The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

[Peasie]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why is this American/Jamaican of Lebanese extraction named after British 'royal' princes? </div></div>

Philip and George are very common Lebanese names even in present-day Lebanon and they are of Greek origin.

Those British 'royal' names were copied from the great civilizations of the Middle East

[Derek]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Peasie</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why is this American/Jamaican of Lebanese extraction named after British 'royal' princes? </div></div>

Philip and George are very common Lebanese names even in present-day Lebanon and they are of Greek origin.

Those British 'royal' names were copied from the great civilizations of the Middle East </div></div>


Yes, but Edward, Philip, George ALL TOGETHER TODAY in one person's name seems to imply a very serious lean towards something other than great civilisations of the Middle East.

[mountaingal]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah_yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the topic starter wrote of british royal bloodlines...not italian </div></div>

your question was &quot;which royal prince?&quot;, not which nationality. the borgia's were the equivalent of italian royalty.

portia, by the way, was athe heroine in shakespeare's merchant of venice. it would appear miss simpson's parents had a fondness for literature set in italy.

[RichD]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Yes, but Edward, Philip, George ALL TOGETHER TODAY in one person's name seems to imply a very serious lean towards something other than great civilisations of the Middle East. </div></div>

he was hardly named today...he is 81 years old in 1930 they were still close to the roots

[X]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

Abdullah Burja, Ahmadou Bamba, Mohammed Ben Abu Bekr, Aesop, Ahmed Baba, Sahle Maryam, Mutato....

[RichD]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

the illuminati only operate in the west....

[Derek]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Yes, but Edward, Philip, George ALL TOGETHER TODAY in one person's name seems to imply a very serious lean towards something other than great civilisations of the Middle East. </div></div>

he was hardly named today...he is 81 years old in 1930 they were still close to the roots </div></div>

You know what I mean by 'today'.

81 years ago can't compare to great civilisations of the Middle East can it.

[X]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

so in other words, baby Eddie born, look to his mom and goes
&quot;google, gaga, glee&quot;
His father ask, &quot;what did he say&quot;
and his mother responds &quot;he says to name him Edward Philip George&quot;


Edward Seaga did not choose his name, so to agrue the man allign himself based off the name bestowed on him by is parents borders on ludicrus..

[RichD]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Yes, but Edward, Philip, George ALL TOGETHER TODAY in one person's name seems to imply a very serious lean towards something other than great civilisations of the Middle East. </div></div>

he was hardly named today...he is 81 years old in 1930 they were still close to the roots </div></div>

You know what I mean by 'today'.

81 years ago can't compare to great civilisations of the Middle East can it.
</div></div>

but 81 years ago his parents were British Subjects..with no thoughts of breaking from the empire...nothing strange about them choosing names like that.

[Derek]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: xKs</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so in other words, baby Eddie born, look to his mom and goes
&quot;google, gaga, glee&quot;
His father ask, &quot;what did he say&quot;
and his mother responds &quot;he says to name him Edward Philip George&quot;


Edward Seaga did not choose his name, so to agrue the man allign himself based off the name bestowed on him by is parents borders on ludicrus..

</div></div>

No HE didn't choose it but the people who did knew what they were choosing, is the point I'm trying to make.

Ludicrous of you to think I'm implying Seaga aligned himself against his own name.

[Derek]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

How come so many people of <span style="text-decoration: underline">apparent obscurity</span> often get thrust into prominent positions on the world stage?

[X]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: xKs</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so in other words, baby Eddie born, look to his mom and goes
&quot;google, gaga, glee&quot;
His father ask, &quot;what did he say&quot;
and his mother responds &quot;he says to name him Edward Philip George&quot;


Edward Seaga did not choose his name, so to agrue the man allign himself based off the name bestowed on him by is parents borders on ludicrus..

</div></div>

No HE didn't choose it<span style="font-weight: bold"> but the people who did knew what they were choosing, </span>is the point I'm trying to make.

Ludicrous of you to think I'm implying Seaga aligned himself against his own name. </div></div>

figures.. so if its agreed that his PARENTs chose his name, then whats the point of this discussion??

Maybe we should be discussing the BIBLICAL names given to the millions of Jamaican babies then

By the way.. from wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek

<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">Derek </span>is a male name. It is the English language short form of Dederik, the Low German form of the name Theoderic. Theoderic is an <span style="font-weight: bold">old Germanic</span> name with an original meaning of &quot;people-ruler&quot;...
..The English form of the name arises in the 15th century, via import from the Low Countries. <span style="font-weight: bold">The native English (Anglo-Saxon) </span>form of the name was Deoric or Deodric, from Old English Þ&amp;#275;odr&amp;#299;c, but this name had fallen out of use in the medieval period</span>

[sistactry]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

[Derek]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: xKs</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: xKs</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so in other words, baby Eddie born, look to his mom and goes
&quot;google, gaga, glee&quot;
His father ask, &quot;what did he say&quot;
and his mother responds &quot;he says to name him Edward Philip George&quot;


Edward Seaga did not choose his name, so to agrue the man allign himself based off the name bestowed on him by is parents borders on ludicrus..

</div></div>

No HE didn't choose it<span style="font-weight: bold"> but the people who did knew what they were choosing, </span>is the point I'm trying to make.

Ludicrous of you to think I'm implying Seaga aligned himself against his own name. </div></div>

figures.. so if its agreed that his PARENTs chose his name, then whats the point of this discussion??

Maybe we should be discussing the BIBLICAL names given to the millions of Jamaican babies then

By the way.. from wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek

<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">Derek </span>is a male name. It is the English language short form of Dederik, the Low German form of the name Theoderic. Theoderic is an <span style="font-weight: bold">old Germanic</span> name with an original meaning of &quot;people-ruler&quot;...
..The English form of the name arises in the 15th century, via import from the Low Countries. <span style="font-weight: bold">The native English (Anglo-Saxon) </span>form of the name was Deoric or Deodric, from Old English Þ&amp;#275;odr&amp;#299;c, but this name had fallen out of use in the medieval period</span>


</div></div>

With respect...

I am talking about THREE (not one) names that each has high relevance within British/European aristocracy. Three names given to one person.
Check out the names of former and current British/Euro aristocracy.

If Seaga was:

Phillip, Leroy Michael. OK.
George Derek, Brian. Fine.
Edward, Kevin, Marcus. Yeah.


But the <span style="text-decoration: underline">prominent</span> names in British/Eurorpean Royalty are: George, Edward, Philip, Arthur, Henry and Charles.

And this guy has half of them. Carefully chosen is what I'm trying to say.


Selected before he was even born.

[Wahalla]

Re: The Right Honourable Edward Philip George Seaga

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: xKs</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: xKs</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so in other words, baby Eddie born, look to his mom and goes
&quot;google, gaga, glee&quot;
His father ask, &quot;what did he say&quot;
and his mother responds &quot;he says to name him Edward Philip George&quot;


Edward Seaga did not choose his name, so to agrue the man allign himself based off the name bestowed on him by is parents borders on ludicrus..

</div></div>

No HE didn't choose it<span style="font-weight: bold"> but the people who did knew what they were choosing, </span>is the point I'm trying to make.

Ludicrous of you to think I'm implying Seaga aligned himself against his own name. </div></div>

figures.. so if its agreed that his PARENTs chose his name, then whats the point of this discussion??

Maybe we should be discussing the BIBLICAL names given to the millions of Jamaican babies then

By the way.. from wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek

<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">Derek </span>is a male name. It is the English language short form of Dederik, the Low German form of the name Theoderic. Theoderic is an <span style="font-weight: bold">old Germanic</span> name with an original meaning of &quot;people-ruler&quot;...
..The English form of the name arises in the 15th century, via import from the Low Countries. <span style="font-weight: bold">The native English (Anglo-Saxon) </span>form of the name was Deoric or Deodric, from Old English Þ&amp;#275;odr&amp;#299;c, but this name had fallen out of use in the medieval period</span>


</div></div>

ah this explains alot.. Derek was named so as to be a ruler by the bloodline mafia.. just show how ineffective they are at selecting and putting people into power......

Given that Seaga was only prime minister for 8 years and only won one of 5 contested election seems that the theory lacks substance