for Derek

[Suesumba]

<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZyKR2-A0KPU&amp;feature=fvw"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZyKR2-A0KPU&amp;feature=fvw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>

thought Derek would enjoy this

[Suesumba]

Re: for Derek

i agree. charlie sheen is a major enema bag.

[Derek]

Re: for Derek

So it's not just me then, Sue? (Sheen's an enema bag? Why attack the messenger rather than the message?)

WTC7: Larry Silverstein said, 'pull it', so it was pulled.

<span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">Do you know how many weeks of preparation it takes to set up explosives to 'pull' a building?</span></span> But that building was pulled on the same day - and how much did Silverstein collect on insurance?

[Derek]

Re: for Derek

<span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">Do you know how many weeks of preparation it takes to set up explosives to 'pull' a building?</span></span>

[Derek]

Re: for Derek

In February 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC7 was $386 million.

So: This building's collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million. The building was specifically insured against a terrorist attack.

After the attack, Silverstein Properties commenced litigation against its insurers, claiming it was entitled to twice the insurance policies' value because, according to a spokesman for Silverstein, &quot;the two hijacked airliners that struck the 110-story twin towers on Sept. 11 were separate 'occurrences' for insurance purposes, entitling him to collect twice on $3.6 billion of policies.&quot; This was reported on Bloomberg News less than one month after the attack.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Sue, was WTC7 already 'wired up' and ready to be 'pulled' within a few hours notice?</span>

[Suesumba]

Re: for Derek

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why attack the messenger rather than the message?</div></div>

i'm annoyed that it's so convenient for him to addresss these questions to BObama. Maybe they didn't have tapes when bush was the president. ah, the internet and the lack of nuances.

[kia027]

Re: for Derek

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Maybe they didn't have tapes when bush was the president. ah, the internet and the lack of nuances. </div></div>

If Gore was elected they would have back then

[Suesumba]

Re: for Derek

nah, i mean why did he do this tape when Obama is president? why not when Bush was president?

[Derek]

Re: for Derek

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SueSumba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">nah, i mean why did he do this tape when Obama is president? why not when Bush was president? </div></div>

Sheen is naive enough to think a Democratic government would be in a position to do something.

Democrat and Republican are just two sides of the same coin.