Or should I say products that are marketed to white consumers.
<font color="blue"> This was inspired by JM1's post in GD. </font>
[ QUOTE ]
My friend stopped using "black hair" products and have been using Paul Mitchell and Aveda products on her natural hair and have seen amazing results.
She's been trying to convince me that "hair is hair" and it is the effect of the products "specifically made for and used in black hairs" that is causing massive "differences".
She is convinced that the "black hair care products" are poisonous and a "part of the conspiracy" to keep the koreans and europeans in business...think BIGGEST CONSUMERS.
[/ QUOTE ]
Please share your thoughts/experiences.
~~ Have you ever/do you use products "marketed" for Black hairs ONLY or do you use products that are "marketed" for white hairs ONLY? Do you see/think that there is a differenc? What is the difference?
I am almost sold after seeing her hair. [img]/forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
<font color="blue"> This was inspired by JM1's post in GD. </font>
[ QUOTE ]
My friend stopped using "black hair" products and have been using Paul Mitchell and Aveda products on her natural hair and have seen amazing results.
She's been trying to convince me that "hair is hair" and it is the effect of the products "specifically made for and used in black hairs" that is causing massive "differences".
She is convinced that the "black hair care products" are poisonous and a "part of the conspiracy" to keep the koreans and europeans in business...think BIGGEST CONSUMERS.
[/ QUOTE ]
Please share your thoughts/experiences.
~~ Have you ever/do you use products "marketed" for Black hairs ONLY or do you use products that are "marketed" for white hairs ONLY? Do you see/think that there is a differenc? What is the difference?
I am almost sold after seeing her hair. [img]/forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Comment