Should women who make false sex assault allegations & lie in court be charged?

[Tropicana]

In view of the Ghomeshi trial and the scathing remarks the judge made about the deception and lies told by the complainants, this topic is coming up for discussion.

What do you think?

Do you think the scum bucket should charge them for defamation of character?

[Emperah]

who is the scum bucket?

[Tropicana]

The women are liars but Ghomeshi is a scum bucket...total pond scum. Any man who is into kinky sex involving choking and other violence is a total low life.

[Tropicana]

After the Ghomeshi verdict: Could his accusers be charged? How will it affect future sex assault cases?

Former star CBC broadcaster Jian Ghomeshi was acquitted Thursday of all charges in a high-profile sexual assault trial.He faced five criminal charges from four events, involving three complainants after Ghomeshi was fired by the CBC and complaints of his sexual conduct were publicly raised.
The National Post looks at what impact the verdict might have.

Could the Crown pursue charges against any of the complainants?This is improbable. Not only would it enflame public animosity and counter the public interest in terms of encouraging victims to come forward, it would stand little chance of success.
The judge was critical of “deceptive and manipulative” evidence of the complainants.
“The judge did not say the events didn’t occur,” said Joseph Neuberger, a Toronto criminal lawyer. “The judge was critical of their reliability and credibility — but that is not sufficient to charge the complainants with public mischief or perjury,” he said.
It could be argued complainants breached an order of the court not to discuss testimony it would be unlikely the Crown would pursue charges, said LeVasseur. “The complainants have already suffered a lot; people made mistakes but it was not done for the purpose of misleading the court.”

Could Ghomeshi sue for defamation?He could try, however, this would require Ghomeshi to go on the offensive against female complainants and keep the accusations and headlines on this scandal rather than letting it settle as he seeks a way to emerge from it.
It would also allow his complainants another chance to make their case for the truthfulness of their claims in a civil court where, again, the burden of proof is lower, said Neuberger.
The best strategy for Ghomeshi after the trials are finished, said Schiffer, is to show humility and contriteness and then to “go dark and fade away” for perhaps a year. Suing the women who have wide support goes counter to that in a significant way. It would be a public relations nightmare.

Canada does not have double jeoprady laws so it is possible:

Will the Crown appeal the acquittals?
Crown attorney Michael Callaghan said he would consider the lengthy decision over the long weekend before making a decision on whether to pursue or discuss an appeal.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/after-the-ghomeshi-verdict-could-his-accusers-be-charged-how-will-it-affect-future-sex-assault-cases

[Tropicana]

[Tropicana]

[Tropicana]

Jamaican woman weighs in and gives advice to men. She talks about wicked beeoches and warns men.

[Tropicana]

So men, do you think men should sign consensual contracts with women so that beaoches don't lie and have them charged with rape 15 years later? What about hiding a micro-tape under the bed?