Re: UWI awarding honorary degree to Observer columnist John
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: johnnycakes</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Littleman,
While there are often protests and considerable activism in the student bodies at U.S. colleges there are far too many academics who are apologists and defenders of U.S. foreign policy. They often talk about the tactics and other side issues of various U.S. atrocities such as the Vietnam Invasion rather than come out, as they should as academics, with the facts. There were very few academics back in the 60's and 70's who told the truth that the U.S. was trying to impose the government (dictatorship) and the economy (capitalist) that THEY wanted and contrary to the wishes of the Vietnamese people.
Academicians and universities in general are more liberal than radical and in general toe the official government line when it comes to controversial (that is outright immoral ) U..S. foreign policy issues.
They are far less independent than one would think they'd be. </div></div>
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">True, true. It has always amazed me that no one ever wondered why the Vietnamese fought so hard, for so long, against over-whelming odds.
IMHO, there must have been nationalist sentiments among Vietnamese, of both the North and the South, who wanted to be free of France's colonialist ambitions, and those of other countries that would seek to impose their will on a sovereign people.
That fact has never really risen to the surface in a lot of the accounts of this most tragic war.</span></span>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: johnnycakes</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Littleman,
While there are often protests and considerable activism in the student bodies at U.S. colleges there are far too many academics who are apologists and defenders of U.S. foreign policy. They often talk about the tactics and other side issues of various U.S. atrocities such as the Vietnam Invasion rather than come out, as they should as academics, with the facts. There were very few academics back in the 60's and 70's who told the truth that the U.S. was trying to impose the government (dictatorship) and the economy (capitalist) that THEY wanted and contrary to the wishes of the Vietnamese people.
Academicians and universities in general are more liberal than radical and in general toe the official government line when it comes to controversial (that is outright immoral ) U..S. foreign policy issues.
They are far less independent than one would think they'd be. </div></div>
<span style="color: #000099"><span style="font-weight: bold">True, true. It has always amazed me that no one ever wondered why the Vietnamese fought so hard, for so long, against over-whelming odds.
IMHO, there must have been nationalist sentiments among Vietnamese, of both the North and the South, who wanted to be free of France's colonialist ambitions, and those of other countries that would seek to impose their will on a sovereign people.
That fact has never really risen to the surface in a lot of the accounts of this most tragic war.</span></span>
Comment