Slut Shaming Double Standard

[Tropicana]

It's interesting. When a man slut shames a woman, he usually gets a or a We see that in response to blu's slutty mzungu playtings thread. Other men who post slut shaming material on the Internet get the same response.

When a woman slut shames another woman who is a total slut ho, other women beat her up and gang up on her. I experience this regularly on here. So do other women who post slut shaming material on the Internet.

Finally, women who defend the virtues of keeping of sex within the boundaries of marriage and oppose pre-marital sex are mocked and ridiculed.

Let's discuss this blatant double standard on here and elsewhere.

[twiney]

Do you think you and others would get a different response if you highlighted the benefits or reasons for keeping sex within the boundaries of marriage without assigning labels and putting down other women? Do you have a good enough argument that can stand on it's own so if Jesus should start writing in the sand you wouldn't be one of the accusers who would have to "tek weh u self" ie let him who is without sin cast the first stone?

Often when one has to highlight the negatives of the other side to prove their side it means they are not convinced or do not have evidence to support their belief. I would suggest that you take a different approach to defending what you believe to be true and you may see a different response. In fact people who you think are ganging up and ridiculing you might be surprised they start supporting you. (Psst they may share some of the same fundamental beliefs you have but cant agree with how you voice your opinions).

The person who claims to believe in evolution and that God does not exist is most often picking a fight with the person who believes in God and that he created everything because his belief is a theory. I am sure you don't want to appear threatened by that which goes against what you believe.

BTW the Women's Lib Movement tells a woman it's her body so she can do what ever she wants even if the behaviour is perceived by others to be slutty.

[evanovitch]

It's interesting. When a man slut shames a woman, he usually gets a or a We see that in response to blu's slutty mzungu playtings thread. Other men who post slut shaming material on the Internet get the same response.

When a woman slut shames another woman who is a total slut ho, other women beat her up and gang up on her. I experience this regularly on here. So do other women who post slut shaming material on the Internet.

Finally, women who defend the virtues of keeping of sex within the boundaries of marriage and oppose pre-marital sex are mocked and ridiculed.

Let's discuss this blatant double standard on here and elsewhere.

AGAIN I ASK, HOW DO U COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT U R BEING GANGED UP AGAINST WHEN U , BY UR OWN ADMISSION, HAVE BLOCKED ALL THE OTHER POSTERS…THE ONLY ONES U SEEM TO READ R BLU, JAH YOUT, LONEWOLF N RICHD…DEM A SNITCH TO U


AS TO BASHING U, U DO USELF A DISSERVICE NOT TO MENTION CALL INTO QUESTION THE EDUCATION U LOVE TO REFER TO….NO ONE CAN READ WITH COMPREHENSION N SEE WAT U DO AS 'DEFEND THE VIRTUES OF KEEPING SEX WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF MARRIAGE ETC'

FRANKLY I THINK U DO WAT U DO TO TRY TO REMAIND RELEVANT N SADLY U SEEM TO BELIEVE THAT POSTING HERE MAKES U RELEVANT RATHER THAN POSTING HER BEING AN AVENUE TO SHARE INFO…UR SEEMING FASCINATION WITH SEX N HOW OTHERS MIGHT BE HAVING IT N DOING IT SPEAKS VOULUME AS TO WHAT U MIGHT BE..

SMADDY TRANSLATE DIS FI HAR AS I AM IGNORE….EVEN AS THIS HER THREAD WAS STARTED AS A DIRECT RESPONSE TO MINE….but then i don't want to fall into her way of thinking but i don't have her on ignore so the timing n the topic mek a one draw fi dat conclusion…

[twiney]

AGAIN I ASK, HOW DO U COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT U R BEING GANGED UP AGAINST WHEN U , BY UR OWN ADMISSION, HAVE BLOCKED ALL THE OTHER POSTERS…THE ONLY ONES U SEEM TO READ R BLU, JAH YOUT, LONEWOLF N RICHD…DEM A SNITCH TO U


AS TO BASHING U, U DO USELF A DISSERVICE NOT TO MENTION CALL INTO QUESTION THE EDUCATION U LOVE TO REFER TO….NO ONE CAN READ WITH COMPREHENSION N SEE WAT U DO AS 'DEFEND THE VIRTUES OF KEEPING SEX WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF MARRIAGE ETC'

FRANKLY I THINK U DO WAT U DO TO TRY TO REMAIND RELEVANT N SADLY U SEEM TO BELIEVE THAT POSTING HERE MAKES U RELEVANT RATHER THAN POSTING HER BEING AN AVENUE TO SHARE INFO…UR SEEMING FASCINATION WITH SEX N HOW OTHERS MIGHT BE HAVING IT N DOING IT SPEAKS VOULUME AS TO WHAT U MIGHT BE..

SMADDY TRANSLATE DIS FI HAR AS I AM IGNORE….EVEN AS THIS HER THREAD WAS STARTED AS A DIRECT RESPONSE TO MINE….but then i don't want to fall into her way of thinking but i don't have her on ignore so the timing n the topic mek a one draw fi dat conclusion…

You know mi never si you post till you mention it.

[kia027]

AGAIN I ASK, HOW DO U COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT U R BEING GANGED UP AGAINST WHEN U , BY UR OWN ADMISSION, HAVE BLOCKED ALL THE OTHER POSTERS…THE ONLY ONES U SEEM TO READ R BLU, JAH YOUT, LONEWOLF N RICHD…DEM A SNITCH TO U


AS TO BASHING U, U DO USELF A DISSERVICE NOT TO MENTION CALL INTO QUESTION THE EDUCATION U LOVE TO REFER TO….NO ONE CAN READ WITH COMPREHENSION N SEE WAT U DO AS 'DEFEND THE VIRTUES OF KEEPING SEX WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF MARRIAGE ETC'

FRANKLY I THINK U DO WAT U DO TO TRY TO REMAIND RELEVANT N SADLY U SEEM TO BELIEVE THAT POSTING HERE MAKES U RELEVANT RATHER THAN POSTING HER BEING AN AVENUE TO SHARE INFO…UR SEEMING FASCINATION WITH SEX N HOW OTHERS MIGHT BE HAVING IT N DOING IT SPEAKS VOULUME AS TO WHAT U MIGHT BE..

SMADDY TRANSLATE DIS FI HAR AS I AM IGNORE….EVEN AS THIS HER THREAD WAS STARTED AS A DIRECT RESPONSE TO MINE….but then i don't want to fall into her way of thinking but i don't have her on ignore so the timing n the topic mek a one draw fi dat conclusion…

You know mi never si you post till you mention it.

I dont think there is a double standard. When someone needs to put others down to make a statement about their supposed beliefs, just makes them appear completely desperate for attention due to the lack irl.

[evanovitch]

I dont think there is a double standard. When someone needs to put others down to make a statement about their supposed beliefs, just makes them appear completely desperate for attention due to the lack irl.

is one ting for us to discuss race and all the areas of life dat it affecting but every post she makes has the derogatory reference to women….if is not baggy dropping , it is slutting….and then she seems fascinated with Bob n his kids but doesn't seem to equate the multiple partners n children of said multiple partners as pants dropping or ****ing all over the place….

what made me respond is har partner who will question if i put a phrase or statement in the OCCASIONAL heading but has never had an issue with her CONSTANT baggy dropping or slut references …..the few she seem to feel on par with seem to really have the said mind set….

mercy….we all have flaws n fall short of who we should be ,n occasionally trow stone but dang…n frankly since everyone who WOULD discuss with har r on ignore, y the hell she run around doing this…exhale…she juss deh eena di gal craw like she vex dat she no look like Halle but she get a man….n me know dat despite har nuff denial she vex seh is a white one too….

we all Jamaican enough fi read we one another….


mi always a leave dis site n come back…time fi leave again….so disappointing

[twiney]

is one ting for us to discuss race and all the areas of life dat it affecting but every post she makes has the derogatory reference to women….if is not baggy dropping , it is slutting….and then she seems fascinated with Bob n his kids but doesn't seem to equate the multiple partners n children of said multiple partners as pants dropping or ****ing all over the place….

what made me respond is har partner who will question if i put a phrase or statement in the OCCASIONAL heading but has never had an issue with her CONSTANT baggy dropping or slut references …..the few she seem to feel on par with seem to really have the said mind set….

mercy….we all have flaws n fall short of who we should be ,n occasionally trow stone but dang…n frankly since everyone who WOULD discuss with har r on ignore, y the hell she run around doing this…exhale…she juss deh eena di gal craw like she vex dat she no look like Halle but she get a man….n me know dat despite har nuff denial she vex seh is a white one too….

we all Jamaican enough fi read we one another….


mi always a leave dis site n come back…time fi leave again….so disappointing

Dont leave cause of anybody Vannie. I find many of the articles you post interesting plus you and wahalla share info i learn from.

[Tropicana]

Do you think you and others would get a different response if you highlighted the benefits or reasons for keeping sex within the boundaries of marriage without assigning labels and putting down other women?

Perhaps.

Do you have a good enough argument that can stand on it's own so if Jesus should start writing in the sand you wouldn't be one of the accusers who would have to "tek weh u self" ie let him who is without sin cast the first stone?

Yes. I am not a member of the possee.

Often when one has to highlight the negatives of the other side to prove their side it means they are not convinced or do not have evidence to support their belief.

Not at all. To me the benefits of pre-marital chastity are as obvious as the nose on one's face and it is not necessary to point them out. Are you saying people really don't them? It's kind of basica content don't you think?

I would suggest that you take a different approach to defending what you believe to be true and you may see a different response. In fact people who you think are ganging up and ridiculing you might be surprised they start supporting you. (Psst they may share some of the same fundamental beliefs you have but cant agree with how you voice your opinions).

The person who claims to believe in evolution and that God does not exist is most often picking a fight with the person who believes in God and that he created everything because his belief is a theory. I am sure you don't want to appear threatened by that which goes against what you believe.

I am definitely not threatened in any way shape or form.

BTW the Women's Lib Movement tells a woman it's her body so she can do what ever she wants even if the behaviour is perceived by others to be slutty.

The Bible teaches that our bodies are the temple of the holy spirit. This "it's my body and I'll do what I want with it is a perversion of the women's lib movement. It is base don the belief that since men have been behaving badly, women should have the right to behave just as badly. Same argument was raised about smoking with dire consequences for women's health.

Sexual immorality and its consequences are just as deadly.

[Tropicana]

I dont think there is a double standard. When someone needs to put others down to make a statement about their supposed beliefs, just makes them appear completely desperate for attention due to the lack irl.

Slut shaming is not a way of defending one's beliefs. It is a way of shaming the slut into modifying her behaviour.

[Tropicana]

It is a tad hypocritical when smaddy who used to object STRONGLY when tourists used to speak about about their slutty and nasty behaviour and post inappropriate pictures on here is now objecting to slut shaming.

Disclaimer: Mi not calling NO name.

[blugiant]

It is a tad hypocritical when smaddy who used to object STRONGLY when tourists used to speak about about their slutty and nasty behaviour and post inappropriate pictures on here is now objecting to slut shaming.

Disclaimer: Mi not calling NO name.

shi raisinn intarestinn pint evan

[evanovitch]

It is a tad hypocritical when smaddy who used to object STRONGLY when tourists used to speak about about their slutty and nasty behaviour and post inappropriate pictures on here is now objecting to slut shaming.

Disclaimer: Mi not calling NO name.

it is a huge difference between discussing an issue, a real issue, as i did back then N WHAT U A DO DAILY….n if u will remember i discussed an issue, in the moment….….Jamaica is personal to di I….how she is portrayed by some on a Jcan website was n still is important to di I

u run around starting posts with the words SLUT n BAGGY DROPPY for what exactly, shock value…..?




.

[blugiant]

it is a huge difference between discussing an issue, a real issue, as i did back then N WHAT U A DO DAILY….n if u will remember i discussed an issue, in the moment….….Jamaica is personal to di I….how she is portrayed by some on a Jcan website was n still is important to di I

u run around starting posts with the words SLUT n BAGGY DROPPY for what exactly, shock value…..?




.

evan so yuh tryinn fe be da arbitar aff wat da real issue iss?

slackness iss slackness ann itt sund like yuh tryinn fe pick ann choose instead being consistant

[evanovitch]

shi raisinn intarestinn pint evan

u probably pointed out to her that it MIGHT BE a point, seeing dat u have also reduced urself to theatrics ….SAD really….'interesting' as well as being a 'point'…REALLY…there WAS a time wen u raised real issues…ala being able to use an accepted synonym for 'white' ….sad

[Tropicana]

slackness iss slacknes