Tweet
Re: a soh american people tan?
Well tort reform may or may not benefit me. since i am a physician and also a potential patient.
And I may lose either way. So I don;t know who they are fooling.
As for the curbing of medicare, not one of them want to get any cut from the government run medicare.
As for the fraud, u don't know but the only area I see there is a significant savings is not from fraud.
It is from removing the conditions that forces physicians to prescribe expensive drugs even when there is no significant benefit to be derived based on experience.
simply because the PDR say it does not always make it right. <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: uglywhitedude</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So how does the opposition of health care for 45million lives square with all these life preservers?
Do they believe that they should be neglected?
do they think that their lives are not as important as the unborn ones? </div></div>
I don't think these people are necessarily "opposed" to insuring the uninsured so you're beginning with a false premise.
Perhaps they would argue that Tort reform, curbing medicare fraud, and opening up competition by letting people cross state lines to buy insurance would be <span style="font-weight: bold">some</span> of the ways to lower premiums. This is not opposition, rather, a different approach to reform... </div></div>
Well tort reform may or may not benefit me. since i am a physician and also a potential patient.
And I may lose either way. So I don;t know who they are fooling.
As for the curbing of medicare, not one of them want to get any cut from the government run medicare.
As for the fraud, u don't know but the only area I see there is a significant savings is not from fraud.
It is from removing the conditions that forces physicians to prescribe expensive drugs even when there is no significant benefit to be derived based on experience.
simply because the PDR say it does not always make it right. <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: uglywhitedude</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So how does the opposition of health care for 45million lives square with all these life preservers?
Do they believe that they should be neglected?
do they think that their lives are not as important as the unborn ones? </div></div>
I don't think these people are necessarily "opposed" to insuring the uninsured so you're beginning with a false premise.
Perhaps they would argue that Tort reform, curbing medicare fraud, and opening up competition by letting people cross state lines to buy insurance would be <span style="font-weight: bold">some</span> of the ways to lower premiums. This is not opposition, rather, a different approach to reform... </div></div>
Comment