Re: Does God have a language?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CEW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I agree, but consider that if I take your argument to the logical conclusion, it says that if God has a language it had to be developed from somewhere, or by somebody, or some culture. </div></div>
I agree. No being can just <span style="font-style: italic">know</span> a language a priori. When you say that...
"The problem is you're trying to bring God to the level of humans and saying if the development of language among humans is the product of culture/society, then it must be the same for God. I disagree with that premise primarily because the Christian God we are talking about is said to be omni-everything, and so is not bound by the same limitations, or required prequisites for something to happen, as humans are."
... it would seem to me that there must be some logical limitations on what "omni-everything" means.
Intelligence requires language. Language is a product of society. Therefore, before there were people there were no languages... and no intelligence.
It seems to me that intelligence can't stand by itself. Intelligence can't be static, and postulating a single being that knows everything, and can do everything, is creating an end to knowing. It's a verbal black hole where even though you can say it, when you think about it, it means nothing. Like "eternal life." Nothing is eternal... especially life... and words.
Doesn't being intelligent means having answers? Can you have answers without words going in, and words coming out? I don't think that a feral person could ever be defined as "intelligent."
There was a recent article on the possibilities of "intelligent life" in the universe in the BBC. The scientist, Duncan Forgan says, "If alien life forms do exist, we may not necessarily be able to make contact with them, and we have no idea what form they would take." Link
I think if there is "intelligent life" out there they will have languages. They will be noisy.
I apologize for taking so long to reply.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CEW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I agree, but consider that if I take your argument to the logical conclusion, it says that if God has a language it had to be developed from somewhere, or by somebody, or some culture. </div></div>
I agree. No being can just <span style="font-style: italic">know</span> a language a priori. When you say that...
"The problem is you're trying to bring God to the level of humans and saying if the development of language among humans is the product of culture/society, then it must be the same for God. I disagree with that premise primarily because the Christian God we are talking about is said to be omni-everything, and so is not bound by the same limitations, or required prequisites for something to happen, as humans are."
... it would seem to me that there must be some logical limitations on what "omni-everything" means.
Intelligence requires language. Language is a product of society. Therefore, before there were people there were no languages... and no intelligence.
It seems to me that intelligence can't stand by itself. Intelligence can't be static, and postulating a single being that knows everything, and can do everything, is creating an end to knowing. It's a verbal black hole where even though you can say it, when you think about it, it means nothing. Like "eternal life." Nothing is eternal... especially life... and words.
Doesn't being intelligent means having answers? Can you have answers without words going in, and words coming out? I don't think that a feral person could ever be defined as "intelligent."
There was a recent article on the possibilities of "intelligent life" in the universe in the BBC. The scientist, Duncan Forgan says, "If alien life forms do exist, we may not necessarily be able to make contact with them, and we have no idea what form they would take." Link
I think if there is "intelligent life" out there they will have languages. They will be noisy.
I apologize for taking so long to reply.
Sometimes I find it dumb to take the purely physical route to explain everything.
God was talking to light and whatever he was creating
Comment