Tweet
Re: Obama boosting diversity of federal workforce
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lonrwolf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> itt like seyinn affirmative action iss a blakk ting even dough mzungu oomen ar de major beneficiaries aff affirmative action employment.
</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A good analysis of this statistic shows that the White man currently makes 98% of what he once made 30 years ago while the Black man now makes about 86% of what he used to make in the same time frame. Black women in the same comparison now make 175% while the White woman now makes 550% of what they used to make</div></div>.
Affirmative action is about quotas and preferences, that is what affirmative action amounts to in practice.
So, if that's the case, than by your own arguement, and staying with the original topic, white men are under represented in federal employment.
But in both public and private sector employment both black and white men are getting the short end. </div></div>
diss mekk mii laff
lonwolf att least mekk yu argument sound ann valid fe mekk diss disscussion intarestinn
furst mii see yu doan knoo da meaninn aff affirmative action, quotas ann preference dat y yu mixxinn dem awl upp ann gawn like dem a de same ting. affirmative action iss xxecutive order fe remedy institutional racism widdout regard to race dat dispropotionatelee benefit oyinbo men. quota iss mechanism dat republikkan trickee dickie pushed to paritallee remedy institutional racism. preference ar racial preference yu implieinn iss technikkallee iillegal cah affirmative action wass natt designed fe push racial preference cah affirmative action like da artikkle sed itt anti racial. yu a use positive definition fe describe negative ting iff yu reaallee ovatand da positive ann negative argument den yu will ovatand mii argument
so oyinbo man mekk less dat wat imm mekk 30 years ago wen oyinbo men ignore oww institutional racism gave oyinbo men preference dat y dem made more
wen yu sey oyinbo men ar underrepresented yu mekkinn a agruement based pon racial preference ann dat iss bout racial discrimination. wen yu sey blakk men ann oyinbo men ar gittinn da short end yu mekkinn a agrument fe racial ann sexual preferences butt afrimative action wass designed fe try fe eliminate racial ann sexual preferences. yu see dat de prablem widd reverse discrimination argument cah oyinbo ar usinn racial argument fe defend ann argue against racial discrimination
diss remind mii y mii use fe canfuse mii mzungu prof like watt mixxed race man diversitee order doinn. xxecutive order iss natt de issue itt da program dat oyinbo designed fe remedee racial discrimitation dat de issue
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lonrwolf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> itt like seyinn affirmative action iss a blakk ting even dough mzungu oomen ar de major beneficiaries aff affirmative action employment.
</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A good analysis of this statistic shows that the White man currently makes 98% of what he once made 30 years ago while the Black man now makes about 86% of what he used to make in the same time frame. Black women in the same comparison now make 175% while the White woman now makes 550% of what they used to make</div></div>.
Affirmative action is about quotas and preferences, that is what affirmative action amounts to in practice.
So, if that's the case, than by your own arguement, and staying with the original topic, white men are under represented in federal employment.
But in both public and private sector employment both black and white men are getting the short end. </div></div>
diss mekk mii laff
lonwolf att least mekk yu argument sound ann valid fe mekk diss disscussion intarestinn
furst mii see yu doan knoo da meaninn aff affirmative action, quotas ann preference dat y yu mixxinn dem awl upp ann gawn like dem a de same ting. affirmative action iss xxecutive order fe remedy institutional racism widdout regard to race dat dispropotionatelee benefit oyinbo men. quota iss mechanism dat republikkan trickee dickie pushed to paritallee remedy institutional racism. preference ar racial preference yu implieinn iss technikkallee iillegal cah affirmative action wass natt designed fe push racial preference cah affirmative action like da artikkle sed itt anti racial. yu a use positive definition fe describe negative ting iff yu reaallee ovatand da positive ann negative argument den yu will ovatand mii argument
so oyinbo man mekk less dat wat imm mekk 30 years ago wen oyinbo men ignore oww institutional racism gave oyinbo men preference dat y dem made more
wen yu sey oyinbo men ar underrepresented yu mekkinn a agruement based pon racial preference ann dat iss bout racial discrimination. wen yu sey blakk men ann oyinbo men ar gittinn da short end yu mekkinn a agrument fe racial ann sexual preferences butt afrimative action wass designed fe try fe eliminate racial ann sexual preferences. yu see dat de prablem widd reverse discrimination argument cah oyinbo ar usinn racial argument fe defend ann argue against racial discrimination
diss remind mii y mii use fe canfuse mii mzungu prof like watt mixxed race man diversitee order doinn. xxecutive order iss natt de issue itt da program dat oyinbo designed fe remedee racial discrimitation dat de issue
Comment