'Deadbeat dad'

[Gen]

expound

blame dem eediat blakk misleaders fe sellinn out poor peeps

[Gen]

not to mention the lacking extra curricular activities for the children

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOriU7_DIB8&list=UUoJ8WwEH7kSlF-xQ8S4Nn0Q

[kia027]

man iss natt wutliss. iff imm was wutliss, all dem oomen wood natt ave breed fe imm

yuh mean yuh neva saw dem rapist tredd mii tarted bout da blakk man dat oyinbo held upp as da ideal blakk fathers cah imm luv to criticized blakk men

too much jello

de man wutliss cause im allow imself fi breed more pickney dan im can manage. If you can be there emotionally, physically & financially for your children den go all out. If not, be responsible

[blugiant]

WRAP IT UP ... know better do better... know of one who call the man ex crying cause shi want baby and him wouldn't give in to her (him had enough him wasn't taking care of). While mothers often raising the kids it takes 2 to tango ... man must not leave his children to be mismanaged by the state.

stapp bout wrapp itt cum cah mii doan defend condumbs

mii kno oomen woo wukk inna child support place ann dem awlway chattinn bout "sum stoopid oomen woo repeatelee cum inna dem affice fe tri fe gitt support fram de same baby fadder woo natt supportinn dem addar yuths. wen oyinbo kulcha encourage slackness, y label blakk men as deadbeat cah imm nuh mine imm yuths? yuh kno awl da studee shows dat iff single maddars ave enuff money fe mind dem yuths moas aff dem yuths tunn out fine. fimi argument iss dat de guv need fe better support awl yuths even iff da faddar doan. lockinn upp poor fadders woo cyaan afford fe play child support iss bout criminalizinn povertee ann labelinn poor men as unsuitable faddars

[blugiant]

expound

homelessness iss rising among blakk families ann blakk yuths butt dem blakk misleaders luv fe gitt upp ann chatt bout blakk fadders being irresponseebible instead aff address da povertee as da root causes. instead aff arguinn fe more money fe welfare fe raise da livinn standards aff madders dem chattinn nunsense bout deadbeat faddars even dough dat mean moas single madders wood still be in povertee. dem bigginn upp corporate welfare wild dem stigmatizinn sintinn dat wood help more single maddars.

wen itt was moaslee poor oyinbo men woo were natt supportinn dem yuths, oyinbo oomen got welfare eazee. wen poor oyinbo men use fe mekk dem yuths wukk ann support dem families oyinbo passed child welfare laws. oyinbo men were natt label as deadbeat. wan aff reason oyinbo kulcha legitimized marriages iss cah oyinbo men neva mind dem yuths. now wen itt poor fadders woo cyaan afford fe properlee mind dem yuth itt becum deadbeat

[blugiant]

de man wutliss cause im allow imself fi breed more pickney dan im can manage. If you can be there emotionally, physically & financially for your children den go all out. If not, be responsible

yuh runninn fram da underlieinn issues dat yuh doan tink poor fadders woo cyaan mind dem yuths shood be allowed fe ave yuths

[kia027]

yuh runninn fram da underlieinn issues dat yuh doan tink poor fadders woo cyaan mind dem yuths shood be allowed fe ave yuths

If dem cyan mind dem, dey should not have dem. Dat is what responsible people do

[twiney]

The Bible say a man who don't take care of him responsibility is worst than an infidel aka him good for nothing. If him no want wear condom den snip snip and pray the woman no give him anything or better yet service to any offspring he would create abstain.

[blugiant]

The Bible say a man who don't take care of him responsibility is worst than an infidel aka him good for nothing. If him no want wear condom den snip snip and pray the woman no give him anything or better yet service to any offspring he would create abstain.

so wan man wrote in bible dat "a man who don't take care of him responsibility is worst than an infidel aka him good for nothing." yuh kno dat manee aff dem men woo wrote da bible lied bout dem identities dat y yuh fe read widd a grain aff salt

[blugiant]

If dem cyan mind dem, dey should not have dem. Dat is what responsible people do

yuh sund like dem eugenics peeps woo use similar argument fe argue y blakk shood natt ave yuths

[kia027]

yuh sund like dem eugenics peeps woo use similar argument fe argue y blakk shood natt ave yuths

Yeah whateva

[blugiant]

Yeah whateva

Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, is often hailed as a champion of women’s rights in historical texts and classes. However, chronically neglected is her true disdain for minority groups in America and how she saw birth control as a way of limiting the populations of those she deemed unworthy of bearing children, even going so far as to advocate that married couples must submit applications in order to have children!

Sanger published articles in her newsletter, the “Birth Control Review,” that depicted her opinions that certain groups of people should have “never should have been born” and that birth control was intended to “create a race of thoroughbreds,” and ensure that society had “more children from the fit, less from the unfit.”

Eugenics-advocate groups like the American Eugenics Society, of which Sanger was a listed member until 1956, suggested that the government should consider putting birth control chemicals in the food and water supplies in certain areas of the nation, specifically in urban areas that were dominated by minority groups. Sanger even suggested imposing a law that would disallow women from having children without first obtaining a permit from the government—a permit that would good for only one baby—and if approved, the couple would receive an antidote to counter the effects of the involuntarily ingested birth control chemicals.

The Planned Parenthood founder made her views even more blatantly obvious in a letter she wrote to a woman named Katherine Dexter McCormick in 1950, saying she thought that “…there should be national sterilization for certain dysgenic types of our population who are being encouraged to breed and would die out were the government not feeding them.” McCormick was very wealthy and she later went on to assist Sanger in developing and funding the birth control pill.

That’s funny, because Planned Parenthood never mentions any of these views upon which they were founded in 1942. Although they honor Margaret Sanger annually (with the “Maggie Award”), they conveniently pick and choose which of her values to publicly celebrate and which to sweep under the rug. They would never consider condemning the twisted ideologies of this woman.

However, Sanger’s opinions are still apparent today in Planned Parenthood, and the true intention of birth control is still deliberately hidden under the guise of “women’s liberation.” Their most recent epitome of this was portrayed when Planned Parenthood built the largest abortion facility in the western hemisphere in the center of four heavily minority areas; they blatantly showed that they still to this day target minority groups and continue to play out Sanger’s intentions for the organization.

http://liveaction.org/blog/racist-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger-was-not-so-pro-choice/

[blugiant]

Forced Sterilization Victims Granted 50k Over Admitted US ‘Eugenics’ Program


This is no conspiracy theory — North Carolina officials are proposing that victims of forced sterilization programs be given $50,000 each in compensation, with the Associated Press admitting that the sterilization campaign was part of a “once-common public health practice called eugenics.” Victims include thousands of individuals, such as criminals, mentally disabled, and women who were sterilized after giving birth to children as a product of rape.

The forced sterilizations occurred from 1929 to 1974 under admitted eugenics programs that officials claimed were ‘creating a better society’ by removing the reproductive abilities of criminals and those suffering from mental disorders. During this time periods, more than 7,600 individuals in North Carolina were sterilized. On a national scale, around 60,000 were forcibly sterilized under the same eugenics program.
Eugenics Program Linked to Nazi Germany, Targeted Mostly Black Women

What makes North Carolina’s rampant sterilizations so concerning, however, is that the program kept going on right through World War II despite the direct association between eugenics and Nazi Germany. In fact, about 70% of all North Carolina’s sterilizations were performed after the war, with numbers peaking in the 1950s. Again, this is not something being made up; this is all reported by the Associated Press and other mainstream media outlets. According to the Associated Press report:

North Carolina’s program stood out because it ramped up sterilizations after World War II despite associations between eugenics and Nazi Germany.

The report also states within the first sentence that the practicing of eugenics was quite common during this time period:

People sterilized against their will under a discredited North Carolina state program should each be paid $50,000, a task force voted Tuesday, marking the first time a state has moved to compensate victims of a once-common public health practice called eugenics.

Perhaps the most criminal part of the forced sterilizations is the blatant racism involved. Most victims were poor, black women who were ‘deemed unfit to be parents’. Individuals as young as 10 were sterilized simply for not getting along with schoolmates or being promiscuous, and many parents were misled into sterilizing their children. All of this happened in the United States, where government officials operated under a strict eugenics policy, seeing many people as ‘unfit’ to procreate. After this racist, Nazi-styled fertility purge, the victims may not receive a measly $50,000 decades after the fact.

http://naturalsociety.com/forced-sterilization-victims-issued-50k-admitted-us-eugenics-program/

[blugiant]

In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” (Margaret Sanger commenting on the ‘Negro Project’ in a letter to Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939).

[kia027]

and you know the case of the deadbeat dad we are referring to in this case is not associated with the Eugenics program but of HIS personal IRRESPONSIBILITY in having kids that he cannot bother mind. You are trying to divert the conversation to avoid the fact that you have an irresponsible black man who a have so much pickney he does not have the time to mind them all..

as mi said before
whatever