scarned oooman

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mrs. MarieK</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ok but he's nto hurting her he's hurting HIS children.

blu <span style='font-size: 26pt'>what about the children</span> </div></div>

soo lackinn up da man inn jail wass bout da children. sinting wrang wen blakk oomen caan justifii lackinn upp blakk men inn jail bye seyinn itt bout da children. oww iss itt inn da children bess interest fii see dem mekk pappyshow out aff dem jailed fadder natt payinn chile support. sintinn sick ere mrsmariek. blakk oomen rationalieinn lackinn upp blakk man fii money

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

dang dis is ooogly [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/eek.gif[/img]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Abrams Mason claims her ex-husband used his judicial position and connections to fight supporting their children, filed false abuse charges against her in three courts and sought custody even though he never visited....


She and the children live off $500 in monthly workers' compensation she receives after being injured at her Wal-Mart job, plus savings. They are in danger of being evicted from their rented home....

If authorities in Georgia cannot arrest her ex-husband, Abrams Mason plans to enlist the aid of feds to force him to provide for their three children, now ages 16, 14 and 9. She says she understands there is a law empowering federal agents to actively pursue a fugitive owing more that $50,000 in child support.

She also wants to empower other women who are being cheated out of child support and is organizing a May 9 protest march to call for tougher laws against deadbeat parents. The protest is expected to begin at 10 a.m. in front of City Hall.

"I'm hunting him like a dog, like the dog he is," she said. "This is about the kids. There's a parent out there; he has to pay. He started the battle, and I finished the war."


</div></div>

http://www.caribimpact.net/v3_58_politics_current_affairs_3.html

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nattydreadgirl</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The children are always the ones that end up getting hurt in divorce/support issues when the parents (both man and woman) can not put aside their differences, being vindictive, being jealous, being onery...the CHILDREN will always suffer in these situations.

My thinking is that she hurt her children also when she reported him out of angry, payback or whatever. She was getting the child support taken from his paycheck, now he is fired (due to his unethical behavior) He has no JOb, she has no Child Support!

My question that I would like to ask her is why now did she report him? What changed?

My opinion of him is he is a Deadbeat Dad, had a job and they had to garnish his pay, he was obivously not paying on his own will.....however, I feel that due to her anger she failed her kids also. Just my 2cents.... </div></div>

seeeth deh mii luv a ooman wey mekk cents

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

blu..where does it say the man was ever paying?

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Di_Real_Wife</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BOTTOM LINE...MAN HAFFI HELP TEK CARE AH IM PIKNEY DEM AT ANY COST.....CHAT BOUT[size:20pt][/size] </div></div>

even iff imm cyaan afford da cost?

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body">blu..where does it say the man was ever paying? </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Up until he was tossed from the bench, she said, child-support payments of $2,600 a month were being garnished from Mason's paycheck. A $600 monthly alimony order was never paid.</div></div>

secand artikkle mii poas

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Di_Real_Wife</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BOTTOM LINE...MAN HAFFI HELP TEK CARE AH IM PIKNEY DEM AT ANY COST.....CHAT BOUT[size:20pt][/size] </div></div>

even iff imm cyaan afford da cost? </div></div>

Blu..do you really think your argument is logical..dis is what I'm getting fram yu [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img]

woman cyaan mine pickni... dem fe gu look wuk

man cyaan mine pickni..oh well..wha fe do

[MarieK]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body">blu..where does it say the man was ever paying? </div></div>

that's the point. Those of us following this story from teh get go knew that. Dats y mi mek him galang. The court put him on 2,600 and 600 alimony, he NEVER paid a dime after the fraud was exposed

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body">blu..where does it say the man was ever paying? </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Up until he was tossed from the bench, she said, child-support payments of $2,600 a month were being garnished from Mason's paycheck. A $600 monthly alimony order was never paid.</div></div>

secand artikkle mii poas </div></div>


oh yes me did se dat..so how come dem adjust his monthly deductions.. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/confused.gif[/img].but dat nu geem de rite fe juss tap pay..im shoulda pay what he could he's a judge he knows the system..I'm sure he could have it adjusted had he tried..summen nu add up yasso

[St_Bess]

Re: scarned oooman

Blugiant - man fi larn fi kip him teely ina ants nest if him no want to have pickey den him should put him teely backways instead of frontways. People don't have pickey dem kinda way dem only get aids. Damn worthless johncrow. How can a caribbean man say him dont want to tek care of his children? - wuk 1 jab, den anna one, den annada one, clean sh*t do whatever it takes -- taking care of his children is first priority.

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Di_Real_Wife</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BOTTOM LINE...MAN HAFFI HELP TEK CARE AH IM PIKNEY DEM AT ANY COST.....CHAT BOUT[size:20pt][/size] </div></div>

even iff imm cyaan afford da cost? </div></div>

Blu..do you really think your argument is logical..dis is what I'm getting fram yu [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img]

woman cyaan mine pickni... dem fe gu look wuk ar goo pon welfare cah child support iss a farm aff welfare

man cyaan mine pickni..oh well..wha fe do </div></div>wat logic affi doo widd babylon system fii lack upp blakk men

oomen widd yuths more likelee fii gitt welfare. mii wander iff da ooman wass pon welfare

[tsophra]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">wat logic affi doo widd babylon system fii lack upp blakk men

</div></div>

ahh so yu admit yu not being logical..me done den..cyaan argue gainst dat [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70456-eyebrows.gif[/img]

[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70384-praying.gif[/img] fe yu dawta

[blugiant]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: St_Bess</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Blugiant - man fi larn fi kip him teely ina ants nest if him no want to have pickey den him should put him teely backways instead of frontways. People don't have pickey dem kinda way dem only get aids. Damn worthless johncrow. How can a caribbean man say him dont want to tek care of his children? - wuk 1 jab, den anna one, den annada one, clean sh*t do whatever it takes -- taking care of his children is first priority. </div></div>

man fii mine dem yuths. da prablem ear iss dat scarned oomen vindictiveness mekk da man doan waan fii mine imm yuths

[kia027]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kia</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Swedish</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If the man is the father...he is responsible for the child just as much as the mother. Regardless of his financial situation..if one can't support a child...then don't have one. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/rolleyes.gif[/img] nuff said...done talk.. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70374-lipsrsealed.gif[/img] </div></div>soo poor peeps shood natt ave yuths iff dem cyaan mine dem

</div></div>

so wha u a suggest here.. reversible vascetomies? [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img]
yes is the man haffi dweet cause u quick fi seh how ooman trick man into breeding so mek the man tek responsibility fi imself..[img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/bubble.gif[/img] </div></div>

yu wrang kia. mii will defend da poor man rite fii procreate even iff imm cyaan mine imm yuths. mii wood neva support babylonn vasectomies ting </div></div>

Man whe noh mind dem pickney need vascetomies fi mek sure dem no breed no more till dem mine dem existing pickney. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70388-shameonyou.gif[/img]

[Gen]

Re: scarned oooman

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jaded</div><div class="ubbcode-body">blu..where does it say the man was ever paying? </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Up until he was tossed from the bench, she said, child-support payments of $2,600 a month were being garnished from Mason's paycheck. A $600 monthly alimony order was never paid.</div></div>

secand artikkle mii poas </div></div>


oh yes me did se dat..so how come dem adjust his monthly deductions.. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/confused.gif[/img].but dat nu geem de rite fe juss tap pay..im shoulda pay what he could he's a judge he knows the system..I'm sure he could have it adjusted had he tried..summen nu add up yasso </div></div>

was just about to add that, if his salary was cut he should have had the payments adjusted. not too smart is he.