fiyah pon bruce

[RichD]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
manley didd mess upp too </div></div> what about PJ? </div></div>

juss soo yu knoo as yuths mii grandfaddar ann pj use too sit pon imm varandah ann argue politrixx. still yu knoo mii doan partial to pnp ar jlp

yess pj made sum mistakes too butt de badd ting iss dat imm ann portia didd a bettar jab dan bruce </div></div>



18 years of no growth..country nearly bankrupt..dollar gone from 5 to 1 to 85 to 1 .

yuh really not partial

[blugiant]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
imf ann wurld bank cum widd &quot;canditions&quot; dat wen fallawed neva improved de borrowers ann leave countrees furdar impoverished cah dem usuallee aff sell aff sum aff dem bettar assets. so fii sell guv paypah to yaawdees wild keepinn dem future revenue producinn assets wass preferable. mii luv wen awl dem victims aff de imf ann wurld bank bawl bout oww dem fallaw de imf ann wurld advice dem end upp poorer ann imf tell dem itt cah dem neva fallaw xxactlee wat dem tell dem fe do. richd iff de imf policies fail inn da past y go back to failed policies </div></div>


are the policies being employed the same as the 1970's/ 1980's? are the economic conditions the same?

you sounding like the GOP talkers fah true
</div></div>

cho richd yu awl de thyme mii pon yah ann yu neva figgar out mii canservative ann itt juss dat dem gop racist y mii doan support dem

even iff sum aff de policies ann canditions ar diffarant dem still usinn da same failed eeccaanyamikk theory. itt like peeps wey chatt bout capitalism ann communism ann doan realiesed dat arginated fram de same eecaanyamikk theory. doan ask mii fee xxplain eecaanyamikk histaree

[RichD]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
cho richd yu awl de thyme mii pon yah ann yu neva figgar out mii canservative ann itt juss dat dem gop racist y mii doan support dem

even iff sum aff de policies ann canditions ar diffarant dem still usinn da same failed eeccaanyamikk theory. itt like peeps wey chatt bout capitalism ann communism ann doan realiesed dat arginated fram de same eecaanyamikk theory. doan ask mii fee xxplain eecaanyamikk histaree </div></div>

what i'm getting at is those are just talking points and do no include any serious analysis of the issues or the measures being taken and the objectives.

since utopia hasn't been found yet it seems the policies you suggesting they be replaced with are the same failed policies also.

[blugiant]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
manley didd mess upp too </div></div> what about PJ? </div></div>

juss soo yu knoo as yuths mii grandfaddar ann pj use too sit pon imm varandah ann argue politrixx. still yu knoo mii doan partial to pnp ar jlp

yess pj made sum mistakes too butt de badd ting iss dat imm ann portia didd a bettar jab dan bruce </div></div>



18 years of no growth..country nearly bankrupt..dollar gone from 5 to 1 to 85 to 1 .

yuh really not partial </div></div>

da qwestian iss woo growth benefit? does itt benefit moas jamaicans? itt like peeps chattinn bout oww wii didd bettar undar oyinbo cantrol butt wen yu chatt too da olda peeps yu ear dem a chatt bout unemployment ann oww manee peeps neva ave nuttinn fe nyam.

look pon seaga undar busta imm push policies fe keep de value aff ja dollars iigh ann wen imm wass inn powa imm push policies fe devalue da dollars. ja misleaders ave a lang histaree aff devaluinn money ann pushinn inflation policies fe gitt growth.

dat wat mii mean bye mii natt partial cah mii studee da histaree ann lissen to olda peeps

beeleeve itt ar natt mii wass oopinn bruce wood doo a bettar jab fe jamaica

[RichD]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

da qwestian iss woo growth benefit? does itt benefit moas jamaicans? itt like peeps chattinn bout oww wii didd bettar undar oyinbo cantrol butt wen yu chatt too da olda peeps yu ear dem a chatt bout unemployment ann oww manee peeps neva ave nuttinn fe nyam.

look pon seaga undar busta imm push policies fe keep de value aff ja dollars iigh ann wen imm wass inn powa imm push policies fe devalue da dollars. ja misleaders ave a lang histaree aff devaluinn money ann pushinn inflation policies fe gitt growth.

dat wat mii mean bye mii natt partial cah mii studee da histaree ann lissen to olda peeps

beeleeve itt ar natt mii wass oopinn bruce wood doo a bettar jab fe jamaica </div></div>

so wid all the inflation in the last 18 years where is the growth?

[blugiant]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
cho richd yu awl de thyme mii pon yah ann yu neva figgar out mii canservative ann itt juss dat dem gop racist y mii doan support dem

even iff sum aff de policies ann canditions ar diffarant dem still usinn da same failed eeccaanyamikk theory. itt like peeps wey chatt bout capitalism ann communism ann doan realiesed dat arginated fram de same eecaanyamikk theory. doan ask mii fee xxplain eecaanyamikk histaree </div></div>

what i'm getting at is those are just talking points and do no include any serious analysis of the issues or the measures being taken and the objectives.

since utopia hasn't been found yet it seems the policies you suggesting they be replaced with are the same failed policies also. </div></div>

natt reallee talkinn pints. analysis aff de issues ann measure being taken ar more bout ideologee dan solutions. same coin juss two diffarant sides. peeps fail fe see dat pnp ann jlp agree pon eecaanyamikk issues dem juss dissagree oww too gitt deer wen de deeper qwestian iss weddar moas jamaicans agree.

[blugiant]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

da qwestian iss woo growth benefit? does itt benefit moas jamaicans? itt like peeps chattinn bout oww wii didd bettar undar oyinbo cantrol butt wen yu chatt too da olda peeps yu ear dem a chatt bout unemployment ann oww manee peeps neva ave nuttinn fe nyam.

look pon seaga undar busta imm push policies fe keep de value aff ja dollars iigh ann wen imm wass inn powa imm push policies fe devalue da dollars. ja misleaders ave a lang histaree aff devaluinn money ann pushinn inflation policies fe gitt growth.

dat wat mii mean bye mii natt partial cah mii studee da histaree ann lissen to olda peeps

beeleeve itt ar natt mii wass oopinn bruce wood doo a bettar jab fe jamaica </div></div>

so wid all the inflation in the last 18 years where is the growth? </div></div>

growth richer gittinn richer ann more peeps gittinn poorer dat y dem oocupyinn wallstreet

growth iss a funnee ting cah more growth doan mean lower unemployment ar less peeps livinn inn povertee ar increased tandards aff livinn. dat y eecaanyamists invented a new categoree cawled bakkward growth (no growth ar backward growth)

[RichD]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
growth richer gittinn richer ann more peeps gittinn poorer dat y dem oocupyinn wallstreet

growth iss a funnee ting cah more growth doan mean lower unemployment ar less peeps livinn inn povertee ar increased tandards aff livinn. dat y eecaanyamists invented a new categoree cawled bakkward growth (no growth ar backward growth) </div></div>

hold on there ..wern't you making an argument that the only reason they showed growth under seaga was the inflation gimmick ..so i'm asking why under the PNP with all the inflation that occurred were they not able to show any growth?

[RichD]

Re: fiyah pon bruce

when dem sey that government presided over the greatest transfer of wealth from poor to rich in the history of the country who yuh think dem talking about?