Racism May Be Due To Penis Envy

[blugiant]

Study Finds Racism May Be Due To Penis Envy


A recent study conducted by University of Massachusetts Boston researchers suggests that a large percentage of the “root motivation structure” of most white male on black male racism stems from the inferiority self-concepts concerning member size.The study, which forms part of an extensive series on the psychosocial effects of self-image among a large sample of Conservative and Neo-Conservative Americans between the ages of 23 and 65, has determined that over 97% of direct, as well as indirect, acts of white male on black male racism (including, but not limited to standard racial profiling, police brutality, workplace discrimination, institutional racism and harassment) are all results of subconscious forms of penis envy stemming from engorged racial stereotypes.

Lead researcher Sut Jhally Gupta describes the results of the study as “a major step towards shedding light on one of America’s most prevalent systemic weaknesses next to misogyny and mouth herpes”. Some critics of the study have suggested that Gupta’s results are, at best, inconclusive, stating that the size of the black male penis is “not always inordinately large and mythically thick”, while proponents of Gupta’s study assure its detractors that results are based more on the stereotypical mindsets that activate reactionary violence and discrimination of a subconscious retaliatory nature.

Driving home this point, Gupta adds: “Many critics, mostly white males -not surprisingly- believe that this brand of racism requires that one actually consider the penis size of the black male victim on a conscious level, but we both know how preposterous and gay that sounds. Data simply suggests that given the high incidences of black male stereotypes in our media culture -namely that black men have horse-sized penises- a specific sample of white males are subject to subconscious ‘imagings’ when encountering black males.

Furthermore, in most cases of racism towards black male subjects by white males, these penile imagings activate feelings of inferiority within the latter. Now, if those white males happen to be in positions of power, say a cop or a politician, such activations may result in a reactionary complex. You see, it’s the psyche’s way of helping the white male feel better about his self-esteem, and restore balance to a flustered faggy ego.”

The graduate department overseeing the study has recently received a largely proportioned grant from the Holmes & Holmes Foundation to continue studying the phenomenon. The department’s faculty and research staff are optimistic about the many scientific developments implicit in Gupta’s results such as a promising meta-historical inquiry correlating insecurity feelings of penis size with actual cases of police brutality.

“I’m pretty sure George Zimmerman’s peppy is about half an inch erect and now we might very well have proof that he was being a gigantic pussy that night. In general, we’re fairly certain that our quantitative estimate will conclusively explain that when a white male police officer unjustly abuses a black male, it is due to inner feelings of shame and winkie inferiority as their psyches work on the subconscious belief illustrated thusly as ‘damn, this guy has a power dick while I have a hamster dick with mini baby nuts!

I should totally kick his *** to prove how much more powerful I am.’ It is akin to urinating on another animal to prove dominance.” Notwithstanding, this phase of Sut Jhally Gupta’s study promises to start up a fresh new dialogue within academic circles and beyond. And though the results may indeed prove controversial, white males all over the country may indeed find that the only thing separating them from their black male brothers is an imaginary fat dick lurking in their psyches.

http://nationalreport.net/study-finds-racism-may-due-penis-envy/

[blugiant]

wat a ting

[turtledude]

Article doesn't say if the researchers were males or females or aliens from another planet. quantum jump>>>>what I got out of it is the gov't should offer free penile implants to white males to reduce racism. am I right?

[Emperah]

Dr Frances Cress Welsing speaks on this quite a bit. Genetic Annihilation.

[turtledude]

Dr Frances Cress Welsing speaks on this quite a bit. Genetic Annihilation.

Watched some of her videos and appreciate what she is saying. What blows me away is what the Gates Foundation has been doing "for humanity" which upon closer examination is nothing more than slow genocide.

[blugiant]

Watched some of her videos and appreciate what she is saying. What blows me away is what the Gates Foundation has been doing "for humanity" which upon closer examination is nothing more than slow genocide.

yuh meen eugenics


Bill Gates, Monsanto, and eugenics: How one of the world's wealthiest men is actively promoting a corporate takeover of global agriculture


(NaturalNews) After it was exposed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the philanthropic brainchild of Microsoft founder Bill Gates, purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto back in 2010 valued at more than $23 million, it became abundantly clear that this so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than eradicating disease and feeding the world's poor (http://www.guardian.co.uk). It turns out that the Gates family legacy has long been one of trying to dominate and control the world's systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine, and now agriculture.

The Gates Foundation, aka the tax-exempt Gates Family Trust, is currently in the process of spending billions of dollars in the name of humanitarianism to establish a global food monopoly dominated by genetically-modified (GM) crops and seeds. And based on the Gates family's history of involvement in world affairs, it appears that one of its main goals besides simply establishing corporate control of the world's food supply is to reduce the world's population by a significant amount in the process.

William H. Gates Sr., former head of eugenics group Planned Parenthood
Bill Gates' father, William H. Gates Sr., has long been involved with the eugenics group Planned Parenthood, a rebranded organization birthed out of the American Eugenics Society. In a 2003 interview with PBS' Bill Moyers, Bill Gates admitted that his father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just "reckless breeders" and "human weeds" in need of culling (http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html).

Gates also admitted during the interview that his family's involvement in reproductive issues throughout the years has been extensive, referencing his own prior adherence to the beliefs of eugenicist Thomas Robert Malthus, who believed that populations of the world need to be controlled through reproductive restrictions. Though Gates claims he now holds a different view, it appears as though his foundation's initiatives are just a modified Malthusian approach that much more discreetly reduces populations through vaccines and GMOs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Robert_Malthus).

Gates Foundation has invested heavily in converting Asian, African agricultural systems to GMOs
William Gates Sr.'s association with Planned Parenthood and continued influence in the realm of "population and reproductive health" is significant because Gates Sr. is co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/leade...-gates-sr.aspx). This long-time eugenicist "guides the vision and strategic direction" of the Gates Foundation, which is currently heavily focused on forcing GMOs on Africa via its financing of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).

The Gates Foundation has admittedly given at least $264.5 million in grant commitments to AGRA (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/abou...FFactSheet.pdf), and also reportedly hired Dr. Robert Horsch, a former Monsanto executive for 25 years who developed Roundup, to head up AGRA back in 2006. According to a report published in La Via Campesina back in 2010, 70 percent of AGRA's grantees in Kenya work directly with Monsanto, and nearly 80 percent of the Gates Foundation funding is devoted to biotechnology (http://www.organicconsumers.org/arti...icle_21606.cfm).

The same report explains that the Gates Foundation pledged $880 million in April 2010 to create the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), which is a heavy promoter of GMOs. GAFSP, of course, was responsible for providing $35 million in "aid" to earthquake-shattered Haiti to be used for implementing GMO agricultural systems and technologies.

Back in 2003, the Gates Foundation invested $25 million in "GM (genetically modified) research to develop vitamin and protein-enriched seeds for the world's poor," a move that many international charities and farmers groups vehemently opposed (http://healthfreedoms.org). And in 2008, the Gates Foundation awarded $26.8 million to Cornell University to research GM wheat, which is the next major food crop in the crosshairs of Monsanto's GM food crop pipeline (http://www.organicconsumers.org/arti...icle_21606.cfm).

If you control agriculture, you control the populations of the world
The Gates Foundation's ties with Monsanto and corporate agriculture in general speak volumes about its real agenda, which is to create a monopolistic system of world control in every area of human life. Vaccines, pharmaceuticals, GMOs, reproductive control, weather manipulation, global warming -- these and many other points of entry are the means by which the Gates Foundation is making great strides to control the world by pretending to help improve and save it.

Rather than promote real food sovereignty and address the underlying political and economic issues that breed poverty, Gates and Co. has instead embraced the promotion of corporately-owned and controlled agriculture and medicine paradigms that will only further enslave the world's most impoverished. It is abundantly evident that GMOs have ravished already-impoverished people groups by destroying their native agricultural systems, as has been seen in India (http://www.naturalnews.com/030913_Mo..._suicides.html).

Some may say Gates' endeavors are all about the money, while others may say they are about power and control. Perhaps it is a combination of both, where Gates is still in the business of promoting his own commercial investments, which includes buying shares in Monsanto while simultaneously investing in programs to promote Monsanto.

Whatever the case may be, there is simply no denying that Gates now has a direct interest in seeing Monsanto succeed in spreading GMOs around the world. And since Gates is openly facilitating Monsanto's growth into new markets through his "humanitarian" efforts, it is clear that the Gates family is in bed with Monsanto.

"Although Bill Gates might try to say that the Foundation is not linked to his business, all it proves is the opposite: most of their donations end up favoring the commercial investments of the tycoon, not really "donating" anything, but instead of paying taxes to state coffers, he invests his profits in where it is favorable to him economically, including propaganda from their supposed good intentions," wrote Silvia Ribeiro in the Mexican news source La Jornada back in 2010.

"On the contrary, their 'donations' finance projects as destructive as geoengineering or replacement of natural community medicines for high-tech patented medicines in the poorest areas of the world ... Gates is also engaged in trying to destroy rural farming worldwide, mainly through the 'Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa' (AGRA). It works as a Trojan horse to deprive poor African farmers of their traditional seeds, replacing them with the seeds of their companies first, finally by genetically modified (GM)."

http://www.naturalnews.com/035105_Bill_Gates_Monsanto_eugenics.html

[blugiant]

Article doesn't say if the researchers were males or females or aliens from another planet. quantum jump>>>>what I got out of it is the gov't should offer free penile implants to white males to reduce racism. am I right?

Gupta adds: “Many critics, mostly white males -not surprisingly- believe that this brand of racism requires that one actually consider the penis size of the black male victim on a conscious level, but we both know how preposterous and gay that sounds. Data simply suggests that given the high incidences of black male stereotypes in our media culture -namely that black men have horse-sized penises- a specific sample of white males are subject to subconscious ‘imagings’ when encountering black males.

Furthermore, in most cases of racism towards black male subjects by white males, these penile imagings activate feelings of inferiority within the latter. Now, if those white males happen to be in positions of power, say a cop or a politician, such activations may result in a reactionary complex. You see, it’s the psyche’s way of helping the white male feel better about his self-esteem, and restore balance to a flustered faggy ego.”

wat bout asians? cah itt sund like de lead researcher, Sut Jhally Gupta , was wan

de studee iss bout oww fe mekk oyinbo men feel less insecure to reduce racism

"white males are subject to subconscious ‘imagings’ when encountering black males."

[turtledude]

Blu, I was thinking more about the vaccination programs in Africa that are causing sterility.

[kia027]

I guess that may explain Kim Jung-Un's actions ?!?!?

[blugiant]

Blu, I was thinking more about the vaccination programs in Africa that are causing sterility.

WTF! Bill Gates Depopulation Plans Caught On Camera MONSANTO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TyAJZVARPw

Dr. Frances Cress Welsing: SCANDAL & SLAVE MOVIE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8Em4m1eQ8s

[blugiant]

I guess that may explain Kim Jung-Un's actions ?!?!?

natt quite cah dat bout intra-racial actions natt interracial actions.

Some critics of the study have suggested that Gupta’s results are, at best, inconclusive, stating that the size of the black male penis is “not always inordinately large and mythically thick”, while proponents of Gupta’s study assure its detractors that results are based more on the stereotypical mindsets that activate reactionary violence and discrimination of a subconscious retaliatory nature.

[Blackstar*]

This is not surprising. White lynch mobs often cut off victims' sexual organs and we have the most recent incident where a white male police officer rendered a black youth impotent by using excess force during a pat down.

[blugiant]

This is not surprising. White lynch mobs often cut off victims' sexual organs and we have the most recent incident where a white male police officer rendered a black youth impotent by using excess force during a pat down.

imagine lynch mob, moaslee oyinbo men, cuttinn awf a blakk man penis, homo ting dat. female oyinbo afficer grabbinn a blakk yuth crotch so hard cause actual damage to imm organ.

tink pon zimmerman huntinn blakk yuths cah inn da back aff imm head wass wance dem go blakk imm will forever cum upp short

[blugiant]

A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ON BLACK MALE SEXUALITY & RACISM IN AMERICA, PT 1


In my Ph.D. dissertation I hypothesized that in the Ante-bellum South (the period prior to the civil war), and again during the Great Migration to the Northern states by many Southern Blacks, the fear of Black male sexuality and perceived sexual vibrancy caused white men to respond in a violent, sadistic manner. I posit that throughout American history, a patriarchal White dominated society has suffered from two primary societal disorders with regard to Black males and their sexuality. I am credited by that same organization with coining the term, “Fear of Continued Existence” to define the first.

As a result of my research I contend that in any patriarchal white dominated society there is an underlying dread by many white males of the perceived mathematical probability of genetic annihilation by black males. This trepidation, I maintain, is the root cause of much of the atrocities perpetrated on the black male by Europeans from the earliest interaction between the white women and the black male. Further, I posit that there is an underpinning of alarm that is inherent to any white patriarchal society as related to the transmission of dominant hereditary characteristics, such as color, from the parent organisms to their children.

This theory is not new and has been corroborated by many social scientists and psychiatrist; many, who cannot avoid the query concerning the requisite desire among white men during the Ante-bellum period to physically castrate the black man as a means of punishment when whites who commit the same, or worse crimes, even against members of their own race, never received similar punishment.

Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, a prominent Psychiatrist developed the 'Cress Theory of Color Confrontation'. This theory explores the practice of white supremacy and theorizes that during slavery, white men realized feelings of confirmed genetic inferiority as a result of the inherent genetic dominance and biological inheritance of darker skin over a genetic recessive state such as albinism.

In addition, according to noted scholar and intellectual Cornel West, in “The Cornel West Reader”, (1999) states, “White supremacy ideology is based first and foremost on the degradation of Black bodies in order to control them (and) “…the repeated castrations of lynched black men cry out for serious psycho cultural explanation.”

Gregor Johann Mendel, a German scientist, commonly called the father of genetics proved that the inheritance of traits follows particular laws. These proven tenants were later named after him and are known as ‘Mendelian Inheritance’. The theories of Mendelian Inheritance when integrated with the ‘chromosome theory of inheritance’ developed by American embryologist, Thomas Hunt Morgan were integrated and became the theoretical core of ‘Forward Genetics’. One theory is that pigment, or melanin, the substance that gives the skin its natural color, is genetically dominant in people of color. Dr Sheafe theorizes that beginning with American slavery and continuing into the 1950’s, many castrations were conducted by sadistic White males who harbored feelings of sexual inferiority and subsequently developed a hatred of the only symbol of Black dominance, the Black penis.

I further theorize that many racist individuals, after concluding that genetic dominance is literally transferred through the black penis in a sperm cell, which then joins an ovum to form a zygote, a single cell, with a complete set of chromosomes, which then eventually develops into a embryo of color, lashed out violently at the object of their consternation, the black man’s penis.

In basic terms, white genetic color cannot produce any other color but white, whereas black can produce endless colors as proven with the many skin complexions of humans throughout the world. In understanding the thought mechanism behind the castration of black men in the South, one can safety theorize that, in part, it was because the American concepts of slavery versus freedom since the Revolutionary War were predicated and enforced by the notion of skin color and by sexual cohabitation and the production of offspring, the perception by misinformed individuals was that the Caucasian race could be eventually annihilated genetically by individuals with dark skin. The contention then becomes this theory produced feelings of inferiority, fear and hatred within the patriarchal society in the Antebellum South and thru the 1950’s. One of my primary contentions is that, “Fear of genetic dominance is the basis of European preeminence dogma”.

The second term I am credited with is, “Osiris Envy”. Specifically, this would be described as a spiteful malice, resentment and fear of the virile sexual potency of black males by white men in a patriarchal society. I theorize that in most white patriarchal dominated societies there is an underpinning of alarm with regard to black male sexuality.

Lev Vygotsky, a Soviet developmental psychologist, states in Ape, Primitive Man, and Child: Essays in the History of Behavior, (1992) “The behavior of contemporary civilized man is the product not only of biological evolution or childhood development; it is also the product of historical development.” In my opinion, the historical development of the European in the world is not one of harmonious cohabitation with other races but instead is ripe with examples of forced imperialism and misdeeds perpetrated as a result of a foreboding sense of sexual inadequacy, cultural entitlement, fear of domination and a false point of view towards the supremacy of the European. Not to say that early childhood factors are not present in this behavior, to a large degree they are, but historically, the white patriarchal society is ripe with examples of treachery, dishonesty, and deceitfulness toward others of non-European descent; and unfortunately, all carried out in the name of Christianity. During slavery, Southern hypocrisy and feelings of latent sexual inferiority are clearly confirmed; hypocrisy that deliberately distorted the beliefs inherent in Christianity and inferiority that manifests itself through their actions. These societies of predominant religious hypocrites choose to distort Christianity for their own self-centered aims and sexual inferior notions. Another prime example would be the un-Christian-like treatment of the Native American. (Broken treaties, empty promises, forced sterilizations, etc) According to noted author, J. A. Rogers, in, From Superman to Man, (1996) “The doctrine of inequality is emphatically a science of white people; it is they who invented it.”

I further contend that significant measures of Sigmund Freud’s theories on penis envy were left unsound. Sigmund Freud, commonly referred to as “the father of psychoanalysis”, was a prominent Jewish-Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist. I contends that Freud failed to attend to the possibility of male-on-male penis envy. Accordingly, it becomes conceivable that self-doubting males within a given population could grow increasingly obsessed with feelings of latent sexual inferiority fueled by the popular myths and stereotypes perpetuated in that culture. As my research demonstrates, imbued in self-doubt, shrinking self-esteem and veiled homosexual desires, indeed non-Black males throughout history have manifested the same latent sexual tendencies posited in Freudian "Penis envy" supposition, which, I posits, inaccurately theorized only occurred in females. Further, I argue that the so called penis envy phenomenon is just as prevalent in males-of-males as Freud posited it is in females-of-males. As a direct result of these contentions, it becomes impossible to examine the sexual character and potency of Black sexuality without a prerequisite, in-depth exploration of the stigmatizing of difference along racial characteristics. For me, these two concepts are cardinal and indispensable.

I assert in my Ph.D. dissertation, “If an individual claims to have a basic understanding of physics, they should be able to explain why the planets revolve around the sun. If another professes an understanding of biology they should be able to give an explanation of nature’s basic theory of dynamic equilibrium or explain where babies come from, and, although chemistry does not have any single grand orthodox question, there are some everyday phenomena that an individual claiming general knowledge of that subject should be able to clarify. Thus, in order to even moderately seek to comprehend the complexities of black male sexuality, to reasonably aspire to understand the Black individual, or to even dimly undertake to dissect the mental processes and behavior involving the various spheres of conduct and human activity of both the oppressed ancestor of the modern African American and the earliest imperialist, colonizing European, it is inescapable that one have an inclusive grasp of racism and its effects on black sexuality. Black sexuality encompasses an origin of the many myths, stereotypes and folklore surrounding the broad range of sexual issues surrounding the extensive array of attitudes, issues, behavior and processes, including sexual identity, conduct and the social, cultural, anthropological, religious, spiritual, psychological and physiological aspect. Thus, in the same manner that the atom is the foundation upon which the most minimal scientific study of chemistry is built, racism is the initial platform on which the study of black sexuality must commence. In precisely the equivalent manner that the relationship between the atom and the subatomic particles of electron, protons and neutrons is unavoidable and compulsory and cannot be considered without the other, black sexuality cannot be accurately examined without a complete and comprehensive examination of European domination and racism.”

http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/a_theoretical_persective_on_black_male_sexuality_in_america

[blugiant]

A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ON BLACK MALE SEXUALITY & RACISM IN AMERICA, PT 1

In Summary

In my opinion, race and racism is the core, the crux and must be the focal points of any intelligent discussion on Black sexuality. I theorize that, based on historical documentation, the perceived libido, black-male-sexual-energy and vitality has always been a site of contention for certain peoples. Fear of black sexuality from ancient history forward is approached in my research as a discourse on sexual insufficiency, trepidation, malfunction and myriad underlying psychosis of the oppressing fraction. I posit that one of the roots causes of black-male-castration and lynching in the Ante-bellum south and afterwards is a latent attraction/jealousy between the sexual object, the white male, and the sexual aim, the black male. Furthermore, these lynching-castrations that were so prevalent throughout American history were mostly carried out by individuals who identify and model many behaviors and beliefs after a larger group of individuals with whom they identify, subsequently a form of group psychosis/paranoia developed. This social tendency to think in a group consciousness in humans is called the herding instinct, which when negatively applied, leads to the mob mentality.

Within the same boundaries and in the same way that the Alfred Kinsey findings were considered revolutionary, my research contains similar demarcations. My surveys (www.USAMensNetwork.com) & (www.USAWomensNetwork.com) focus primarily on black sexuality and the enveloping myths. To date, this has never been conducted; racism and myths as part in parcel with European generational sexual psychosis.

My sexual research endeavors to:
Explore the six intersections of:
- Sexuality, and the latent and core feelings of Patriarchal Southern societies feelings of inferiority and inversion (as defined by Freud: homosexuality)
- Fear and the subliminal European’s ‘Fear of continued existence.’
- Coping strategies and the underlying hatred of White oppression by African Americans
- Racism, against Blacks and the essential age-old fairy tale mythology of White superiority
- Mental genocide and the ‘generational post traumatic stress disorder disease’ as it relates to black sexuality (Reid, Omar, G., Sekou Mims & Larry Higginbottom, 2005)
- The role of religion and the traditional Black church’s response, as it relates to Black sexuality
I believe there is a need for this kind of research. Alfred Kinsey conducted a sexual survey on the sexual practices of white Americans and Canadians, and although he administered his survey to Negroes and other racial groups he did not include the results in his final data analysis.” Kinsey himself states in his 1948 work, Sexual Behavior In The Human Male “…we do not yet have enough histories of Negroes to warrant their inclusion in the analysis that have been made in the present volume.” Subsequently Kinsey data as it relates to the sexual practices of Blacks and other races are, by his own admission, invalid and inadmissible when researching those not contained in his study.
Dr Sheafe states, “Hopefully, it is from this work that contemporary society can begin the process of self-examination with regard to its projected negative stereotypical beliefs about Black men. From this point of origination dialogues may commence thus leading to a more honest and open comprehension of the unuttered fears and cultural miscomprehension surrounding Black sexuality and White sexual perceptions.”

http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/a_theoretical_persective_on_black_male_sexuality_in_america