wth condi

[twiney]

Re: wth condi

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tulip</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yes, tt is just a bob at the length that it was at various times, but I still think it suits her today. Regardless, it is an improvement over the previous versions. It looks like a professional stylist got in there with some color and a good conditioner to boot.
<span style="font-weight: bold">
Before it looked stiff, brittle, and like she chopped it with garden sheers. </span> </div></div>

OK you all need to stop now

[Gen]

Re: wth condi

precisely. just because she is an accomplished woman nuh mean seh she cannot be critiqued. kmt.
this is not the blasted foreign policy forum.

I've never seen her in an ad before, so I guess my expectations were a bit high.



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Yuri_</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Agreed.

Just from a <span style="font-weight: bold">&quot;style, fashion, aestetic&quot; point of view ... her hair is totally dated</span>. Always has been. RARELY is there any variation on it.

Looks like a school marm. I saw a photo of her with the first Bush from 20+ years ago once - same hairstyle.

Dang! <span style="font-style: italic">Switch it up a bit dawg! </span>

As you say Vegas - same thing with Portia.

Ladies - <span style="font-style: italic">can I get a show of hands is your hairstyle is exactly the same today as it was 25 years ago</span> ... ?
</div></div>

[kia027]

Re: wth condi

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

I've never seen her in an ad before, so I guess my expectations were a bit high.



</div></div>

Yes they were

[CeaBee]

Re: wth condi

no they weren't.

even me would try look little different for my glamour shots.