Who is the Anti-Christ?
(666) The mark of the Beast
Collapse
X
-
Re: (666) The mark of the Beast
It is the Pope.....
The largest religious group world-wide is the Roman Catholic Organization. Now the head of the Roman Catholic is the Pope otherwise known as
V I C A R I U S F I L I I D E I
The meaning of his name is:
VICARIUS - Substituting for, or in place of
FILII - Son
DEL - God
Now we have, Substituting for the Son of God.
V=5 I=1 C=100 A=0 R=0 I=1 U=5 S=0
VICARIOUS
F=0 I=1 L=50 I=1 I=1
FILII
D=500 E=0 I=0
Add all the numbers togather and you will get 666
Remember its the number of a man.
Comment
-
-
Re: (666) The mark of the Beast
Originally posted by wildfire1_102:
[qb]It is the Pope.....
The largest religious group world-wide is the Roman Catholic Organization. Now the head of the Roman Catholic is the Pope otherwise known as
V I C A R I U S F I L I I D E I
The meaning of his name is:
VICARIUS - Substituting for, or in place of
FILII - Son
DEL - God
Now we have, Substituting for the Son of God.
V=5 I=1 C=100 A=0 R=0 I=1 U=5 S=0
VICARIOUS
F=0 I=1 L=50 I=1 I=1
FILII
D=500 E=0 I=0
Add all the numbers togather and you will get 666
Remember its the number of a man.[/qb]
Comment
-
-
Re: (666) The mark of the Beast
(Wahalla)
Laugh if you have to, cry if you must.
But, remember what the bible say.
The Anti-Christ is already in the world.
1 John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
Comment
-
-
Re: (666) The mark of the Beast
(Wildfire)
Originally posted by wildfire1_102:
[qb]It is the Pope.....
The largest religious group world-wide is the Roman Catholic Organization. Now the head of the Roman Catholic is the Pope otherwise known as
V I C A R I U S F I L I I D E I
The meaning of his name is:
VICARIUS - Substituting for, or in place of
FILII - Son
DEL - God
Now we have, Substituting for the Son of God.
V=5 I=1 C=100 A=0 R=0 I=1 U=5 S=0
VICARIOUS
F=0 I=1 L=50 I=1 I=1
FILII
D=500 E=0 I=0
Add all the numbers togather and you will get 666
Remember its the number of a man.[/qb]
I have to go dig up some books and come back.
Comment
-
-
Re: (666) The mark of the Beast
Wildfire, I cannot believe that you wasted your time typing all of that; I certainly hope that you didn't waste your time actually making those silly calculations.
As has been posted in SPirituality MANY MANY MANY times before (check the archives), it's NOT the number six hundred sixty-six; It is three vauvs (Hebrew letter that equates roughly to the Letter "V"). It is more to be considered a picture/drawing, much like a heiroglyphic, of a clawmark, whcih is exactly how it was intended by the original authors.
Like I keep on saying (vainly, it seems)... one can NOT study the Bible except for doing so IN THE ORIGINAL LAUNGUAGES in which it was written and with a FULL UNDERSTANDING of the cultures in which it was written.
ANYone who believes what you posted (and *I* am NOT saying that YOU actually believe that garbage, THAT is for YOU to say!) clearly does NOT have any kind of understanding of the above criteria necessary to study the Bible properly.
By the way, IF you do not read Hebrew or Greek... to immediately create the ability to study the Bible as it was intended, without years of the studies you haven't already got (remember, I said IF), get the Tanakh. Ask Israelites or JM1 (if you don't believe ME) if it isn't worth the money.
Comment
-
-
Re: (666) The mark of the Beast
Originally posted by Witchy Ooman:
[qb]Wildfire, I cannot believe that you wasted your time typing all of that; I certainly hope that you didn't waste your time actually making those silly calculations.
As has been posted in SPirituality MANY MANY MANY times before (check the archives), it's NOT the number six hundred sixty-six; It is three vauvs (Hebrew letter that equates roughly to the Letter "V"). It is more to be considered a picture/drawing, much like a heiroglyphic, of a clawmark, whcih is exactly how it was intended by the original authors.
Like I keep on saying (vainly, it seems)... one can NOT study the Bible except for doing so IN THE ORIGINAL LAUNGUAGES in which it was written and with a FULL UNDERSTANDING of the cultures in which it was written.
ANYone who believes what you posted (and *I* am NOT saying that YOU actually believe that garbage, THAT is for YOU to say!) clearly does NOT have any kind of understanding of the above criteria necessary to study the Bible properly.
By the way, IF you do not read Hebrew or Greek... to immediately create the ability to study the Bible as it was intended, without years of the studies you haven't already got (remember, I said IF), get the Tanakh. Ask Israelites or JM1 (if you don't believe ME) if it isn't worth the money.[/qb]
Comment
-
ads
Collapse
Comment