Shaking off slavery's malignant legacy
Diane Abbott
Sunday, January 14, 2007
There was a Hollywood movie starring Marilyn Monroe with the title Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. The Jamaican version might be 'Gentlemen Prefer Brownings'.
Diane Abbott
In a recent article in another newspaper a prominent journalist robustly defended his preference for light-skinned women. His argument was that it was all a matter of personal taste and aesthetics. It was no different, he contended, from some women preferring tall men. He graciously accepted that, if his preferred light-skinned woman was actually not a nice person, he might accept a darker woman. But his overall message was that all things being equal, lighter-skinned women were more desirable.
My first thought about this article was that you could not get it printed in Britain. This is not for any political reason. It is because the average white newspaper or magazine editor would not know what you were talking about. The gradations of skin colour that Jamaicans obsess about mean nothing in Britain.
As far as white people in Britain are concerned, once you have discernible Negro blood you are black and that is an end of it. This has come as a shock to generations of light-skinned Jamaicans who have come to Britain to settle or study. They fondly believe that their light skin means that they will be treated differently from ordinary black people. But (unless you are so light you might be Mediterranean) racism in Britain is no respecter of gradations of skin colour.
In America it is different. There they had words for gradations of skin colour: Quadroon if you were a quarter black, octoroon if you were one-eighth black and so on. What Jamaica and America have in common is that they were both countries based on mass holdings of slaves. Of course, Britain made huge sums of money out of the slave trade.
(Historians like Trinidad's Eric Williams argue that profits from the slave trade funded Britain's Industrial Revolution). But in Britain itself, slavery was confined to domestic servants. There was never the mass slaveholding that characterised the Caribbean and the southern states of America. An obsession with the exact shade of black that a man or woman is would seem to be a feature of slaveholding societies.
DAVIS. symbol of the black power movement in the USA
So black men who prefer light-skinned women cannot get away with explaining it away as a mere aesthetic choice. What they are actually doing is replicating the values of the slave master. Under slavery, white blood gave a slave privileged status. They were above a mere field hand. Black men who lust after light-skinned women are subconsciously trying to elevate their own status. And they are certainly consciously buying into the hierarchy of skin colour imposed by slavery. Two hundred years after the abolition of slavery in the British Empire, this is more than a little sad.
In some ways, black people appear to have gone backwards on this issue. The 1970s were the era of "black is beautiful" and Angela Davis and her iconic Afro hairstyle. Skin bleaching was scorned. Now, the media is saturated with images of light-skinned black women with long (false) straight hair. This is particularly true of TV stations like MTV and on music videos. And these media are hugely influential with young people.
Improvements in false hair technology (the weave) mean that every black woman thinks long flowing hair can be hers. They do not seem to stop and think: whether it actually suits them; what it will look like when it starts to grow out and looks matted and what it says about their racial pride.
Skin bleaching is on the rise. Apparently even young men are bleaching in Jamaica. Again, no one seems to consider what damage they are doing to their skin or how bizarre it looks to have a bleached face and black hands. They are in the grip of an obsession with looking more like white people.
And yet, at the same time as many black women want to look more white, increasing numbers of white women are trying to look more black. A deep tan has been fashionable amongst rich white women for some time. But the latest thing among actresses, models and socialites is having their lips injected to make them full and pouting, just like black women.
Some white women are even going as far as to have buttock implants in order to give themselves the sumptuous large bottom that has always characterised black women. Because, of course, black IS beautiful. And that is why it is depressing to hear (supposedly) intelligent black men proudly rejecting women who look like their mother and sisters in favour of the browning.
A preference for light-skinned women is not a simple matter of taste, like preferring red wine to white. It partly shows the extent to which we are brainwashed by the images of "ideal" female beauty pumped out by the mass media. But it also reveals how far some of us have to go in shaking off the malignant legacy of slavery.
Diane Abbott
Sunday, January 14, 2007
There was a Hollywood movie starring Marilyn Monroe with the title Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. The Jamaican version might be 'Gentlemen Prefer Brownings'.
Diane Abbott
In a recent article in another newspaper a prominent journalist robustly defended his preference for light-skinned women. His argument was that it was all a matter of personal taste and aesthetics. It was no different, he contended, from some women preferring tall men. He graciously accepted that, if his preferred light-skinned woman was actually not a nice person, he might accept a darker woman. But his overall message was that all things being equal, lighter-skinned women were more desirable.
My first thought about this article was that you could not get it printed in Britain. This is not for any political reason. It is because the average white newspaper or magazine editor would not know what you were talking about. The gradations of skin colour that Jamaicans obsess about mean nothing in Britain.
As far as white people in Britain are concerned, once you have discernible Negro blood you are black and that is an end of it. This has come as a shock to generations of light-skinned Jamaicans who have come to Britain to settle or study. They fondly believe that their light skin means that they will be treated differently from ordinary black people. But (unless you are so light you might be Mediterranean) racism in Britain is no respecter of gradations of skin colour.
In America it is different. There they had words for gradations of skin colour: Quadroon if you were a quarter black, octoroon if you were one-eighth black and so on. What Jamaica and America have in common is that they were both countries based on mass holdings of slaves. Of course, Britain made huge sums of money out of the slave trade.
(Historians like Trinidad's Eric Williams argue that profits from the slave trade funded Britain's Industrial Revolution). But in Britain itself, slavery was confined to domestic servants. There was never the mass slaveholding that characterised the Caribbean and the southern states of America. An obsession with the exact shade of black that a man or woman is would seem to be a feature of slaveholding societies.
DAVIS. symbol of the black power movement in the USA
So black men who prefer light-skinned women cannot get away with explaining it away as a mere aesthetic choice. What they are actually doing is replicating the values of the slave master. Under slavery, white blood gave a slave privileged status. They were above a mere field hand. Black men who lust after light-skinned women are subconsciously trying to elevate their own status. And they are certainly consciously buying into the hierarchy of skin colour imposed by slavery. Two hundred years after the abolition of slavery in the British Empire, this is more than a little sad.
In some ways, black people appear to have gone backwards on this issue. The 1970s were the era of "black is beautiful" and Angela Davis and her iconic Afro hairstyle. Skin bleaching was scorned. Now, the media is saturated with images of light-skinned black women with long (false) straight hair. This is particularly true of TV stations like MTV and on music videos. And these media are hugely influential with young people.
Improvements in false hair technology (the weave) mean that every black woman thinks long flowing hair can be hers. They do not seem to stop and think: whether it actually suits them; what it will look like when it starts to grow out and looks matted and what it says about their racial pride.
Skin bleaching is on the rise. Apparently even young men are bleaching in Jamaica. Again, no one seems to consider what damage they are doing to their skin or how bizarre it looks to have a bleached face and black hands. They are in the grip of an obsession with looking more like white people.
And yet, at the same time as many black women want to look more white, increasing numbers of white women are trying to look more black. A deep tan has been fashionable amongst rich white women for some time. But the latest thing among actresses, models and socialites is having their lips injected to make them full and pouting, just like black women.
Some white women are even going as far as to have buttock implants in order to give themselves the sumptuous large bottom that has always characterised black women. Because, of course, black IS beautiful. And that is why it is depressing to hear (supposedly) intelligent black men proudly rejecting women who look like their mother and sisters in favour of the browning.
A preference for light-skinned women is not a simple matter of taste, like preferring red wine to white. It partly shows the extent to which we are brainwashed by the images of "ideal" female beauty pumped out by the mass media. But it also reveals how far some of us have to go in shaking off the malignant legacy of slavery.
Comment