<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-style: italic">Roy Groenberg, a Dutchman of Surinamese descent who called himself “Chairman, Foundation to Honour and Restore payments to Victims of Slavery in Suriname”, wrote:
“We, descendants of enslaved in the former Dutch colony Suriname, want to let you know that we do not accept a book with the title The Book of Negroes. We struggle for a long time to let the word ‘[censored]’ disappear from the Dutch language and now you set up your Book of Negroes! A real shame! That’s why we make the decision to burn this book on the 22nd of June 2011. Maybe you do not know, but June is the month before the 1st of July, the day that we remember the abolition from the Dutch, who put our ancestors in slavery.</span>”</div></div>
thoughts?
For my part, at first I did think this book (based off the name) was presumptious.. I would see it in the store an would wonder "why this hombre think him can write a book which proports itself to represent an entire race of people.. must be a publicity stunt.. I refused to read it.
but having recently getting to meet the author briefly, and him explaining why he called the book "The Book Of Negroes" , I kinda see why he calls it that name. Its not (he says) presuming to speak for an entire race, instead he says its to bring attention to a british document called the book of negroes, that relates bto the initial Black people to be brought to north america.
In the States (and some other countries) this same book is called "Someone knowns My Name", as the publishers (rightfully) thought the title would alienate Black people... they were correct..
Comment