Following on from the 'Religious Nut' thread

[Derek]

Hasn't anyone noticed it's the same old FORMULA?

There seems to be a formula for virtually everything - repeating sequences and themes on the basis of: 'if it works why change it? If it aint broke, why fix it?'

Norway's another example of this and the classic formula: crazy gunman (immediately vilified by the media) and shots being fired simultaneously by professional killer(s) (according to witness, who will be largely ignored).

The complicity of the forces in the shadows is hidden by the 'lone gunmen' formula.

The definition of a 'conspiracy' is 'an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime' and so if you can pin the blame on a single person you hide the wider conspiracy right from the start - and literally by definition.

The same formula as per Siran Siran, James Earl Ray, Lee Harvey Oswald, Mark Chapman etc, etc.

The next thing will be the police or his lawyer 'confirms' that the guy is crazy.

[f0rTyLeGz]

Re: Following on from the 'Religious Nut' thread

Take a look at this depressing list of rampage killers... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ber_of_victims

Rampage murders have been going on for a long time... it's like serial killers, but they burn out fast and furiously. These rampage killers appear in many countries. Their insanity is not all that different form of madness a than the suicide bombers that Islamists are able to create out of young people by filling them up with insane reasoning. There are some amazing novels about what happens to these violent meltdown personalities...<span style="font-style: italic">The Temple of the Golden Pavillian</span>, and Truman Capote's <span style="font-style: italic">In Cold Blood</span> spring to mind.

[MsPeaches]

Re: Following on from the 'Religious Nut' thread


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
The complicity of the forces in the shadows is hidden by the 'lone gunmen' formula.

The definition of a 'conspiracy' is 'an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime' and so if you can pin the blame on a single person you hide the wider conspiracy right from the start - and literally by definition.

The same formula as per Siran Siran, James Earl Ray, Lee Harvey Oswald, Mark Chapman etc, etc.

The next thing will be the police or his lawyer 'confirms' that the guy is crazy.
</div></div>








Right on, Derek! - OR, in the case of a truly MONSTROUS conspiracy such as 9/11 is being more widely understood every day - a dozen 'outsiders' will do in a pinch.

But the thing they all have in common in Spades:

DIVERSIONARY TACTICS!!!!!!!!!

There's always a concerted effort to divert the attention of the Public from the really sinister and COWARDLY culprits behind these incidents. But the pattern is only too familiar by now.

[Derek]

Re: Following on from the 'Religious Nut' thread

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: f0rTyLeGz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Take a look at this depressing list of rampage killers... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ber_of_victims

Rampage murders have been going on for a long time... it's like serial killers, but they burn out fast and furiously. These rampage killers appear in many countries. Their insanity is not all that different form of madness a than the suicide bombers that Islamists are able to create out of young people by filling them up with insane reasoning. There are some amazing novels about what happens to these violent meltdown personalities...<span style="font-style: italic">The Temple of the Golden Pavillian</span>, and Truman Capote's <span style="font-style: italic">In Cold Blood</span> spring to mind. </div></div>

Forty, there were four Beatles.

Why didn't a crazy lone gunman go and shoot Ringo Starr, George Harrison or Paul McCartney?

No, the crazy lone gunman shoots the Beatle who was speaking out against the US government and making provocative songs and statements.

Why did a crazy lone gunman stop Robert Kennedy from becoming president?

Why did a crazy lone gunman hush the mouth of Martin Luther King?

Why did a crazy lone gunman shoot George Wallace and help Nixon into the White House?

Same old formula.

I'm not talking about random nut cases. I'm talking about convenient 'nut cases'.

This isn't an American thing, mind. The sleight of hand happens everywhere.