Re: Portia's budget speech
And that comes fram a contemporary of the missing Fledgst...
I must admit while I think the speech was not long and filled with aunties homilies... I kinda feel sorry for her. I mean apart from the begining it was not all that different from Pattersons speeches.. And while Doctor Nemhard may be right in is analysis. It is simply more of the same. It is expected that the party in power will spend to get relected.
I actually like Golding budget presentations, I find them simple to understand but that is not a reccomendation because if I can understand his points then it shows how dumb it is. He actually has an easier job than the governetn side to poke holes in their presentation. Economics I learnt from Golding is not an exact science and each action has multiple effects both negative and positive. It is suppose to be the function of the goverment side to do a set of actions which are by enlarge positive. Since you can examine the consequence of each action, then it is their function to sell the negative.
It is worth noting in the parlimentary process, the actual buget is present by the minister of finance not the PM. So while Golding presentation was a rebuttal to Omars.. So while every one is looking at the pms they seem to ignore Omars.. Smoke and mirrors .....
And that comes fram a contemporary of the missing Fledgst...
I must admit while I think the speech was not long and filled with aunties homilies... I kinda feel sorry for her. I mean apart from the begining it was not all that different from Pattersons speeches.. And while Doctor Nemhard may be right in is analysis. It is simply more of the same. It is expected that the party in power will spend to get relected.
I actually like Golding budget presentations, I find them simple to understand but that is not a reccomendation because if I can understand his points then it shows how dumb it is. He actually has an easier job than the governetn side to poke holes in their presentation. Economics I learnt from Golding is not an exact science and each action has multiple effects both negative and positive. It is suppose to be the function of the goverment side to do a set of actions which are by enlarge positive. Since you can examine the consequence of each action, then it is their function to sell the negative.
It is worth noting in the parlimentary process, the actual buget is present by the minister of finance not the PM. So while Golding presentation was a rebuttal to Omars.. So while every one is looking at the pms they seem to ignore Omars.. Smoke and mirrors .....
Comment