Re: Obama rockets past Clinton in New Hampshire
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: B_P</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Milo Man*</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="color: #FF0000"><span style='font-family: Arial Black'><span style='font-size: 26pt'>CHANGE! CHANGE! CHANGE!</span></span></span> </div></div>
No SUBSTANCE! SUBSTANCE SUBSTANCE! SUBSTANCE! which none of the candidates have really shown. Change for the sake of change is worthless without really talking about why things have to be changed, how that change would benefit everyone, and how to go about realizing that change. </div></div>
They have to better than what's in now?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: B_P</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Milo Man*</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="color: #FF0000"><span style='font-family: Arial Black'><span style='font-size: 26pt'>CHANGE! CHANGE! CHANGE!</span></span></span> </div></div>
No SUBSTANCE! SUBSTANCE SUBSTANCE! SUBSTANCE! which none of the candidates have really shown. Change for the sake of change is worthless without really talking about why things have to be changed, how that change would benefit everyone, and how to go about realizing that change. </div></div>
They have to better than what's in now?
Comment