Re: Selfish oomens who decide to breed widdout a husban
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wahalla</div><div class="ubbcode-body">a main issue i have with womans liberation/ femisism is they seems to have degraded the importance of raising children as a lower importance than work..
and hell my wife who is the primary care giver has a more important role than me the material provider... Dont get me wrong but if you can afford it I beleive that one parent should stay home and be a care giver.. it is immaterial the sex of this person is... (Tropi made this point that she wanted to stay home and resented the fact she had to work)... I at the moment can bring home enough that my wife can stay home.. But if she had to work to keep the home secure I would say go for it.. It is a less satisfactory arrangement.. On the other hand if she could bring back in materially more I would stay home.. T
hgough I will confess that I am a less capable care giver than she is... And because of the nature of lack of negotiation my children would have less fun, hence have a less happy child hood...
But despite being a secularist.. I beleive that this is a failure of a materialist aproach... The equating of child care with a montary measure.. Some things cannot be priced.. Raising a child cannot be valued as a job... Ideally it must be a labour of love. ... this devaluation of a male perspective is dangerous and we will end up with angry young men.. Hell we ahve enough....
<span style="font-weight: bold">I give credance that the best raiser of children are the biological parents... Any thing less is a compromise... Dont assume that I am saying that biological parents who harm children are ideal.. I am saying fundamentally children must be safe... But the best gives are teh biological parents....And most are... </span>And despite my praise for bological parents raising their off string, I feel that non traditional parents can be good parents.. And as distateful as this may seem I have no problem with gays adobting children... and raising them... But that raises the issue of a too masculine or too feminine enviroment.... </div></div>
anything less is compromise...not true at all..I can't believe you actually <span style="text-decoration: line-through">made that statement</span>.. believe that

you went from biological to "non-traditional" parents..what about those in between
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wahalla</div><div class="ubbcode-body">a main issue i have with womans liberation/ femisism is they seems to have degraded the importance of raising children as a lower importance than work..
and hell my wife who is the primary care giver has a more important role than me the material provider... Dont get me wrong but if you can afford it I beleive that one parent should stay home and be a care giver.. it is immaterial the sex of this person is... (Tropi made this point that she wanted to stay home and resented the fact she had to work)... I at the moment can bring home enough that my wife can stay home.. But if she had to work to keep the home secure I would say go for it.. It is a less satisfactory arrangement.. On the other hand if she could bring back in materially more I would stay home.. T
hgough I will confess that I am a less capable care giver than she is... And because of the nature of lack of negotiation my children would have less fun, hence have a less happy child hood...
But despite being a secularist.. I beleive that this is a failure of a materialist aproach... The equating of child care with a montary measure.. Some things cannot be priced.. Raising a child cannot be valued as a job... Ideally it must be a labour of love. ... this devaluation of a male perspective is dangerous and we will end up with angry young men.. Hell we ahve enough....
<span style="font-weight: bold">I give credance that the best raiser of children are the biological parents... Any thing less is a compromise... Dont assume that I am saying that biological parents who harm children are ideal.. I am saying fundamentally children must be safe... But the best gives are teh biological parents....And most are... </span>And despite my praise for bological parents raising their off string, I feel that non traditional parents can be good parents.. And as distateful as this may seem I have no problem with gays adobting children... and raising them... But that raises the issue of a too masculine or too feminine enviroment.... </div></div>
anything less is compromise...not true at all..I can't believe you actually <span style="text-decoration: line-through">made that statement</span>.. believe that

you went from biological to "non-traditional" parents..what about those in between


we all scrutinise and judge when we ready..
HEAD
Comment