scarned oooman

[kia027]

Re: scarned oooman

I say, give the deadbeat fathers custody, with visitation rights and see how quick they start sending the checks [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70371-jump.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70371-jump.gif[/img]

[Bandana]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: loops</div><div class="ubbcode-body">and if they were wealthy when they had the child, but lose their job and become poor....they should stuff the child back in. </div></div>

[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70374-lipsrsealed.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img]

[mountaingal]

Re: scarned oooman

i think if a man wants to protect his money from his children's mother, he should actively seek full custody of his children so that way he knows that his money is directly going to them and not to the scorned woman. he should just raise the children of the union and relieve himself of the frustration of thinking that he is supporting a lazy woman who doesn't want to work.

it is, after all, about the money and the woman, and not the kids, right:

[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70400-talktohand.gif[/img]

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mrs. MarieK</div><div class="ubbcode-body">yup, she found out he's a criminal and reported him as such so now he's upset and chose to let HIS children suffer, dutty dawg </div></div>hii knew dat imm wass shadee. imm wass teefinn money fram imm law clients. soo cah imm neva pay ar $600 alimony shii report imm shady dealinn soo imm gitt fired fram imm jab. beefour imm gitt fired dem wass tekkinn child support out aff imm pay.

itt wass da stoopid vindictive ooman dat cause imm fii lose imm jab soo dem cood noo langar garnish imm check. itt wass cah aff da stoopid vindictive oomen y imm yuths affii suffa

[nattydreadgirl]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mountaingal</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i think if a man wants to protect his money from his children's mother, he should actively seek full custody of his children so that way he knows that his money is directly going to them and not to the scorned woman. he should just raise the children of the union and relieve himself of the frustration of thinking that he is supporting a lazy woman who doesn't want to work.

it is, after all, about the money and the woman, and not the kids, right:

[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70400-talktohand.gif[/img]
</div></div> I agree with this 100%, however, if she knew when they were married that he was being unethical/stealing or whatever, and she did not turn him in, then it looks like she was being vindictive to turn him in after he left her. As the saying goes she was cutting off her nose to spite her face.....

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kia</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Swedish</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If the man is the father...he is responsible for the child just as much as the mother. Regardless of his financial situation..if one can't support a child...then don't have one. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] nuff said...done talk.. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70374-lipsrsealed.gif[/img] </div></div>soo poor peeps shood natt ave yuths iff dem cyaan mine dem

</div></div>

so wha u a suggest here.. reversible vascetomies? [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img]
yes is the man haffi dweet cause u quick fi seh how ooman trick man into breeding so mek the man tek responsibility fi imself..[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img] </div></div>

yu wrang kia. mii will defend da poor man rite fii procreate even iff imm cyaan mine imm yuths. mii wood neva support babylonn vasectomies ting

[MarieK]

Re: scarned oooman

ok but he's nto hurting her he's hurting HIS children.

blu <span style='font-size: 26pt'>what about the children</span>

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kia</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I say, give the deadbeat fathers custody, with visitation rights and see how quick they start sending the checks [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70371-jump.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70371-jump.gif[/img] </div></div>

a latt more oomen wood start bawlinn bout stayinn home fadder wey livinn bigg affta da oomen chile support money

kia dem sey wen fadder ar bettar visitation rites dem more likelee fii pay child support

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body">since yu speculating..mek me speculate to..mebbe im tap pay child support as payback fe her spilling de beans pon him [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img] </div></div>

mii agree widd yu pan dat. paybakk iss [censored]. soo cood yu blame imm fii dat. yu cyaan xxpekk da mann fii tekk itt ann doo nooting </div></div>
[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/704555_dwl.gif[/img]
so its OK fe de man tek it out on his progeny as part a his due ..but de woman not fe seek revenge in any revenge.. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/confused.gif[/img]

aye sah

[nattydreadgirl]

Re: scarned oooman

The children are always the ones that end up getting hurt in divorce/support issues when the parents (both man and woman) can not put aside their differences, being vindictive, being jealous, being onery...the CHILDREN will always suffer in these situations.

My thinking is that she hurt her children also when she reported him out of angry, payback or whatever. She was getting the child support taken from his paycheck, now he is fired (due to his unethical behavior) He has no JOb, she has no Child Support!

My question that I would like to ask her is why now did she report him? What changed?

My opinion of him is he is a Deadbeat Dad, had a job and they had to garnish his pay, he was obivously not paying on his own will.....however, I feel that due to her anger she failed her kids also. Just my 2cents....

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mountaingal</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i think if a man wants to protect his money from his children's mother, he should actively seek full custody of his children so that way he knows that his money is directly going to them and not to the scorned woman. he should just raise the children of the union and relieve himself of the frustration of thinking that he is supporting a lazy woman who doesn't want to work.

it is, after all, about the money and the woman, and not the kids, right:

[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70400-talktohand.gif[/img]
</div></div>

soo lackinn upp da man inn jail fii money dat imm doan ave iss bout da yuth, natt money

soo da reason y da scarned ooman gitt da man fired cah da man natt payinn ar $600 a month alimoney even dough shii wass gittinn $2600 a month fii chile support everee month doan show yu dat itt wass bout money ann da scarned ooman

eediat ooman wood radder raise ar tree yuths pon 9.75 hour walmart jabb dan bee satisfied widd $2600 everee month cah shii wass more cancern bout arself dan de yuths

[Shine_Eye_Girl]

Re: scarned oooman

BOTTOM LINE...MAN HAFFI HELP TEK CARE AH IM PIKNEY DEM AT ANY COST.....CHAT BOUT[size:20pt][/size]

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

2 sides to every tory..

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Deadbeat judge jailed

Long fall from bench continues as he owes 270G in child support

BY NANCIE L. KATZ
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Friday, May 25th 2007, 4:00 AM


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Print Email Suggest a Story

Former judge Reynold Mason, the first Caribbean-born New York State Supreme Court justice, is put into a patrol car outside a Manhattan courthouse yesterday.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reynold Mason, a lawyer who rose to become the first Caribbean-born state Supreme Court judge, was led out of a Manhattan court in handcuffs yesterday and ordered jailed for refusing to pay nearly $270,000 in court-ordered child support.

Yesterday's court hearing was the first time Mason, who was booted from the bench in 2003, had come to the Manhattan court where his former wife, Tessa Abrams Mason, has been trying to get a 1998 agreement enforced.

Now a Realtor in Georgia, the Grenada-born Mason sat silently as his lawyer, Homer Richardson, argued that the deadbeat dad had no one to borrow money from and begged Justice Joan Lobis not to enforce an arrest warrant issued in April.

"The man came here knowing the consequences," said Richardson. "If he doesn't have the money, he can't pay. He's not going to make it in jail."

Mason told the judge he could no longer afford to pay the same amount of child support he had when he earned more than $136,000 on the bench. He said he has earned $68,000 selling real estate over the past two years.

But Lobis wasn't buying it.

"I have no alternative," she said. "There doesn't seem to be any excusable default."

Yet for his ex-wife, justice came a little too late.

She received notice yesterday that she was being evicted from the Long Island rental home she shares with their three children - ages 16, 14 and 9.

"I'm very sad. I couldn't even look at him," she said. "Why didn't he come with something, even a quarter? I would have worked it out. If I'd seen the money, it would have been a victory. I see no victory here."Abrams Mason, 47, ran her husband's 1994 campaign for the Civil Court bench in Brooklyn, then helped him win election to the state Supreme Court, where he earned $136,700 a year.

But right after he took that seat in 1998, Mason, 57, left his pregnant wife and their two children. She's been suing him for child support since.
In 2003, Mason was kicked off the bench when Abrams Mason told the state Commission on Judicial Conduct that the former landlord-tenant lawyer had once dipped into a client's escrow account.

In a January interview with the Daily News, Abrams Mason claimed her husband paid off local politicians to get the Democratic endorsement for the bench. He vigorously denied the allegations.

</div></div>

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nattydreadgirl</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mountaingal</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i think if a man wants to protect his money from his children's mother, he should actively seek full custody of his children so that way he knows that his money is directly going to them and not to the scorned woman. he should just raise the children of the union and relieve himself of the frustration of thinking that he is supporting a lazy woman who doesn't want to work.

it is, after all, about the money and the woman, and not the kids, right:

[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70400-talktohand.gif[/img]
</div></div> I agree with this 100%, however, if she knew when they were married that he was being unethical/stealing or whatever, and she did not turn him in, then it looks like she was being vindictive to turn him in after he left her. As the saying goes she was cutting off her nose to spite her face..... </div></div>

seeeth deh. shii wass more cancern widd arself dan lookinn out fii ar yuths bess intarest. soo fii shii fii tunn runn ann claim dat de reason y shii lett dem jail da man fii natt payinn child support iss cah shii lookinn out fii ar yuths iss shallow

[MarieK]

Re: scarned oooman

kissteet choopidness