Tweet
do you think it's ethical for cnn (other news agencies) to play the 911 calls of distressed people who may be on the brink of death?
-
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
i think it is unethical for the 911 people to release the callsWhen its hot in the jungle of peace I go swimming in the ocean of love..... -
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
good call.
question: are they available through any <span style="font-style: italic">freedom of information act </span>thingy? anyone know?Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
i know I wouldnt want to hear publicly my family members making those distressed calls, but i do hope they would give the family a copy of those calls,
Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SistaCtry</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i know I wouldnt want to hear publicly my family members making those distressed calls, but i do hope they would give the family a copy of those calls, </div></div>
me either.Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
You could probably get a redacted copy under FOIA.. like the ones that the smoking gun uses...
FOIA allows you to get most things that are paid for with/by TaxPayer money... The point would be after they redact the document, normally there is nothing left and what left does not make sense...
IMOComment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">do you think it's ethical for cnn (other news agencies) to play the 911 calls of distressed people who may be on the brink of death? </div></div>
Those calls did not happen. They're as fake as Bin Laden tapes.
<span style="font-style: italic">American Airlines and Qualcomm, proudly announced the development of a new wireless technology --which will at some future date allow airline passengers using their cell phones to contact family and friends from a commercial aircraft.
<span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">Travelers could be talking on their personal cellphones as early as 2006. </span></span>Earlier this month [July 2004], American Airlines conducted a trial run on a modified aircraft that permitted cell phone calls." (WP, July 27, 2004)</span>
According to <span style="font-weight: bold">experts</span>, it was impossible in 2001, to place a mobile call from an aircraft traveling at high speed above 8,000 feet. You are being lied to.Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
I agree with RichieComment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
<span style="font-weight: bold">OFFICIAL TAPE:
(Sound natural? Using your last name when talking to your mother?)</span>
Caller: "Mom? This is Mark Brigham."
Caller: "I want you to know that I love you. I'm on a flight from Newark to San Francisco and there are three guys who have taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb."
Lady: "Who are these guys?
Caller: (after a pause) "You believe me, don't you?
Caller: "Yes, Mark. I believe you. But who are these guys?
<span style="font-weight: bold">Wouldn't you or I say something like, "Mum, this is Mark." Or "Mum, it's me, Mark." (Given the fact that your mother might, just might know your surname. Sounds like a badly thought through Hollywood script to me. Just like the CIA/Pentagon-sponsored film, United 93.</span>
When you can see actors and actresses portraying the alleged hijackers and other passengers on United Airlines Flight 93, but cannot view any surveillance videotape from any of the "Category X" high security international airports from which the flights of 9/11 departed, one can only conclude that there is something seriously odd.Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
ahm Derek, when i get to work i'll see if i can google the call from Ray Carruth's girlfriend after he shot her in her moving car.
Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ahm Derek, when i get to work i'll see if i can google the call from Ray Carruth's girlfriend after he shot her in her moving car. </div></div>
I don't see the connection...
I'd prefer if you gave me a logical explanation as to how 19 guys boarded four planes without being picked up on camera outside the airports, inside the airports, climbing perimeter fences, at check-in, while boarding, etc, at airports that are under heavy visual surveillance at all times.
Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
you said 911 calls are fake.
in the case you're talking about where the guy says his last name to his mother. he could have been nervous. maybe those 19 guys pretended to be passengers with bombs?Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">you said 911 calls are fake.
in the case you're talking about where the guy says his last name to his mother. he could have been nervous. maybe those 19 guys pretended to be passengers with bombs? </div></div>
Ah, maybe....
Well of course they must have pretended to be passengers. With bombs.
But how did ALL 19 NOT be picked up on CCTV, to be shown on Fox and shut me up?Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
And that Mohammed Atta guy, the so-called mastermind
(Didn't it used to be Osama Bin Laden?)
According to his white, Christian American girlfriend Amanda Keller, whom he lived with in Florida:
Atta liked to stuff a load of coke up his nose, drank heavily, wore plenty of bling, partied all night and was partial to pork chops. She thought he was involved with the Mafia. He was actually an FBI informant.
Atta sounds like a pretty regular kind of guy to me eh? Hardly the behaviour of an Islamic extremist.
And her description of him is more believable to me than his passport being found amid the burning rubble of WTC.Comment
-
Re: cnn and 911 distress calls
this is a point that I do agree with Derek on....how they were able to call from their cell phones on the plane.
I mean I have tried doing it when I shouldnt have and could never get a signal that high up
it would always confuse me that I couldnt do it years later but they were able to do so in 2001. Unless they had those on flight phones to use??
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">do you think it's ethical for cnn (other news agencies) to play the 911 calls of distressed people who may be on the brink of death? </div></div>
Those calls did not happen. They're as fake as Bin Laden tapes.
<span style="font-style: italic">American Airlines and Qualcomm, proudly announced the development of a new wireless technology --which will at some future date allow airline passengers using their cell phones to contact family and friends from a commercial aircraft.
<span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">Travelers could be talking on their personal cellphones as early as 2006. </span></span>Earlier this month [July 2004], American Airlines conducted a trial run on a modified aircraft that permitted cell phone calls." (WP, July 27, 2004)</span>
According to <span style="font-weight: bold">experts</span>, it was impossible in 2001, to place a mobile call from an aircraft traveling at high speed above 8,000 feet. You are being lied to. </div></div>Comment
Comment