Time for calm - and answers
Furious over the eyewitness videos showing a BART police officer shooting an unarmed man in the back on New Year's Eve and frustrated by BART's inadequate public communication about the event, protesters in Oakland have taken their feelings to the streets.
Their anger is understandable, though the violence and vandalism are inexcusable.
Officials within both BART and Oakland should move more assertively to address the public's questions and concerns about this shooting. We've seen all the elements of this story too many times before before - eyewitness videos, a secretive police force, delayed official actions in response to a tragedy, and mounting public anger.
At a meeting of BART's Board of Directors Thursday, angry members of the public outlined their demands: an independent oversight board for the BART police, and for BART officials to turn over the investigation to state and federal authorities. Both of these demands are fully warranted, and members of the BART board should implement them. It's unconscionable that BART officials dragged their feet on interviewing the officer involved for days and days - and now they have no chance to do so, because he resigned. Also, an "internal investigation" won't be public or transparent, so the community would be left to speculate, and probably grow even angrier, about what happened.
Regarding the independent oversight board, it's a wonder that BART doesn't have one already. San Francisco and Berkeley both have ones for their police departments, and this isn't the first time that BART has gotten complaints for what Adam Keigwin, state Sen. Leland Yee's communications director, calls a "cowboy attitude."
Yee has just filed legislation to create an independent oversight board for BART police. "We've heard from constituents in the past that they (BART police officials) haven't dealt with situations in a way that's appropriate," Keigwin said. "The BART board of directors have had years to institute some sort of mechanism for the public to be heard, and they haven't done that."
Now's the time.
This article appeared on page B - 8 of the San Francisco Chronicle
story
Furious over the eyewitness videos showing a BART police officer shooting an unarmed man in the back on New Year's Eve and frustrated by BART's inadequate public communication about the event, protesters in Oakland have taken their feelings to the streets.
Their anger is understandable, though the violence and vandalism are inexcusable.
Officials within both BART and Oakland should move more assertively to address the public's questions and concerns about this shooting. We've seen all the elements of this story too many times before before - eyewitness videos, a secretive police force, delayed official actions in response to a tragedy, and mounting public anger.
At a meeting of BART's Board of Directors Thursday, angry members of the public outlined their demands: an independent oversight board for the BART police, and for BART officials to turn over the investigation to state and federal authorities. Both of these demands are fully warranted, and members of the BART board should implement them. It's unconscionable that BART officials dragged their feet on interviewing the officer involved for days and days - and now they have no chance to do so, because he resigned. Also, an "internal investigation" won't be public or transparent, so the community would be left to speculate, and probably grow even angrier, about what happened.
Regarding the independent oversight board, it's a wonder that BART doesn't have one already. San Francisco and Berkeley both have ones for their police departments, and this isn't the first time that BART has gotten complaints for what Adam Keigwin, state Sen. Leland Yee's communications director, calls a "cowboy attitude."
Yee has just filed legislation to create an independent oversight board for BART police. "We've heard from constituents in the past that they (BART police officials) haven't dealt with situations in a way that's appropriate," Keigwin said. "The BART board of directors have had years to institute some sort of mechanism for the public to be heard, and they haven't done that."
Now's the time.
This article appeared on page B - 8 of the San Francisco Chronicle
story
Comment