A senior police officer yesterday claimed that the contracts offered to foreign cops now serving the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) were uneven compared to those offered to their local counterparts and blasted the arrangement as wicked.
At the same time, Assistant Commissioner of Police Leon Rose, the outgoing chairman of the Police Officers Association (POA), urged the Police Service Commission (PSC) to review the terms and conditions of the contracts.
According to Rose, fairness and equity demand that the terms and conditions that guarantee tenureship and remuneration based on similarity of rank should be equal to all.
" The present arrangement is iniquitous. It is wrong from the level of the commissioner to the commissioning ranks and we (POA) find this unacceptable," Rose told the POA's annual general meeting at the Hilton Kingston Hotel.
"An examination of the terms and conditions of contracts proposed for local officers, vis-a-vis those offered to our foreign colleagues, speaks of a disparity unprecedented in the history of modern times," said Rose.
Three British cops are now employed on contract to the JCF. They are Mark Shields, the deputy commissioner in charge of crime; assistant commissioners Les Green, who handles serious and organised crime under Shields' portfolio; and Paul Robinson, who heads the firearms and coastal control portfolio.
Under a new arrangement in the police force, officers from the rank of assistant commissioner up to commissioner are required to sign contracts.
Police Commissioner Lucius Thomas has already signed his contract, which runs for three years.
Yesterday, Rose said that while the POA was not averse to contracts, which have already been given to some officers, there must be three fundamental principles of employment. He listed them as fairness and equity, a disengagement clause consistent with labour relations and industrial practices, and a process of natural justice.
He questioned the relevance of drug and polygraph tests which, he said, were included in the contracts of local police officers, asking how they could address efficiency and effectiveness.
"A contract which is individualistic in its negotiating process and content is a recipe for disunity, distrust, disloyalty, and will ultimately undermine the core principles on which the organisation is built," said Rose. "Any sensible contractual arrangement within such an organisation must be done in conformity with the recognised bargaining, but in an equitable and transparent manner."
He said it was nonsensical to demand greater levels of effectiveness and efficiency in the JCF when the present contracts offered do not address training and development and the resources necessary to achieve targets that can be accurately measured against expected performances.
Comment