. "sow wild oats" [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] and all that. so a man whose slept with a variety of women - even if they're paid escorts is a "playboy" [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img]

[jah_yout]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

'girls you can't do what the guys do, no
and still be a lady
nohoo you can't do what the guys do
and still be a lady'

[Seveen]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body">'girls you can't do what the guys do, no
and still be a lady
nohoo you can't do what the guys do
and still be a lady' </div></div>

i'm in recovery [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img]

[turtledude]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

yea, you are right, Sue......I think the problem comes about, around the time of puberty when boys see their mother having a conversation with the teenage girl next door. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/wink.gif[/img]

[blugiant]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MadAtYou</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is there a difference between being sexually liberated versus just being a plain ole nasty ho?

Mi know some woman loose but di terminalagy used fi describe them is disparaging compared to those used to describe a man who sleeps around.

</div></div>

deer iss a bigg diffanant between oomen ann men wey ave latt aff sexual partners.

y oomen like fii gawn like men ann oomen dat sleep rund ar morallee equivalent

[Suesumba]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">deer iss a bigg diffanant between oomen ann men wey ave latt aff sexual partners.

y oomen like fii gawn like men ann oomen dat sleep rund ar morallee equivalent </div></div>

you're right. men that sleep around are noble and their behaviours should be widely emulated and accepted. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70459-hugs.gif[/img]

women who sleep around should be shunned if not stoned to death. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif[/img]

[blugiant]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">deer iss a bigg diffanant between oomen ann men wey ave latt aff sexual partners.

y oomen like fii gawn like men ann oomen dat sleep rund ar morallee equivalent </div></div>

you're right. men that sleep around are noble and their behaviours should be widely emulated and accepted. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70459-hugs.gif[/img]

women who sleep around should be shunned if not stoned to death. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif[/img] </div></div>

wat nobilitee affii doo widd itt men ar juss tekkinn advantage aff da readilee avialable appartunities. cyaan fault a mann fii dat iff imm nah spread noo disease

oomen dat sleep arund show dat dem ave low self esteem. ann suesumba yu knoo dat stones arr fii funneee peeps dat violate da communitee standards

[Suesumba]

Re: Ho vs Playboy

gwan chroo my little firestarter [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70365-flirt.gif[/img]