Population Reduction for a Global Nation

[halfwaytree]

Re: Population Reduction for a Global Nation

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Curmudgeon_Milo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

<span style="font-size: 26pt">THERE IS NO GOD </span></div></div>

I don't disagree with you, but how do you know that? </div></div>

Because there is no proof otherwise. </div></div>


Just as there is no proof to the contrary?

I guess what I am trying to say Derek is that if someone claims that something exists then they need to back it up with physical proof. The only proof that &quot;God&quot; exist is through peoples faith. Until physical evidence comes forth to prove God's existence then the logical conclusion is that God does not exist.

Hmmm...

But believers claim physical proof is in front of their very eyes.

Is having no faith proof non-existence?

As you are aware this debate is endless, but at the end of the day religion holds no more weight than a fairy tale. At least science has physically based theories as to how the universe was formed etc... .

Anyway, I'll let you have the last word on this as it is pointless to continue.

[Derek]

Re: Population Reduction for a Global Nation

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Curmudgeon_Milo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Curmudgeon_Milo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

<span style="font-size: 26pt">THERE IS NO GOD </span></div></div>

I don't disagree with you, but how do you know that? </div></div>

Because there is no proof otherwise. </div></div>


Just as there is no proof to the contrary?

I guess what I am trying to say Derek is that if someone claims that something exists then they need to back it up with physical proof. The only proof that &quot;God&quot; exist is through peoples faith. Until physical evidence comes forth to prove God's existence then the logical conclusion is that God does not exist.

Hmmm...

But believers claim physical proof is in front of their very eyes.

Is having no faith proof non-existence?

As you are aware this debate is endless, but at the end of the day religion holds no more weight than a fairy tale. At least science has physically based theories as to how the universe was formed etc... .

Anyway, I'll let you have the last word on this as it is pointless to continue.

This is not a discussion about religion!

Scientific physically-based theory - you used the word 'theory' not 'fact' - is not at odds with a universe created by Grand Design.

You're right, let's done the argument.

[Hugo]

Re: Population Reduction for a Global Nation

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">They have quietly positioned themselves to maintain control of the world's wealth from behind the scenes.

They manage the majority of the world's wealth like puppeteers. The are still in control. </span></span> </div></div>



They:

Vatican
Astor
Bundy
Collins
DuPont
European 'royalty'
Freeman
Krupps
Kennedy
Li
Onassis
Reynolds
Rockefeller
Rothschilds
Russell
Van Duyn



</div></div>

HochiMing

[Derek]

Re: Population Reduction for a Global Nation

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">They have quietly positioned themselves to maintain control of the world's wealth from behind the scenes.

They manage the majority of the world's wealth like puppeteers. The are still in control. </span></span> </div></div>



They:

Vatican
Astor
Bundy
Collins
DuPont
European 'royalty'
Freeman
Krupps
Kennedy
Li
Onassis
Reynolds
Rockefeller
Rothschilds
Russell
Van Duyn



</div></div>

Second-tier families:
Mellon
Carnegie
Duke
Dorrance
Stiliman
Baker
Pyne
Cuilman
Watson
Tuke
Kleinwort
Warburg
Phipps
Grace
Disney
Guggenheim
Milner
Drexel
Winthrop
Vanderbilt
Whitney
McDonald
Harkness