woo smearinn herman cain?

[blugiant]

tink pon diss da blakk sellout cain was runninn a very strong campaign ann sum poll tarted to show dat imm was startinn fe gain blakk support at de xxpense aff de mixxed race man. den awl aff a sudden allegation affs aff sexual harrassment against de blakk sellout tarted fe gain traction inn oyinbo media

woo oonnoo tink respansible fe smearinn da blakk sellout ann y?

[RichD]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">tink pon diss da blakk sellout cain was runninn a very strong campaign ann sum poll tarted to show dat imm was startinn fe gain blakk support at de xxpense aff de mixxed race man. den awl aff a sudden allegation affs aff sexual harrassment against de blakk sellout tarted fe gain traction inn oyinbo media

woo oonnoo tink respansible fe smearinn da blakk sellout ann y? </div></div>

the same ones who smiling wid him and embracing him are the ones smearing him

[blugiant]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">tink pon diss da blakk sellout cain was runninn a very strong campaign ann sum poll tarted to show dat imm was startinn fe gain blakk support at de xxpense aff de mixxed race man. den awl aff a sudden allegation affs aff sexual harrassment against de blakk sellout tarted fe gain traction inn oyinbo media

woo oonnoo tink respansible fe smearinn da blakk sellout ann y? </div></div>

the same ones who smiling wid him and embracing him are the ones smearing him </div></div>

natt sure cah iff yu xxamine diss dem oyinbo canservative peeps defendinn cain


even rush tat fe mekk funn aff one aff cain blonde accuser by call ar &quot;buy a lick&quot;

[blugiant]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

David Axelrod's Pattern of Sexual Misbehavior
by Ann Coulter


Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country -- Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. -- but never in Chicago.

So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.

Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).

The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator.

After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them -- by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)

And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago.

Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek.

Bialek's accusations were certainly specific. But they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless.

Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a &quot;gold-digger,&quot; that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's &quot;hired muscle.&quot;

Throw in some federal tax evasion, and she's Obama's next Cabinet pick.

The reason all this is relevant is that both Axelrod and Daley have a history of smearing political opponents by digging up claims of sexual misconduct against them.

John Brooks, Chicago's former fire commissioner, filed a lawsuit against Daley six months ago claiming Daley threatened to smear him with sexual harassment accusations if Brooks didn't resign. He resigned -- and the sexual harassment allegations were later found to be completely false.

Meanwhile, as extensively detailed in my book Guilty: Liberal 'Victims' and Their Assault on America, the only reason Obama became a U.S. senator -- allowing him to run for president -- is that David Axelrod pulled sealed divorce records out of a hat, first, against Obama's Democratic primary opponent, and then against Obama's Republican opponent.

One month before the 2004 Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate, Obama was way down in the polls, about to lose to Blair Hull, a multimillionaire securities trader.

But then The Chicago Tribune -- where Axelrod used to work -- began publishing claims that Hull's second ex-wife, Brenda Sexton, had sought an order of protection against him during their 1998 divorce proceedings.

From then until Election Day, Hull was embroiled in fighting the allegation that he was a &quot;wife beater.&quot; He and his ex-wife eventually agreed to release their sealed divorce records. His first ex-wife, daughters and nanny defended him at a press conference, swearing he was never violent. During a Democratic debate, Hull was forced to explain that his wife kicked him and he had merely kicked her back.

Hull's substantial lead just a month before the primary collapsed with the nonstop media attention to his divorce records. Obama sailed to the front of the pack and won the primary. Hull finished third with 10 percent of the vote.

Luckily for Axelrod, Obama's opponent in the general election had also been divorced.

The Republican nominee was Jack Ryan, a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard law and business schools, who had left his lucrative partnership at Goldman Sachs to teach at an inner-city school on the South Side of Chicago.

But in a child custody dispute some years earlier, Ryan's ex-wife, Hollywood sex kitten Jeri Lynn Ryan, had alleged that, while the couple was married, Jack had taken her to swingers clubs in Paris and New York.

Jack Ryan adamantly denied the allegations. In the interest of protecting their son, he also requested that the records be put permanently under seal.

Axelrod's courthouse moles obtained the &quot;sealed&quot; records and, in no time, they were in the hands of every political operative in Chicago. Knowing perfectly well what was in the records, Chicago Tribune attorneys flew to California and requested that the court officially &quot;unseal&quot; them -- over the objections of both Jack and Jeri Ryan.

Your honor, who knows what could be in these records!

A California judge ordered them unsealed, which allowed newspapers to publish the salacious allegations, and four days later, Ryan dropped out of the race under pressure from idiot Republicans (who should be tracked down and shot).

With a last-minute replacement of Alan Keyes as Obama's Republican opponent, Obama was able to set an all-time record in an Illinois Senate election, winning with a 43 percent margin.

And that's how Obama became a senator four years after losing a congressional race to Bobby Rush. (In a disastrous turn of events, Rush was not divorced.)

Axelrod destroyed the only two men who stood between Obama and the Senate with illicitly obtained, lurid allegations from their pasts.

In 2007, long after Obama was safely ensconced in the U.S. Senate, The New York Times reported: &quot;The Tribune reporter who wrote the original piece (on Hull's sealed divorce records) later acknowledged in print that the Obama camp had 'worked aggressively behind the scenes' to push the story.&quot;

Some had suggested, the Times article continued, that Axelrod had &quot;an even more significant role -- that he leaked the initial story.&quot;

This time, Obama's little helpers have not only thrown a bomb into the Republican primary, but are hoping to destroy the man who deprives the Democrats of their only argument in 2012: If you oppose Obama, you must be a racist.

www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47438

[blugiant]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek.
</div></div>
intarestinn argument


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a &quot;gold-digger,&quot; that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's &quot;hired muscle.&quot;</div></div>

gold digger. mii wandar iff dat y oyinbo rucsh tart fe cawl ar &quot;buy a lick&quot;

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This time, Obama's little helpers have not only thrown a bomb into the Republican primary, but are hoping to destroy the man who deprives the Democrats of their only argument in 2012: If you oppose Obama, you must be a racist.</div></div>


strange dat sellouts wass tartinn fe gitt likkle blakk traction ann oyinbo oomen tartinn fe sey sellout sexuallee harrass dem

[RichD]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">tink pon diss da blakk sellout cain was runninn a very strong campaign ann sum poll tarted to show dat imm was startinn fe gain blakk support at de xxpense aff de mixxed race man. den awl aff a sudden allegation affs aff sexual harrassment against de blakk sellout tarted fe gain traction inn oyinbo media

woo oonnoo tink respansible fe smearinn da blakk sellout ann y? </div></div>

the same ones who smiling wid him and embracing him are the ones smearing him </div></div>


natt sure cah iff yu xxamine diss dem oyinbo canservative peeps defendinn cain


even rush tat fe mekk funn aff one aff cain blonde accuser by call ar &quot;buy a lick&quot; </div></div>



the same ones who yuh a big up for defending him are the same ones who cutting his throat.....dem a mek a big show in the media of outrage but behind closed doors.....

[Tulip]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the same ones who yuh a big up for defending him are the same ones who cutting his throat.....dem a mek a big show in the media of outrage but behind closed doors..... </div></div>

Amen!

There is no mastermind twisting his mustache and hatching a scheme to get Cain. Obama got a pass, but hell would freezer over before the only two choices for POTUS with a possibility of winning were black. One person alone is not behind Cain's dirt hitting the street.

Also, I wouldn't place too much emphasis on who lived where in these 50 states - six degrees of separation and usually zero.

[blugiant]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">tink pon diss da blakk sellout cain was runninn a very strong campaign ann sum poll tarted to show dat imm was startinn fe gain blakk support at de xxpense aff de mixxed race man. den awl aff a sudden allegation affs aff sexual harrassment against de blakk sellout tarted fe gain traction inn oyinbo media

woo oonnoo tink respansible fe smearinn da blakk sellout ann y? </div></div>

the same ones who smiling wid him and embracing him are the ones smearing him </div></div>


natt sure cah iff yu xxamine diss dem oyinbo canservative peeps defendinn cain


even rush tat fe mekk funn aff one aff cain blonde accuser by call ar &quot;buy a lick&quot; </div></div>



the same ones who yuh a big up for defending him are the same ones who cutting his throat.....dem a mek a big show in the media of outrage but behind closed doors..... </div></div>

sah mii studee histaree soo wen mii see da same game beinn repeated mii raise qwestian ann mii doan defend demonkkkrats ar republikkkan racist politrrixx

look pon uncle clarence wen dem demonkkkrats neva waan imm fe gitt canfirm dem gitt anita hill fe smear clarence. now sellout cain gaininn blakk support at mixxed race man xxpense ann awl aff a sudden sexual harrassment smear aff a blakk cum bakk again

look att oww &quot;liberal media&quot; versus &quot;canservative media&quot; coverinn de sexual harrassment allegation. canservative media a qwestian dem oomen motive wild liberal media a sey cain ann republikkans ar dismiss sexual harrassment as sintinn oomen mekk upp. games ar beinn played ann de end resullts iss da dem usinn racist histaree aff blakk men as sexual predator

high tech lynchinn a gawn

[RichD]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
sah mii studee histaree soo wen mii see da same game beinn repeated mii raise qwestian ann mii doan defend demonkkkrats ar republikkkan racist politrrixx

look pon uncle clarence wen dem demonkkkrats neva waan imm fe gitt canfirm dem gitt anita hill fe smear clarence. now sellout cain gaininn blakk support at mixxed race man xxpense ann awl aff a sudden sexual harrassment smear aff a blakk cum bakk again

look att oww &quot;liberal media&quot; versus &quot;canservative media&quot; coverinn de sexual harrassment allegation. canservative media a qwestian dem oomen motive wild liberal media a sey cain ann republikkans ar dismiss sexual harrassment as sintinn oomen mekk upp. games ar beinn played ann de end resullts iss da dem usinn racist histaree aff blakk men as sexual predator

high tech lynchinn a gawn </div></div>

boy yuh buy into the Right wing talk hook line and sinker. yuh on the talking points distribution list?

[blugiant]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tulip</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the same ones who yuh a big up for defending him are the same ones who cutting his throat.....dem a mek a big show in the media of outrage but behind closed doors..... </div></div>

Amen!

There is no mastermind twisting his mustache and hatching a scheme to get Cain. Obama got a pass, but hell would freezer over before the only two choices for POTUS with a possibility of winning were black. One person alone is not behind Cain's dirt hitting the street.

Also, I wouldn't place too much emphasis on who lived where in these 50 states - six degrees of separation and usually zero.

</div></div>

yu mekk a great pint dat obama versus cain electshans wood friten oyinbo butt still mii wood luve fe see mixxed rave man versus sellout.

cain sey imm brothers fram anadda mother is da koch brothers soo imm ave sum powerfull peeps behind imm

now to de main pint diss countree ave lang histareeave a lang aff paintinn blakk men as sexual predators fe play racist politrixx so fe ignore histaree doan mekk sense. mii knoo yu doan beeleeve dem allegations against cain juss poppinn upp. de demonkkrats used sexual harrassment fe smear clarence raddar dan challenge imm qualification. sum aff cain position scare mii badd butt dat doan mean oyinbo shood play dat sexual harrassment blakk men as sexual predator fe smear cain

[blugiant]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
sah mii studee histaree soo wen mii see da same game beinn repeated mii raise qwestian ann mii doan defend demonkkkrats ar republikkkan racist politrrixx

look pon uncle clarence wen dem demonkkkrats neva waan imm fe gitt canfirm dem gitt anita hill fe smear clarence. now sellout cain gaininn blakk support at mixxed race man xxpense ann awl aff a sudden sexual harrassment smear aff a blakk cum bakk again

look att oww &quot;liberal media&quot; versus &quot;canservative media&quot; coverinn de sexual harrassment allegation. canservative media a qwestian dem oomen motive wild liberal media a sey cain ann republikkans ar dismiss sexual harrassment as sintinn oomen mekk upp. games ar beinn played ann de end resullts iss da dem usinn racist histaree aff blakk men as sexual predator

high tech lynchinn a gawn </div></div>

boy yuh buy into the Right wing talk hook line and sinker. yuh on the talking points distribution list?


</div></div>

doan buy inna rite ar leff ting onlee buy inna blakk ting dat y mii defendinn da blakk man. yu knoo mii made arguments fe defend uncle clarence againsy oyinbo racist smear too butt mii final argument iss dat imm wass noo good fe blakks

mii juss defendinn da blakk side

[RichD]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
doan buy inna rite ar leff ting onlee buy inna blakk ting dat y mii defendinn da blakk man. yu knoo mii made arguments fe defend uncle clarence againsy oyinbo racist smear too butt mii final argument iss dat imm wass noo good fe blakks

mii juss defendinn da blakk side </div></div>

so why yuh breaking it down along partisan lines?

[Tulip]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blakkgiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
yu mekk a great pint dat obama versus cain electshans wood friten oyinbo <span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">butt still mii wood luve fe see mixxed rave man versus sellout.
</span></span>
cain sey imm brothers fram anadda mother is da koch brothers soo imm ave sum powerfull peeps behind imm

now to de main pint diss countree ave lang histareeave a lang aff paintinn blakk men as sexual predators fe play racist politrixx so fe ignore histaree doan mekk sense. mii knoo yu doan beeleeve dem allegations against cain juss poppinn upp. de demonkkrats used sexual harrassment fe smear clarence raddar dan challenge imm qualification. sum aff cain position scare mii badd butt dat doan mean oyinbo shood play dat sexual harrassment blakk men as sexual predator fe smear cain </div></div>

I don't find that black men in this country are often portrayed as sexual predators. Lazy, dumb, violent, and roughish - yes. Sexual predators - no. White men have the lockdown on that profile like mass murder.

I personally don't care for Clarence Thomas. I think if someone was really planning to successfully keep him out of The Supreme Court, they could have come with a much better plot. Who plays this my word against his word bs if they are really playing to win?

I understand that you'd like to see &quot;mixxed rave man&quot; versus &quot;sellout&quot;, but they are still just two black men here. You're not going to see it in the US. Maybe they can put on a show like that for you at home.

[RichD]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

what you think of this?:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">According to the Drudge report and other sources Curt Anderson, Tony Frabrizo, and Chris Wilson of the Perry campaign may be behind the smear campaign against Herman Cain.</div></div>

[X]

Re: woo smearinn herman cain?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">what you think of this?:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">According to the Drudge report and other sources Curt Anderson, Tony Frabrizo, and Chris Wilson of the Perry campaign may be behind the smear campaign against Herman Cain.</div></div> </div></div>

just more of Perry's prints at a &quot;crime scene&quot; littered with his DNA...