Re: No guns for you!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: monk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Guns are not manufactured commercially in Jamaica but firearms are being made in Jamaica. </div></div>
since we're looking at exact words, why don't you look where I said exactly that. however from this exchange it seems clear you like to cherry pick, in which case I would say I am having a conversation not submitting a thesis and would expect the courtesy of recognizing that. You still aren't getting the relatively moot point, which is ironic when you say it is moot but argue it anyway. At least I hope you see where your salmonella argument fails, and if you do then you should be able to recognize why you really aren't addressing the logic of my argument at all. Now you just need to apply that to a lot of other things you feel you are poking holes in. I don't know if this has to do with a purposeful desire to be obtuse so you have something to argue about with yourself or if you are just ignorant about law enforcement and how guns can be traced. "I have no proof" vs "not posting proof" are two different things as you seem to be fond of pointing out. I preferred not to get anecdotal and so went with the obvious 2 points which can be observed by any mouthbreather looking at the problem. 1. ALL ILLEGAL GUNS BEGIN THEIR LIFE AS LEGAL firearms. 2. GUNS CAN BE TRACED. So right there it is obvious there is a breakdown somewhere between legal and illegal weapons. If that were fixed, then there would be less guns available and less people resorting to gun violence. I feel that is a far better solution, if a part of an overall solution, than just making it easy for any tom dick or harry to get a gun. Guns are already easy to get, whether legal or illegal what difference does a turn of phrase mean. So to foam on about making legal guns easy to get makes no sense. If you really need one, get one. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6 is I believe the NRA bumper sticker for that premise. Some people can't even drive, so why we want them to have power of life or death is beyond me.
These two basic points can not be argued, unless you wish to be woefully ignorant. So guns manufactured in the US need tighter controls and should not be so easy to export to other countries. When the US gets uppity they burn fields of poppy or coca, because these are processed and exported to US shores and it is considered a problem. They burn ganja, for basically the same reason.
So the fact that US manufactured guns make it into Jamaica by whatever circuitous route represents a traceable problem for which there are or should be implementable solutions. And in fact the routes are traced quite a bit and I'm surprised you are ignorant of them as to me they seem obvious. In any case, it's safe to say, conversationally, that many guns in Jamaica get their start in the US.
my logic is sound and obvious. less illegal guns on the street = less gun murders and more friends who would be alive today. in fact that can be said including LEGAL guns as well, because just because you have one doesn't mean you get a chance to draw it and I know a few people who bore weapons but never got the chance to defend themselves, which is why I also posted about the 21' rule amongst LEOs which some forces have upgraded to 30' in response to Mr. Smith's observation that he didn't think a cutlass could stand against a gun.
</div></div>
...and idiot as I said before your arguments are baseless and without an ounce of sense you still cannot definitively say that a gun manufactured in the USA and end up on the streets of Jamaica is necessarily a gun imported from the USA. You are writing a bag of cow manure while still mixing up the issues of gun manufacture and gun importation in Jamaica.
Further more you seem overly fixated on the USA as if you know for sure that the any of, all of or most of the guns in Jamaica were manufactured in the USA. Fool if you are privy to that info spill it because I don't know and I am pretty sure others would like to get the knowledge as well.
Oh and idiot you are claiming not to be defending a thesis yet you proceed to lecture me on what? Next time before you commit your screed to the board try use spell-check.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: monk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Guns are not manufactured commercially in Jamaica but firearms are being made in Jamaica. </div></div>
since we're looking at exact words, why don't you look where I said exactly that. however from this exchange it seems clear you like to cherry pick, in which case I would say I am having a conversation not submitting a thesis and would expect the courtesy of recognizing that. You still aren't getting the relatively moot point, which is ironic when you say it is moot but argue it anyway. At least I hope you see where your salmonella argument fails, and if you do then you should be able to recognize why you really aren't addressing the logic of my argument at all. Now you just need to apply that to a lot of other things you feel you are poking holes in. I don't know if this has to do with a purposeful desire to be obtuse so you have something to argue about with yourself or if you are just ignorant about law enforcement and how guns can be traced. "I have no proof" vs "not posting proof" are two different things as you seem to be fond of pointing out. I preferred not to get anecdotal and so went with the obvious 2 points which can be observed by any mouthbreather looking at the problem. 1. ALL ILLEGAL GUNS BEGIN THEIR LIFE AS LEGAL firearms. 2. GUNS CAN BE TRACED. So right there it is obvious there is a breakdown somewhere between legal and illegal weapons. If that were fixed, then there would be less guns available and less people resorting to gun violence. I feel that is a far better solution, if a part of an overall solution, than just making it easy for any tom dick or harry to get a gun. Guns are already easy to get, whether legal or illegal what difference does a turn of phrase mean. So to foam on about making legal guns easy to get makes no sense. If you really need one, get one. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6 is I believe the NRA bumper sticker for that premise. Some people can't even drive, so why we want them to have power of life or death is beyond me.
These two basic points can not be argued, unless you wish to be woefully ignorant. So guns manufactured in the US need tighter controls and should not be so easy to export to other countries. When the US gets uppity they burn fields of poppy or coca, because these are processed and exported to US shores and it is considered a problem. They burn ganja, for basically the same reason.
So the fact that US manufactured guns make it into Jamaica by whatever circuitous route represents a traceable problem for which there are or should be implementable solutions. And in fact the routes are traced quite a bit and I'm surprised you are ignorant of them as to me they seem obvious. In any case, it's safe to say, conversationally, that many guns in Jamaica get their start in the US.
my logic is sound and obvious. less illegal guns on the street = less gun murders and more friends who would be alive today. in fact that can be said including LEGAL guns as well, because just because you have one doesn't mean you get a chance to draw it and I know a few people who bore weapons but never got the chance to defend themselves, which is why I also posted about the 21' rule amongst LEOs which some forces have upgraded to 30' in response to Mr. Smith's observation that he didn't think a cutlass could stand against a gun.
</div></div>
...and idiot as I said before your arguments are baseless and without an ounce of sense you still cannot definitively say that a gun manufactured in the USA and end up on the streets of Jamaica is necessarily a gun imported from the USA. You are writing a bag of cow manure while still mixing up the issues of gun manufacture and gun importation in Jamaica.
Further more you seem overly fixated on the USA as if you know for sure that the any of, all of or most of the guns in Jamaica were manufactured in the USA. Fool if you are privy to that info spill it because I don't know and I am pretty sure others would like to get the knowledge as well.
Oh and idiot you are claiming not to be defending a thesis yet you proceed to lecture me on what? Next time before you commit your screed to the board try use spell-check.
Comment