Serious Question

[rufian]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

I took it as the poster referencing Cindy as a white person who is aging badly. </div></div>
and wa wrong wid that?

but i find the lady to look nothing close to a shrivelled up old prune

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

I took it as the poster referencing Cindy as a white person who is aging badly. </div></div>
and wa wrong wid that?

but i find the lady to look nothing close to a shrivelled up old prune </div></div>what is wrong with that is that you need to compare black to white to make black look better. why can't black just be good of it's own accord.

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: Serious Question

like when I was coming up there was a saying black is beauty an red is corruption.

[evanovitch]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">anyway, figive mi fi tekking u post to a level weh u mite not have intended.... </div></div> naw man the discussion is healthy

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">come now T let us not be tooo PC...u done know, an i have seen it pon yah , dat many dont tink dat Cindy's complexion is an example of wat is defined as black...fi real...how many people who have darker complexion dan urs , fi instance, wi cawl demself fair...tink pon di mindset of dat fi a minit, an den tink of all the mindsets dat r around here, tryin to pass demselves off as grounded people.... </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold">I took it as the poster referencing Cindy as a white person who is aging badly.</span> </div></div>

an the irony is dat it shows how oddas fight di aging process...Cindy obviously has no desire to hide her natural self....but why cite dis one poster as having an agenda an not another poster who will go outta dem way to bigup a know oldster who is fighting the aging process....i.e. dang u look good fi u age<span style="font-weight: bold">.....we see it on here all the time an usually wen a point is trying to be made at the expense of anodda poster</span>....

the dishonesty in the attempt to appear honest is ?able too, dont....i.e. di odda smaddy is not liked by me so mek mi mek it seem dat dem is a hag wile u mi fren has supped at the fountain of yute ....

[rufian]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

I took it as the poster referencing Cindy as a white person who is aging badly. </div></div>
and wa wrong wid that?

but i find the lady to look nothing close to a shrivelled up old prune </div></div>what is wrong with that is that you need to compare black to white to make black look better. why can't black just be good of it's own accord. </div></div>
we seem to compare black and white all the time for good reasons.

[evanovitch]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

I took it as the poster referencing Cindy as a white person who is aging badly. </div></div>
and wa wrong wid that?

but i find the lady to look nothing close to a shrivelled up old prune </div></div>what is wrong with that is that you need to compare black to white to make black look better. why can't black just be good of it's own accord. </div></div>
we seem to compare black and white all the time for good reasons.

an the comparisons and the reasons and the wateva seemingly ha merit r not depending on the dynamics of the posters' real r imagined interrelating

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: Serious Question

[quote]an the irony is dat it shows how oddas fight di aging process...Cindy obviously has no desire to hide her natural self....but why cite dis one poster as having an agenda an not another poster who will go outta dem way to bigup a know oldster who is fighting the aging process....i.e. dang u look good fi u age.....<span style="font-weight: bold">we see it on here all the time an usually wen a point is trying to be made at the expense of anodda poster....

the dishonesty in the attempt to appear honest is ?able too, dont.... [/</span>quote]

disclaimier: mi not saying that poster had an agenda.

and you lost me in the bolded part

[rufian]

Re: Serious Question

Now all de tralala bout Cindy make we wonder if it just offensive because of her skin colour. I dont identify with her as I suspect that she would not identify wid me(as me never bed wid Marley), so anybody kyan say wa dem like bout her. \ö/

I still think the poster had positive intentions.

[evanovitch]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Now all de tralala bout Cindy make we wonder if it just offensive because of her skin colour. I dont identify with her as I suspect that she would not identify wid me(as me never bed wid Marley), so anybody kyan say wa dem like bout her. \ö/

I still think the poster had positive intentions. </div></div>

mi cannot even memba di post to be honest...mi juss a tek di opportunity fi use dis post as a outlet fi mek couple points... but i did look at some pictures i took of Cindy bak in 2000 an i could see some aging...but den, Cindy had a coke problem and dat played havoc wid har skin too....but on the whole, she ages wid grace and style....i.e. she aint fighting it an she is always tasteful in complementing it

[evanovitch]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> [quote]an the irony is dat it shows how oddas fight di aging process...Cindy obviously has no desire to hide her natural self....but why cite dis one poster as having an agenda an not another poster who will go outta dem way to bigup a know oldster who is fighting the aging process....i.e. dang u look good fi u age.....<span style="font-weight: bold">we see it on here all the time an usually wen a point is trying to be made at the expense of anodda poster....

the dishonesty in the attempt to appear honest is ?able too, dont.... [/</span>quote]

disclaimier: mi not saying that poster had an agenda.



and you lost me in the bolded part </div></div>

using moi as di example...u see it all di while..a one wi jump een to point out di commendable attributes of smaddy dem tink mi ha issue wid, wid di asides meant to imply mi no ha dem....of course wile not knowing how i really tink about di one dem do show weh dem thoughts bout di I etc lie... if it wasn't laughable it would be laughable at times u eva notice dat wen some peeps awn yah a get supposedly cuss out who wi quik fi tek up dem case not realising dat wen dem no dweet fi <span style="font-weight: bold">everyone</span>, it showssssssssssss

[rufian]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

an the comparisons and the reasons and the wateva seemingly ha merit r not depending on the dynamics of the posters' real r imagined interrelating </div></div>
it shouldnt, if it does den de smaddi is a mad

[evanovitch]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

an the comparisons and the reasons and the wateva seemingly ha merit r not depending on the dynamics of the posters' real r imagined interrelating </div></div>

it shouldnt, if it does den de smaddi is a mad </div></div>

well, dose who claim dem frenships ,dem is fren an dem wi defen dem fren to di en'...dont ...

[diabolical_Tanya]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

an the comparisons and the reasons and the wateva seemingly ha merit r not depending on the dynamics of the posters' real r imagined interrelating </div></div>

it shouldnt, if it does den de smaddi is a mad </div></div>

well, dose who claim dem frenships ,dem is fren an dem wi defen dem fren to di en'...dont ...

</div></div> an dem sworn enemy mek dem tek an opposing stance so as to not have to agree wid dem aye sah

[rufian]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

an the comparisons and the reasons and the wateva seemingly ha merit r not depending on the dynamics of the posters' real r imagined interrelating </div></div>

it shouldnt, if it does den de smaddi is a mad </div></div>

well, dose who claim dem frenships ,dem is fren an dem wi defen dem fren to di en'...dont ...

</div></div>
dat is why me warn people how me stay all de fren dem a play

[evanovitch]

Re: Serious Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: evanovitch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

an the comparisons and the reasons and the wateva seemingly ha merit r not depending on the dynamics of the posters' real r imagined interrelating </div></div>

it shouldnt, if it does den de smaddi is a mad </div></div>

well, dose who claim dem frenships ,dem is fren an dem wi defen dem fren to di en'...dont ...

</div></div> an dem sworn enemy mek dem tek an opposing stance so as to not have to agree wid dem aye sah

once mi fine out seh a one a jimscreechy in any way, dat is wen mi lap mi frock ...odda dan dat, mi no kip fren an company more dan so