ADDRESS DELIVERED BY PROFESSOR SIR HILARY BECKLES, CHAIRMAN OF THE
CARICOM REPARATIONS COMMISSION, HOUSE OF COMMONS, PARLIAMENT
OF GREAT BRITAIN , COMMITTEE ROOM 14, THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2014, 9:00 P.M.
Madam Chair, the distinguished member of Parliament for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, Diane Abbott, other distinguished members of the House of Lords, and House of Commons, Excellencies of the Diplomatic Corp, colleagues at the head table, Ladies and Gentlemen.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
1:
I speak this evening, in this honourable chamber of the House
of Commons, as Chairman of the Caricom Commission on
Reparations. My colleagues of the Commission are tasked
with the preparation and presentation of the evidentiary basis
for a contemporary truth: that the Government of Great Britain,
and other European states that were the beneficiaries of
enrichment from the enslavement of African peoples, the
genocide of indigenous communities, and the deceptive breach
of contract and trust in respect of Indians and other Asians
brought to the plantations under indenture, have a case to
answer in respect of reparatory justice.
2:
The case of genocide is not only
in respect of our decimated native community. It is also
important to recognize the genocidal aspect of chattel
slavery in the Caribbean . British slave ships brought
5.5 million enslaved Africans into their Caribbean colonies
over 180 years. When slavery was abolished in 1838 they were
just 800,000 persons remaining. That is, a
retention/survival rate of 15%. The regime of enslavement
was crafted by policies and attitudes that were clearly
genocidal. Jamaica received 1.5 million Africans. Only
300,000 remained at Emancipation (20%).
3:
Barbados received 600,000 Africans. Only 83,000
remained at Emancipation (14%).
This case is for the Caricom governments to
present on behalf of its citizens. I am sure that in its
presentation there will be due regard for the principles of
diplomacy and development cooperation - for which they have
long distinguished themselves. This process will bring
honour and dignity to the people of the Caribbean as well as
to the people of Great Britain and Europe .
4:
Caricom governments, like the
government of Great Britain , represent nations that are
independent and equal. As such, they should proceed on the
basis of their legitimate equality, without fear of
retribution, in the best interest of humanity, and for a
better future for us all.
5:
I am honoured to be asked to
speak in this historic parliament of the people of Great
Britain . Like you I am aware that this Parliament prepared
the official political basis of the crimes that defined the
colonial past. It is here, in this House, that the evil
system of slavery, and genocide, were established. This
House passed laws, framed fiscal policies, and enforced the
crimes that have produced harmful legacies and persistent
suffering now in need of repair.
6:
This House also made emancipation from
slavery and independence from colonialism an empowering
reality. It is in here, we now imagine, that laws for
reparatory justice can be conceptualized and implemented. It
is in here, we believe, that the terrible wrongs of the past
can be corrected, and humanity finally and truthfully
liberated from the shame and guilt that have followed these
historical crimes.
7:
We must believe in the corrective
power of this Parliament to respond positively to this
present challenge, and in the process free itself from the
bondage of its own sins and crimes. Without this belief our
journey here this evening would be lacking integrity, and
without a doubt, would be a useless exercise.
8:
But I speak in this honourable House
this evening, not only as chairman of a rightfully
constituted commission that is peopled by some of our finest
Caribbean citizens, and who have been selected by our
distinguished Presidents and Prime Ministers, but as a
Caribbean person with an affinity for this country. I was
raised and educated here. I came from the Caribbean to this
country as a child; I grew to maturity here; and was
educated here in a fine university that has distinguished
itself in the Liberal-Progressive pedagogy of the
nation.
9:
Great Britain , therefore, is my second
home and I care for it as I care for my first home, the
Great Caribbean . I wish for Great Britain , as I do for the
Great Caribbean , peace and prosperity. I wish that their
shared past, painful though it has been, will be transformed
into a moral force of mutual respect and development
cooperation. It is for these reasons that I have joined
the Caribbean and global movement for reparatory justice. I
believe we can settle this case within the context of
diplomatic initiatives that are consistent with our status
as equal nations.
10:
The crimes committed against the
indigenous, African, and Asian peoples of the Caribbean are
well documented. We know of the 250 years of slave trading,
chattel slavery, and the following 100 years of colonial
oppression.
11:
Slavery was ended in 1838, only to be replaced by a century
of racial apartheid, including the denigration of Asian
people. Indigenous genocide, African chattel slavery and
genocide, and Asian contract slavery, were three acts of a
single play – a single process by which the British state
forcefully extracted wealth from the Caribbean resulting in
its persistent, endemic poverty.
12:
I wish to comment,
as a result, on the 1833 Act of Emancipation, and how this
august Parliament betrayed the enslaved people of the
Caribbean by forcing them to pay more than 50% of the cost
of their own emancipation. This is an aspect of the history
long hidden from public view. We know, for example, that
this Parliament in 1833 determined that the 800,000 enslaved
people in the Caribbean were worth, as chattel property,
£47 million. This was their assessed market
value. We know that this Parliament
determined that all slave owners should receive just and
fair compensation for the official taking away of their
property. We know that this Parliament provided the
sum of £20 million in grants to the slave owners as fair
compensation for the loss of their human chattel.
13:
And we know that this Parliament determined that the
enslaved people would receive none of this compensation. The
argument made in this House was that ‘property’ cannot
receive property compensation. This Parliament, in its
emancipation Act, upheld the law that black people were not
human, but property.
14:
What this Parliament has hid from the
world is that it also determined that the remaining £27
million would be paid by the enslaved people to their
enslavers, by means of a 4 year period of free labour called
the Apprenticeship.
15:
This period of additional free labour by the emancipated
represented the enforced extraction of £27 million by the
state. It was a cruel and shameful method of legislating
Emancipation by forcing the enslaved to pay more than 50% of
the financial cost of their own freedom. The £20 million
paid the enslavers by this Parliament was less than the £27
million paid by the enslaved to the enslavers as dictated by
this House.
CARICOM REPARATIONS COMMISSION, HOUSE OF COMMONS, PARLIAMENT
OF GREAT BRITAIN , COMMITTEE ROOM 14, THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2014, 9:00 P.M.
Madam Chair, the distinguished member of Parliament for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, Diane Abbott, other distinguished members of the House of Lords, and House of Commons, Excellencies of the Diplomatic Corp, colleagues at the head table, Ladies and Gentlemen.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
1:
I speak this evening, in this honourable chamber of the House
of Commons, as Chairman of the Caricom Commission on
Reparations. My colleagues of the Commission are tasked
with the preparation and presentation of the evidentiary basis
for a contemporary truth: that the Government of Great Britain,
and other European states that were the beneficiaries of
enrichment from the enslavement of African peoples, the
genocide of indigenous communities, and the deceptive breach
of contract and trust in respect of Indians and other Asians
brought to the plantations under indenture, have a case to
answer in respect of reparatory justice.
2:
The case of genocide is not only
in respect of our decimated native community. It is also
important to recognize the genocidal aspect of chattel
slavery in the Caribbean . British slave ships brought
5.5 million enslaved Africans into their Caribbean colonies
over 180 years. When slavery was abolished in 1838 they were
just 800,000 persons remaining. That is, a
retention/survival rate of 15%. The regime of enslavement
was crafted by policies and attitudes that were clearly
genocidal. Jamaica received 1.5 million Africans. Only
300,000 remained at Emancipation (20%).
3:
Barbados received 600,000 Africans. Only 83,000
remained at Emancipation (14%).
This case is for the Caricom governments to
present on behalf of its citizens. I am sure that in its
presentation there will be due regard for the principles of
diplomacy and development cooperation - for which they have
long distinguished themselves. This process will bring
honour and dignity to the people of the Caribbean as well as
to the people of Great Britain and Europe .
4:
Caricom governments, like the
government of Great Britain , represent nations that are
independent and equal. As such, they should proceed on the
basis of their legitimate equality, without fear of
retribution, in the best interest of humanity, and for a
better future for us all.
5:
I am honoured to be asked to
speak in this historic parliament of the people of Great
Britain . Like you I am aware that this Parliament prepared
the official political basis of the crimes that defined the
colonial past. It is here, in this House, that the evil
system of slavery, and genocide, were established. This
House passed laws, framed fiscal policies, and enforced the
crimes that have produced harmful legacies and persistent
suffering now in need of repair.
6:
This House also made emancipation from
slavery and independence from colonialism an empowering
reality. It is in here, we now imagine, that laws for
reparatory justice can be conceptualized and implemented. It
is in here, we believe, that the terrible wrongs of the past
can be corrected, and humanity finally and truthfully
liberated from the shame and guilt that have followed these
historical crimes.
7:
We must believe in the corrective
power of this Parliament to respond positively to this
present challenge, and in the process free itself from the
bondage of its own sins and crimes. Without this belief our
journey here this evening would be lacking integrity, and
without a doubt, would be a useless exercise.
8:
But I speak in this honourable House
this evening, not only as chairman of a rightfully
constituted commission that is peopled by some of our finest
Caribbean citizens, and who have been selected by our
distinguished Presidents and Prime Ministers, but as a
Caribbean person with an affinity for this country. I was
raised and educated here. I came from the Caribbean to this
country as a child; I grew to maturity here; and was
educated here in a fine university that has distinguished
itself in the Liberal-Progressive pedagogy of the
nation.
9:
Great Britain , therefore, is my second
home and I care for it as I care for my first home, the
Great Caribbean . I wish for Great Britain , as I do for the
Great Caribbean , peace and prosperity. I wish that their
shared past, painful though it has been, will be transformed
into a moral force of mutual respect and development
cooperation. It is for these reasons that I have joined
the Caribbean and global movement for reparatory justice. I
believe we can settle this case within the context of
diplomatic initiatives that are consistent with our status
as equal nations.
10:
The crimes committed against the
indigenous, African, and Asian peoples of the Caribbean are
well documented. We know of the 250 years of slave trading,
chattel slavery, and the following 100 years of colonial
oppression.
11:
Slavery was ended in 1838, only to be replaced by a century
of racial apartheid, including the denigration of Asian
people. Indigenous genocide, African chattel slavery and
genocide, and Asian contract slavery, were three acts of a
single play – a single process by which the British state
forcefully extracted wealth from the Caribbean resulting in
its persistent, endemic poverty.
12:
I wish to comment,
as a result, on the 1833 Act of Emancipation, and how this
august Parliament betrayed the enslaved people of the
Caribbean by forcing them to pay more than 50% of the cost
of their own emancipation. This is an aspect of the history
long hidden from public view. We know, for example, that
this Parliament in 1833 determined that the 800,000 enslaved
people in the Caribbean were worth, as chattel property,
£47 million. This was their assessed market
value. We know that this Parliament
determined that all slave owners should receive just and
fair compensation for the official taking away of their
property. We know that this Parliament provided the
sum of £20 million in grants to the slave owners as fair
compensation for the loss of their human chattel.
13:
And we know that this Parliament determined that the
enslaved people would receive none of this compensation. The
argument made in this House was that ‘property’ cannot
receive property compensation. This Parliament, in its
emancipation Act, upheld the law that black people were not
human, but property.
14:
What this Parliament has hid from the
world is that it also determined that the remaining £27
million would be paid by the enslaved people to their
enslavers, by means of a 4 year period of free labour called
the Apprenticeship.
15:
This period of additional free labour by the emancipated
represented the enforced extraction of £27 million by the
state. It was a cruel and shameful method of legislating
Emancipation by forcing the enslaved to pay more than 50% of
the financial cost of their own freedom. The £20 million
paid the enslavers by this Parliament was less than the £27
million paid by the enslaved to the enslavers as dictated by
this House.
Comment