Re: How can you love and fear God?
[quote=evanovitch] so not only do u use Wikipedia as a source
u cite doctrine from a denomination , the Roman Catholic church...a denomination that SOLD indulgences etc...the said one u decry fi the Inquisition but now u citing as a credible source on Christianity.... 
dat is really a credible source of bakative for ur stance......
Evanovitch,
So how many people belong to the RC Church and follow what they teach and how many people belong to your church? My guess is that you believe that yours is the TRUE church and all others are heretical.
Leviticus is in everyone's Bible (not Mormons, not Jehovah's Witnesses and it is nonsense in today's societies.
No one sacrifices animals to God anymore because the very idea is ludicrous to everyone.
There are many other sections of the Bible Old and New Testaments that are likewise not applicable to today's societies and mores but to which people cling out of faith and/or until an authority figure says they no longer apply.
Much of the Bible is meant as allegory, analogy and other ways of putting very complicated theological concepts into stories that unsophisticated people can understand and were not meant to be taken literally as they so often are by various fundamentalist sects.
The very fact that there is such wide divergence in rules, thinking, rituals, prayers all within what is called Christianity shows that it is all created by man.
An omniscient God would have inspired the writers of the Bible to have written in words and ways that would have made His will perfectly clear to every person and we would not EVER have had these divisions and varying religions that conflict with one another.
The world would know and believe as one.
BTW, if you want to disparage the sources I use, you should come up with specifics as to where the references I am using are inaccurate. To just post smiley faces does not make an intellectual point.
What do you find erroneous or illogical about the video's portrayal of the Flood as an incredibly whimsical and cruel act of a supposedly merciful and omniscient God?
Does it make any sense for an all powerful God to drown millions of innocent babies because he is [censored] at a bunch of sinners?
And if everyone drowned except Noah and his family, do you accept that incestuous relationships between Noah and his daughters (as described in the Bible) resulted in the great number of people alive today ?
Yes, by all means, speak to me of "credibility" and laugh at logic and morality.
[quote=evanovitch] so not only do u use Wikipedia as a source


dat is really a credible source of bakative for ur stance......
Evanovitch,
So how many people belong to the RC Church and follow what they teach and how many people belong to your church? My guess is that you believe that yours is the TRUE church and all others are heretical.
Leviticus is in everyone's Bible (not Mormons, not Jehovah's Witnesses and it is nonsense in today's societies.
No one sacrifices animals to God anymore because the very idea is ludicrous to everyone.
There are many other sections of the Bible Old and New Testaments that are likewise not applicable to today's societies and mores but to which people cling out of faith and/or until an authority figure says they no longer apply.
Much of the Bible is meant as allegory, analogy and other ways of putting very complicated theological concepts into stories that unsophisticated people can understand and were not meant to be taken literally as they so often are by various fundamentalist sects.
The very fact that there is such wide divergence in rules, thinking, rituals, prayers all within what is called Christianity shows that it is all created by man.
An omniscient God would have inspired the writers of the Bible to have written in words and ways that would have made His will perfectly clear to every person and we would not EVER have had these divisions and varying religions that conflict with one another.
The world would know and believe as one.
BTW, if you want to disparage the sources I use, you should come up with specifics as to where the references I am using are inaccurate. To just post smiley faces does not make an intellectual point.
What do you find erroneous or illogical about the video's portrayal of the Flood as an incredibly whimsical and cruel act of a supposedly merciful and omniscient God?
Does it make any sense for an all powerful God to drown millions of innocent babies because he is [censored] at a bunch of sinners?
And if everyone drowned except Noah and his family, do you accept that incestuous relationships between Noah and his daughters (as described in the Bible) resulted in the great number of people alive today ?
Yes, by all means, speak to me of "credibility" and laugh at logic and morality.
Comment