Tweet
Re: lawd is wah do unno Americans????? racist image of 1st Lady
I can only say ot as i see it.
what can say??<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: amberal37</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Can see you're on mother Earth here
...<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The fraudulent result should have been corrected.
search engines are about results....
genuine results.....
this is obviously not a genuine result.
Google is either passing off it as a genuine search engine or a farce to be manipulated by whoever will.
A search engine's primary goal should be accuracy.
It is Not about indexing.
Indexing is only a method use to achieve accuracy.
if other means is nessary to support it,that is the responsibillity of the search engine owners use them to maintain accuracy inthe results..
If one is searching for Mrs Obama, and The picture of the President of russia comes up as the result.
Or if every search returned obviously erroneous result, the search engine would have lost it's ability to function as a search engine.
It should be obvious that that result is as erroneous the much as if it was a fraudulent site.
Fraud is fraud.
It does not matter if the site is genuinely owned by the fraudster,or if the site was stolen by the fraudster.
The result of presenting a fraudulent result is the same. there is no justification of a genuine search engine to refuse to correct a known fraudulent result it produces as genuine. <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BlackStar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Peace</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-style: italic">We like to make fun of our presidents. I've always thought Bush looks like a chimpanzee myself. Clearly I'm not the only one. </span> </div></div>Michelle Obama isn't the president. Besides <span style="font-weight: bold">comparing </span>someone to a monkey is different to <span style="font-weight: bold">portraying </span>them as a monkey.
In any case, as stated in one of the articles posted here, Google shouldn't have removed the image/site. Yes, it's offensive, but so is the Stormfront web site, the KKK, extremist religious organizations, and a whole bunch of other things on the "internets". </div></div> </div></div> </div></div>
I can only say ot as i see it.
what can say??<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: amberal37</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Can see you're on mother Earth here
...<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The fraudulent result should have been corrected.
search engines are about results....
genuine results.....
this is obviously not a genuine result.
Google is either passing off it as a genuine search engine or a farce to be manipulated by whoever will.
A search engine's primary goal should be accuracy.
It is Not about indexing.
Indexing is only a method use to achieve accuracy.
if other means is nessary to support it,that is the responsibillity of the search engine owners use them to maintain accuracy inthe results..
If one is searching for Mrs Obama, and The picture of the President of russia comes up as the result.
Or if every search returned obviously erroneous result, the search engine would have lost it's ability to function as a search engine.
It should be obvious that that result is as erroneous the much as if it was a fraudulent site.
Fraud is fraud.
It does not matter if the site is genuinely owned by the fraudster,or if the site was stolen by the fraudster.
The result of presenting a fraudulent result is the same. there is no justification of a genuine search engine to refuse to correct a known fraudulent result it produces as genuine. <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BlackStar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Peace</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-style: italic">We like to make fun of our presidents. I've always thought Bush looks like a chimpanzee myself. Clearly I'm not the only one. </span> </div></div>Michelle Obama isn't the president. Besides <span style="font-weight: bold">comparing </span>someone to a monkey is different to <span style="font-weight: bold">portraying </span>them as a monkey.
In any case, as stated in one of the articles posted here, Google shouldn't have removed the image/site. Yes, it's offensive, but so is the Stormfront web site, the KKK, extremist religious organizations, and a whole bunch of other things on the "internets". </div></div> </div></div> </div></div>
Comment