A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**britisha** · 07-04-2009, 07:29 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Panajar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> "Men in general judge things by appearances and the few who perceive the truth will be overwhelmed by the many who do not.The people being slaves to customs cannot, stand change".
QUOTE taken from <span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince </span> . nuff said. </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince</span> was written by a <span style="font-weight: bold">WHITE MAN. Machiavelli...</span>

How dare you quote a white man in dealing with <span style="font-weight: bold">black</span> "subjects" err topics?

**britisha** · 07-04-2009, 07:40 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[quote]how has the queen helped

I'm a sure a village somewhere is missing its idiot. </div></div>I think there are probably many villages that are completely full of idiots.
They bad thing is that,They have been educated and socialized to be such, without eve knowing it. </div></div>

You damn fool, do you stop to read the drivel you crabtoe here?

Idiocy cannot be taught, nor learned from socialization, it is<span style="font-weight: bold"> a mental state that comes naturally as in your case...</span>

..for example fool, if something is "full" it is full...no need to talk about "completely" full...idiot...

bout yuh a drap words pan people, when those words aptly apply tuh yuh...

**britisha** · 07-04-2009, 08:18 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Such ungrateful behavior is a disgrace to their progeny. I mean what were they thinking? Ooh they probably lack the ability to think. Since their 'kind' use instinct instead of cognitive analysis. </div></div>

You sound like the criminologists who think that black people are born criminals because of their "race."

Still yet, you would have the cotton picking nerve to COGNITISE that anyone here should take you seriously or even pay attention to ANYTHING that you post.. when you make volatile comments like these..

Any hoo, yooo hooo...explain to the board what is "cognitive analysis" you fool. I challenge you, let's hear it!!

Warning: do not trip yourself now, the floor is yours...Now..as I was saying...

Why would or should Jamaicans use "cognitive" analysis, and under what circumstances ?

You are borrowing or rather plagiarising from "psychotherapy" and applying a "catch phrase' to an area which doesn't bear any relevance to the discussion, just to show how nasty and condescending you are, and satisfy your sick over inflated ego. !!..

You are a JOKER and a classic case of <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-size: 11pt">"A LITTLE LEARNING IS A DANGEROUS THING"</span></span>

For the benefit of those who don't see where this <span style="font-weight: bold">cretin</span> is attempting to go with this...[you said we use "instinct" so tit for tat...now don't run and go to Mama or blow any whistle]

..in trying to make us look stupid and intellectually inferior, you bit off more than you can chew and in essence, you only made an arse of yourself...and many would file your posts you make here under "sad and pathetic." Really should be NO laughing matter here, for it is truly embarrassing to say the least.

One secan:

<span style="font-style: italic">HIFF A LAFF A DED, *I* REST MY CASE</span>

This is what I mean when I say some a oono run aawn yaah and a drap big words and phrases, an tink seh ppl foo foo an noh si di <span style="font-weight: bold">ignorance</span> and pomp behine oono idiocy and lunacy....and embarrass di Jamaican education system by posting pere faawt.

<span style="font-style: italic">
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona

Version 1.0. October 25, 2000

Introduction

There is no such thing as "cognitive analysis". Or is there?

We have discourse analysis, and its many branches (stylistics, rhetoric, narrative or argumentation analysis, as well as syntactic, semantic or pragmatic analysis, and of course conversation analysis), but<span style="font-weight: bold"> "cognitive analysis" is not a well-known, standard way of looking at text or talk.</span>

We have a cognitive psychology of discourse processing (production, comprehension), and we have a social psychology of discourse (the Loughborough school) called "discursive psychology", but the latter rejects any mental approach and in fact advocates a more ethnomethodological approach to discourse within social psychology.<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-size: 14pt">

So, if we speak about "cognitive analysis" , it is something we have to invent ourselves. And we must show why it is relevant for our understanding of discourse.</span></span>

The argument behind such an attempt is that text and talk do not exist in isolation. Most obviously, discourse analysis since many years emphasizes the relevance of the study of context for our understanding of many aspects of discourse.

Relevant in such contexts are the social domain (e.g., Education, Politics), the global act partially accomplished by text or talk (e.g., legislation, teaching, etc), the participants and their various communicative, social and professional roles, the relations between participants (such as that of power), the setting (time, location) and maybe some other social or interactional properties of communicative event.

Part of the context, however, are also some of the 'cognitive' properties of the participants, such as their aims, beliefs, knowledge and opinions. Without taking into account, we cannot understand why people are speaking or writing at all, or how they show adapt what they say or write to the knowledge or other beliefs of the recipients.<span style="font-weight: bold">

In other words, not only because of a 'mentalist' aim to understand the processes of actual discourse comprehension or production, but also for important contextual reasons, a study of the cognitive aspects of communication is highly relevant.

In this introductory working note, we provide an outline of how to do a 'cognitive' analysis of discourse.</span>

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

READ ON: see how this relates to the discussion at hand.

A Cognitive Analysis of Solutions for Verbal, Informal, and Formal-Deductive Reasoning Problems
Author(s):

Enright, Mary K.
Tucker, Carol B.
Katz, Irvin R.
Publication Year:

1995
Report Number:

RR-95-06
Supplemental Report Number(s):

GREB-90-04P
Abstract:

A previous study of new item types for the analytical measure of the GRE General Test found that the items loaded on three of four separable factors were labeled verbal reasoning, informal reasoning, formal-deductive reasoning, and quantitative reasoning. The present study examined the issue of how processing differed for these item types in the context of a problem-space framework. Protocols of examinees solving a small set of problems aloud were collected. These protocols were examined with respect to two phases of the problem- solving process: problem representation and problem solution. For formal-deductive items, all the information necessary to solve the problem was provided in the problem statement. The representation of formal-deductive items involved the use of meaning- reduced tokens and spatial diagrams. The units involved in the representation of informal reasoning and verbal reasoning item types included meaningful propositions and meaning-emphasizing paraphrases. Reference to common background knowledge occurred. The analysis of the problem-solution phase focused on the processes of evaluation (judgments of the correctness of an option) and justification (statements of an argument or of evidence for why an option was or was not correct). First, the order of these processes was found to differ for formal-deductive items and other item types. Secondly, item solutions varied in terms of the kinds of justifications that were offered by the examinees for accepting or rejecting options. These results illustrate how the addition of some item types to the GRE analytical measure will expand the variety of reasoning skills assessed. Implications of these results for cognitive models of reasoning are also discusse.

HIFF A LAFF A DED, *I* REST MY CASE...in trying to make us look stupid, you only made an arse of yourself.</span> I repeat !!

Sorrie, quacko, I just couldn't help it...gwaan goh ress yuhself, your game is up!!!

**britisha** · 07-04-2009, 08:46 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Beg oono read "should be NO laughing matter, sad and pathetic" uppah top. tenks

one link.

**Amberal37** · 07-04-2009, 09:22 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[quote]how has the queen helped

I'm a sure a village somewhere is missing its idiot. </div></div>I think there are probably many villages that are completely full of idiots.
They bad thing is that,They have been educated and socialized to be such, without eve knowing it. </div></div>

You damn fool, do you stop to read the drivel you crabtoe here?

Idiocy cannot be taught, nor learned from socialization, it is<span style="font-weight: bold"> a mental state that comes naturally as in your case...</span>

..for example fool, if something is "full" it is full...no need to talk about "completely" full...idiot...

bout yuh a drap words pan people, when those words aptly apply tuh yuh...

</div></div>

Dear Britisha,
Whoever you are, I do think that you are slightly deranged.

I think that your language is aggressive, confrontational, and you lack depth in your thought processes.
Why do you find it satisfactory to continually be attacking an individual on a board that promotes debate?
It is obvious that you do not agree with the opinion of the contributor Dr.Dudd, but your infantile tyrades give little indication that you are capable of "better" contribution -(whether judged to intelligent, fair, or factual).

I implore you to meditate on ways of dealing with the level of anger that you demonstrate.

**britisha** · 07-04-2009, 10:09 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: amberal37</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[quote=Humano]<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">how has the queen helped

I'm a sure a village somewhere is missing its idiot. </div></div>I think there are probably many villages that are completely full of idiots.
They bad thing is that,They have been educated and socialized to be such, without eve knowing it. </div></div>

You damn fool, do you stop to read the drivel you crabtoe here?

Idiocy cannot be taught, nor learned from socialization, it is<span style="font-weight: bold"> a mental state that comes naturally as in your case...</span>

..for example fool, if something is "full" it is full...no need to talk about "completely" full...idiot...

bout yuh a drap words pan people, when those words aptly apply tuh yuh...

</div></div>

Dear Britisha,
Whoever you are, I do think that you are slightly deranged.

I think that your language is aggressive, confrontational, and you lack depth in your thought processes.
Why do you find it satisfactory to continually be attacking an individual on a board that promotes debate?
It is obvious that you do not agree with the opinion of the contributor Dr.Dudd, but your infantile tyrades give little indication that you are capable of "better" contribution -(whether judged to intelligent, fair, or factual).

I implore you to meditate on ways of dealing with the level of anger that you demonstrate.
</div></div>

I was waiting for your type to come along, but I am well pleased that you take note of my post...<span style="font-weight: bold">ISN'T IT IRONIC THAT THE SAME THING THAT YOU ACCUSE "BRITISHA" OF IS THE VERY SAME THING THAT YOU ARE DOING?</span>

What if I should really respond to your <span style="font-weight: bold">ad hominems</span>?

If I were really confrontational, as you say, I cuddah really answer yuh...but as I always say, <span style="font-weight: bold">I will consider the source</span>...I am not that familiar with your board persona, in fact I haven't noticed you before, you have been so insignificant.

What you need to do now, is to go and read all those threads where the quackly doctor has taken potshots at "britisha," where the quackly doctor has insulted an entire board with his condescending and even racist remarks..

You aren't that honest to notice that now have yuh?

Now, frankly speaking I care not what your opinion is, pro or con...

If you want to come off as something that should be noticed, given any attention, then *I* recommend that you should chastise the "quackly doctor" for referring to board members and JAMAICANS as using "instinct" [meaning that they are LOWER animals] and such offensive terms. Also tell him to refrain from suggesting that we use "COGNITIVE" whateva. the honesty might absolve you..aldoa I won't hold my breath, considering your *attack*

Also tell him, not to chubble what doesn't chubble him.

Now that you have garnered a little attention I have no more time to waste on you...

**Dyoll_73** · 07-04-2009, 02:28 PM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">MoreFlatulence</span> was going to hell I would be forced to put in a good word for the devil. </div></div>

**Dyoll_73** · 07-04-2009, 02:31 PM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Panajar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> "Men in general judge things by appearances and the few who perceive the truth will be overwhelmed by the many who do not.The people being slaves to customs cannot, stand change".
QUOTE taken from <span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince </span> . nuff said. </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince</span> was written by a <span style="font-weight: bold">WHITE MAN. Machiavelli...</span>

How dare you quote a white man in dealing with <span style="font-weight: bold">black</span> "subjects" err topics? </div></div>

Nah man! Is just selective application of white man's 'wisdom'.

I hope he knows for whom Machiavelli wrote the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">Prince</span></span>, and why.

**Nylah** · 07-04-2009, 03:15 PM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Panajar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> "Men in general judge things by appearances and the few who perceive the truth will be overwhelmed by the many who do not.The people being slaves to customs cannot, stand change".
QUOTE taken from <span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince </span> . nuff said. </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince</span> was written by a <span style="font-weight: bold">WHITE MAN. Machiavelli...</span>

How dare you quote a white man in dealing with <span style="font-weight: bold">black</span> "subjects" err topics? </div></div>

Nah man! Is just selective application of white man's 'wisdom'.

I hope he knows for whom Machiavelli wrote the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">Prince</span></span>, and why. </div></div>

thank you

bears repeating

bout Prince

yes we are all so illerate and "fooled" by the white man that noone around here has read the same book and understand that it has no application to this here argument

**britisha** · 07-04-2009, 03:24 PM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Panajar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> "Men in general judge things by appearances and the few who perceive the truth will be overwhelmed by the many who do not.The people being slaves to customs cannot, stand change".
QUOTE taken from <span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince </span> . nuff said. </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince</span> was written by a <span style="font-weight: bold">WHITE MAN. Machiavelli...</span>

How dare you quote a white man in dealing with <span style="font-weight: bold">black</span> "subjects" err topics? </div></div>

Nah man! Is just selective application of white man's 'wisdom'.

I hope he knows for whom Machiavelli wrote the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">Prince</span></span>, and why. </div></div>

Yuh cuddah fool mi Humano, around here, some a dem hate "white people" so it only stands to reason that they should also "hate" their words...no chroo?

It either "is" or "isn't"..

**Tuff Gong** · 07-06-2009, 09:23 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wahalla</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I have no problem with president but it would be more poltical than it is currently. A non poltical head of state is a nesscity with more power than it currently has.... Japan can afford playing with its head of state role... we waste enough money....it aint broke... why spend to fix it ????? </div></div>

Consider this spat it ties together a number of issues that despite the <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">insipid row</span> here got discussed at length.

<a href="http://www.radiojamaica.com/content/view/19475/88/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">British CCJ judge</span> chided for political comments
Fri<span style="font-style: italic">day, 03 July 2009</span></a>

<span style="color: #660000">A British judge who sits on the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) is said to be in danger of losing his position over comments he has made on political and constitutional matters in Trinidad and Tobago.

Already the President of the CCJ and the country's law association have said that the judge stepped out of line in his remarks.

<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Justice David Hayton made the offending comments in a newspaper interview. He told the reporter that in his opinion the office of the Prime Minister already held too much power.

In this regard he said there should be no sort of creating an executive president who will have even more power from the present Prime Minister.

The judge was also highly critical of Opposition Leader Basdeo Panday for the latter's refusal to support the Caribbean Court of Justice.</span>

Opposition support is needed for Trinidad to replace the British Privy Council with the CCJ.

Two days after the comments were made; President of the CCJ Michael de la Bastide took out a full advertisement in the local newspapers to chide the judge.

He said the judge had<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"> no right </span>to be commenting on political and constitutional issues.</span>

**jah_yout** · 07-06-2009, 10:36 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nylah</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah_yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Panajar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince </span> </div></div>

i read that book...by machiavelli...i remember tupac's last album he did when alive his alias was makavelli </div></div>

and I read the book when I was 13 years old...what is the relevance to your point in any of this?

And as much as I love Tupuc and think he is a wikkid poet, how he choose to live <span style="font-weight: bold">and die</span>, is not what I would hold up as a shining example of a strong black man... </div></div>

lol...easy nuh;
the man posted a quote from 'the prince' by machiavelli and i wrote that i read that book; i also remembered that the late rapper tupac used the name 'makavelli' as an alias on his last album recorded in his lifetime;
so my post was not really relevant to the topic nor did it have a deeper hidden meaning- you can say it was just an aside ...

**jah_yout** · 07-06-2009, 10:44 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nylah</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Originally posted by Panajar

"Men in general judge things by appearances and the few who perceive the truth will be overwhelmed by the many who do not.The people being slaves to customs cannot, stand change".
QUOTE taken from <span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince </span> . nuff said. </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold">The Prince</span> was written by a <span style="font-weight: bold">WHITE MAN. Machiavelli...</span>

How dare you quote a white man in dealing with <span style="font-weight: bold">black</span> "subjects" err topics? </div></div>

Nah man! Is just selective application of white man's 'wisdom'.

I hope he knows for whom Machiavelli wrote the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">Prince</span></span>, and why. </div></div>

thank you

bears repeating

bout Prince

yes we are all so illerate and "fooled" by the white man that noone around here has read the same book and understand that it has no application to this here argument

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

it's kind of silly to attack a quote because of who wrote it...it is the message that the words convey that are relevant, not the race/color/weight/height of the person who wrote/said it...

if anything disect the quote and debunk its argument/point on its own merit instead of attacking the person who created the quote or the one who posted it

**jah_yout** · 07-06-2009, 10:52 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah_yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: More4us</div><div class="ubbcode-body">1: Research the history of the house of Windsor

</div></div>
Royal family & Hanover
In 1714, George I, a German-speaking Hanoverian prince of mixed British and German descent, ascended to the British throne, founding the House of Hanover. For over a century, Britain's monarchs were also rulers of Hanover (first as an Electorate of the Holy Roman Empire, then as a separate Kingdom). This was a personal union rather than a political one, with the two countries remaining quite separate. Hanover was occupied during the Napoleonic wars, but some Hanoverian troops fled to the United Kingdom to form the King's German Legion, a unit within the British army made up of ethnic Germans. The link between the two kingdoms finally ended in 1837 with the accession of Queen Victoria to the British throne (as women could not inherit the throne of Hanover).

<span style="font-weight: bold">Every British monarch from George I to Edward VII in the twentieth century, took a Royal German spouse. This led to close blood ties between British and German royalty. The British Royal family retained a German surname until 1917, when, in response to the anti-German feelings of World War I, it was legally changed to the English-sounding 'Windsor'</span>. British Royal family members gave up any German titles they held in the same year, whilst their German relatives were stripped of any British titles they held by an Act of Parliament.

Germany–United Kingdom relations - Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-German_relations

</div></div>

How does this <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">prove</span> the Queen's links to Hitler?
How does this <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">prove</span> that the Queen of England supported the Third Reich?
</div></div>

that is a discussion you will have to take up with more4us, as i have no idea what if any links between the british royals and hitler...i was merely posting something on the history of the house of windsor...
i never made any reference to hitler at any time in this thread;
my argument has not changed- my stance is that it is somewhat ridiculous for the official head of state of jamaica to be the british queen- queen of an empire which was jamaica's former enslaver & colonizer & guilty of many atrocities against its people;
that has been and remains my opinion...

**jah_yout** · 07-06-2009, 10:57 AM

Re: A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: neutral</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I do feel that it would be in jamaica`s interest to cling on to it`s former masters coat tails for some time yet,..because in my opinion jamaica is just not ready yet. </div></div>

i'm sure there are probably a lot of people who would sign up right now to become a colony again...

A wen Jamaica a go get rid a this foolishness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

ads