oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

[blugiant]

yesstiday wen mii a drive mii ear dem ave diss tapixx pon da radio.

oomen woo keep dem children away fram dem fadders. a latt aff oomen like fii use dem yuths fii manipulate dem xx. iff dem doan tink da mann doan give dem enuff money dem keep da yuths fram dem fadders. iff dem doan like dem xx new ooman dem keep da yuths fram dem faddar.

soo cum xxplain too mii y sum oomen tink dem ave da rite fii keep da yuths fram dem faddars

[jah_yout]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

i heard it too...

& all i could say was full time dem address this topic caw dem always gwaan like seh a man alone a gwaan wid armshouse when it come to parenting...

morre fire fi di ooman dem who practice dem ting deh...

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

unno behind di time wid unno tapic eeeeh ALREADY DISCUSSED [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img]

[blugiant]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Empress_Aynat</div><div class="ubbcode-body">unno behind di time wid unno tapic eeeeh ALREADY DISCUSSED [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img] </div></div>

diss annoo baby mamma drama diss iss grow oomen wey tink dem ave awl da rite fii use dem yuths fii manipulate menn. like dem alone create da yuths

oomen like fii blame menn butt dem qwiet bout addar oomen keepinn da yuths fram dem faddar. lang thyme diss a gawn ann itt noo rite

[MrsBlue]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<span style="color: #3333FF">It's not right for either parent to use the child(ren) as a manipulation tool. Women that keep the children from their father solely on the grounds that they are not getting enough money or out of anger at the father are only doing a disservice to the children. Children need their father, need a male role model in their lives. </span>

[Gen]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

manipulate is one thing, but when the woman is the primary care giver and has sole custody, yes she can decide whether or not she want the pickney dem shack up with the puppa & him dif diff oomans dem [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70456-eyebrows.gif[/img]

[MrsBlue]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<span style="color: #3333FF">Family court might not agree. They may feel that the father has visitation rights no matter how many women the father may have or cohabitate with.

At a certain point the mother has to let go and realize that she cannot control what the father does. And that the children will have to see things as they are and not what she or they would like them to be. Whatever differences they may have, including in styles of parenting, the father still has a right to be a father. </span>

[blugiant]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Geneva</div><div class="ubbcode-body">manipulate is one thing, but when the woman is the primary care giver and has sole custody, yes she can decide whether or not she want the pickney dem shack up with the puppa & him dif diff oomans dem [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70456-eyebrows.gif[/img] </div></div>

mii ear sum oomen chatt bout a fii dem yuths soo noobadee, natt even da faddar, cyaan tell dem oww fii raise dem cah itt dem give birth too dem

soo ooman goo shackk upp widd mann ann iff ave diffarant oomen soo den shii tunn rund ann feel a way cah shii doan waan ar yuths rund imm addar oomen

[blugiant]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Blueness</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style="color: #3333FF">Family court might not agree. They may feel that the father has visitation rights no matter how many women the father may have or cohabitate with.

At a certain point the mother has to let go and realize that she cannot control what the father does. And that the children will have to see things as they are and not what she or they would like them to be. Whatever differences they may have, including in styles of parenting, the father still has a right to be a father. </span> </div></div>

family court usuallee rule pon da ooman side cah itt value da maddar ova da faddar widd regard too raisinn yuths

does da faddar reallee ave da rite too bee faddar too imm yuth ar do imm ave da privelege fii doo watt da maddar waan unda da tthreat aff tekkinn imm too familee court fii established dat shii ave more rite fii raise da yuths dan da faddar. since moas ooman caan tekk da faddar too familee court fii chile support, diss show dat de faddar role iss defined bye da ooman ann da court

[jah_yout]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Geneva</div><div class="ubbcode-body">manipulate is one thing, but when the woman is the primary care giver and has sole custody, yes she can decide whether or not she want the pickney dem shack up with the puppa & him dif diff oomans dem [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70456-eyebrows.gif[/img] </div></div>

but can she decide that the youths should never SEE their father?
some women even move out of state and go thru great lengths out of SPITE or BITTERNESS to hurt the man by denying him the right to have some kind of relationship with their child...
more fire!

[Daoud4]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

My reasoning isn't the child support although it's not enough. I could careless about his womenly ways cause my son rarely stay the night with him. The reason why I stopped my son from seeing his father is because he's irresponsible, right after I took him to court he started taking it out on my child. That I can not have. My son said he misses him but not really interested in seeing him anyway. The rare times that he calls for him, about twice in the last year, I let it go to voicemail then delete it.

[Gen]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Geneva</div><div class="ubbcode-body">manipulate is one thing, but when the woman is the primary care giver and has sole custody, yes she can decide whether or not she want the pickney dem shack up with the puppa & him dif diff oomans dem [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70456-eyebrows.gif[/img] </div></div>

but can she decide that the youths should never SEE their father?
some women even move out of state and go thru great lengths out of SPITE or BITTERNESS to hurt the man by denying him the right to have some kind of relationship with their child...
more fire! </div></div>



You are obviously talking about extreme cases. I was just using that as an example of where the father was being irresponsible "in the presence" of the child. There are 2 sides to every custody battle. unnu try memba dat.

I guess I should have clarified up above that it goes both ways, it really boils down to the "interest" of the child.

Mi nevah seh nothing above bout preventing visitation in my prior post suh mi nuh know weh dat a come from.

anyway the chread a get hard fi decipher since blugiant post suh mi can't overstand what a gwaan [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img]

[Hush Darlin]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

so wait if the man nah support the child
the madda fe hunt dung the wukliss man and mek him see the child

[blugiant]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TeeTee</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My reasoning isn't the child support although it's not enough. I could careless about his womenly ways cause my son rarely stay the night with him. The reason why I stopped my son from seeing his father is because he's irresponsible, right after I took him to court he started taking it out on my child. That I can not have. My son said he misses him but not really interested in seeing him anyway. The rare times that he calls for him, about twice in the last year, I let it go to voicemail then delete it. </div></div>

yu knoo itt bout dat money cah dat y moas oomen tekk menn too court ova widd regard too dem yuth. still mii doan like oww sum menn doan mine dem yuths wen dem caan afford itt. dat prablem iss dat sum ooman too greedee fii trii reach campramise widdout goinn too court.

soo yu tekk da mann too court ova oonnoo yuth den imm tunn irrespansible. y iss itt dat oomen tekk mann too court ann doan tink dat imm aggoo react cah imm feel dat imm wass wranged

carefull cah wen yu yuth fine out yu delete faddar message imm miight start fii ole dat against yu fii keepinn imm fram imm faddar. sum time yuth parrot watt dem maddar sey widd regard too dem faddar till dem ole enuff fii challenge wat dem maddar gawn widd

[blugiant]

Re: oomen wey keep yuths fram faddar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SweetSsop</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so wait if the man nah support the child
the madda fe hunt dung the wukliss man and mek him see the child </div></div>

iff da maddar a cawl da faddar wukliss dawg wey nah support imm yuth oww yu xxpekk imm fii bee invalve inna da yuth life. maddar dissinn da yuth faddar leed too self esteem issues