“Exclusion of Non-Citizens from the United States”
In the 1880s and 1890s The United States Supreme Court decided a number of cases known collectively as The Chinese Exclusion Cases. The most significant one of these was Chae Chan Ping v. United States in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld The Scott Act, which prohibited Chinese laborers from re-entering the United States even if they had previously obtained a re-entry certificate. The practical effect of this was to abolish the legal effect of certificates of re-entry.
The US Supreme Court in upholding The Scott Act reasoned that the Federal Government had broad powers to restrict the rights of aliens to enter the country. "Jurisdiction over its own territory to that extent is an incident of every independent nation."
The basic reasoning in the Chinese Exclusion Cases still applies today to the interpretation of the Immigration Nationality Act. Non-citizens who travel upon non-immigrant visas may enter the United States only at the discretion of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Officer at the United States border.
Under the IIRA IRA (The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) <span style="font-size: 17pt">Statute, non-citizens who are engaged in narcotics activity or those who closely associate with those engaged in narcotics activity may have their visas revoked without a hearing.</span> The IIRA IRA Statute is used by U.S. law enforcement to prevent aliens suspected of narcotics involvement from entering the United States.
David P. Rowe is a Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law
Click here to read Dr. David P. Rowe’s profile
Copyright © 2006 The Law Offices of David P. Rowe & Rosemarie D. Robinson. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. more
"Further, a legal permanent resident is subject to mandatory detention if he or she was convicted of crimes of moral turpitude, aggravated felonies, controlled substance and firearms offenses, and was released from jail after 8 October, 1998. <span style="font-size: 17pt">This can occur at the airport. Individuals who fraternize knowingly with US or foreign- based felons may be detained at the airport under the broad "reason to believe" standard if they are deemed to have knowledge of narcotics based criminal activity</span>. This method is frequently used against Jamaicans. Some Jamaicans refer to this in the vernacular as getting "STUCK."
Copyright © 2006 The Law Offices of David P. Rowe & Rosemarie D. Robinson. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. link
<span style="color: #FF0000">Anyone who think that the recent visa loss have nothing to do with dudus must be delusional ,people on dudus stage hanging out with him and the minister should know this was coming.the idiot artist pon you tube asking the cameraman if him a cia ,and prezi have nuff tallup tallup now dem a ball bout visa
sad ting dem have to perform if prezi send call dem ,caught between a rock and a hard place.
</span>
In the 1880s and 1890s The United States Supreme Court decided a number of cases known collectively as The Chinese Exclusion Cases. The most significant one of these was Chae Chan Ping v. United States in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld The Scott Act, which prohibited Chinese laborers from re-entering the United States even if they had previously obtained a re-entry certificate. The practical effect of this was to abolish the legal effect of certificates of re-entry.
The US Supreme Court in upholding The Scott Act reasoned that the Federal Government had broad powers to restrict the rights of aliens to enter the country. "Jurisdiction over its own territory to that extent is an incident of every independent nation."
The basic reasoning in the Chinese Exclusion Cases still applies today to the interpretation of the Immigration Nationality Act. Non-citizens who travel upon non-immigrant visas may enter the United States only at the discretion of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Officer at the United States border.
Under the IIRA IRA (The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) <span style="font-size: 17pt">Statute, non-citizens who are engaged in narcotics activity or those who closely associate with those engaged in narcotics activity may have their visas revoked without a hearing.</span> The IIRA IRA Statute is used by U.S. law enforcement to prevent aliens suspected of narcotics involvement from entering the United States.
David P. Rowe is a Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law
Click here to read Dr. David P. Rowe’s profile
Copyright © 2006 The Law Offices of David P. Rowe & Rosemarie D. Robinson. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. more
"Further, a legal permanent resident is subject to mandatory detention if he or she was convicted of crimes of moral turpitude, aggravated felonies, controlled substance and firearms offenses, and was released from jail after 8 October, 1998. <span style="font-size: 17pt">This can occur at the airport. Individuals who fraternize knowingly with US or foreign- based felons may be detained at the airport under the broad "reason to believe" standard if they are deemed to have knowledge of narcotics based criminal activity</span>. This method is frequently used against Jamaicans. Some Jamaicans refer to this in the vernacular as getting "STUCK."
Copyright © 2006 The Law Offices of David P. Rowe & Rosemarie D. Robinson. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. link
<span style="color: #FF0000">Anyone who think that the recent visa loss have nothing to do with dudus must be delusional ,people on dudus stage hanging out with him and the minister should know this was coming.the idiot artist pon you tube asking the cameraman if him a cia ,and prezi have nuff tallup tallup now dem a ball bout visa


Comment