Tweet
Re: Pederasty - oral sex on newly circumcise infants
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I keep telling you that your nonsense is not the truth. Let's get that straight once and for all. It is not the truth.</div></div>
All I have done is posted what is printed in NYTimes. Okay so I called it oral sex, after all the mohel put his mouth on the child penis and suck to most people that's the definition of oral sex. Now I do not know if the mohel derived any pleasure from it but I sure do not think the baby did.....<span style="color: #990000"><span style="font-weight: bold">Okay lets chalk it up to poetic license</span></span>
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">I will not. (chalk it up to poetic license)
I am as sure that the mohel derived no sexual pleasure from it as I am that the infant did not.
As I said before, the point to the ritualistic circumcision of a bris is (1) to mark God's Chosen People as specified in Genesis, and (2) bloodletting to seal the covenant. Proof of this is that in case where a baby boy is born without a foreskin, the infant is pricked with a pin to draw a drop of blood in the spot where the foreskin should have been.
Additionally, all of the major branches of Judaism all eschew a mohel using his mouth to draw blood at a bris, these days, due to the risk of infection being passed to the infant. This doesn't man that there aren't some whack-a-doodles still doing it orally. There are nutjobs in every group.</span></span>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am sorry to have to tell you that there is no returned love for you on my part. And Christian charity be damned, it's only Xavier's insistence upon certain behavior that causes me to refrain from saying anything further to you.</div></div>
Can you at least forgive???
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">Forgiveness does not necessarily mean forgetting. We've had this particular discussion down in Faith, Reason & Philosophy.</span></span>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If it were left up solely to my Christian charity, I'm afraid that I'd be sorely lacking and I'd have to enumerate it amongst my other sins to my confessor. I cannot say that I enjoyed any of our exchanges. Nor can I foresee myself enjoying any exchange with you in the future. To use the Jamaican words - walk good, franksterr. </div></div>
I am indeed sorry that you feel that way about our exchanges, and is even in deeper regret that I have add to your sins.What can I do to make amends
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">Don't think twice. It's all right. (my apologies to Mr Dylan)</span></span> </div></div>
Peace
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I keep telling you that your nonsense is not the truth. Let's get that straight once and for all. It is not the truth.</div></div>
All I have done is posted what is printed in NYTimes. Okay so I called it oral sex, after all the mohel put his mouth on the child penis and suck to most people that's the definition of oral sex. Now I do not know if the mohel derived any pleasure from it but I sure do not think the baby did.....<span style="color: #990000"><span style="font-weight: bold">Okay lets chalk it up to poetic license</span></span>
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">I will not. (chalk it up to poetic license)
I am as sure that the mohel derived no sexual pleasure from it as I am that the infant did not.
As I said before, the point to the ritualistic circumcision of a bris is (1) to mark God's Chosen People as specified in Genesis, and (2) bloodletting to seal the covenant. Proof of this is that in case where a baby boy is born without a foreskin, the infant is pricked with a pin to draw a drop of blood in the spot where the foreskin should have been.
Additionally, all of the major branches of Judaism all eschew a mohel using his mouth to draw blood at a bris, these days, due to the risk of infection being passed to the infant. This doesn't man that there aren't some whack-a-doodles still doing it orally. There are nutjobs in every group.</span></span>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am sorry to have to tell you that there is no returned love for you on my part. And Christian charity be damned, it's only Xavier's insistence upon certain behavior that causes me to refrain from saying anything further to you.</div></div>
Can you at least forgive???
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">Forgiveness does not necessarily mean forgetting. We've had this particular discussion down in Faith, Reason & Philosophy.</span></span>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If it were left up solely to my Christian charity, I'm afraid that I'd be sorely lacking and I'd have to enumerate it amongst my other sins to my confessor. I cannot say that I enjoyed any of our exchanges. Nor can I foresee myself enjoying any exchange with you in the future. To use the Jamaican words - walk good, franksterr. </div></div>
I am indeed sorry that you feel that way about our exchanges, and is even in deeper regret that I have add to your sins.What can I do to make amends
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">Don't think twice. It's all right. (my apologies to Mr Dylan)</span></span> </div></div>
Peace
Comment