Re: Whites and Welfare - GOP and the Food Stamp Fallac
I dont understand yankis...
I cannot understand how it is veiwed that heath care at point of use without payment is not the ideal...it follows IMHO much the same as the Hippocratic oath... do no harm, and help those in need. How can u have a situation that care is determined by where u work ??
In Jamaica there is a tacit acknowledgement that we cannot afford to provide it. Ask a direct question to any poltican as "should heath care be free" the answer would be yes..
In the UK despite the Thatcher Decade there is an acknowledgement that the ideal should be the post war social contract of "free at point of use". All sides of the poltical spectrum acknowledge this...They also acknowledge that life is less than ideal so there has to be compromise.. In fact there is at election time a blame game to say by each poltical party that they will invest more in national health service .. I know I can see my doctor if my children has a cold without having to fork out a penny.. I had four or five people who had serious conditions (one was in hospital for 18 months a bus driver on close to minimum wage.. ) no payment.
The only nay sayers against the national health service is a miniscual minority...
Heath is part of the infrastructure of a nation as much as roads and education.. I cannot imagine or even understand the US situation.... Aids SAR chicken Flu are all clear and present danger to a nations security. The only way these issues can be addressed is through a national policy, with emphersis on preventative medicine.. Child heath care ???????
I dont understand yankis...
I cannot understand how it is veiwed that heath care at point of use without payment is not the ideal...it follows IMHO much the same as the Hippocratic oath... do no harm, and help those in need. How can u have a situation that care is determined by where u work ??
In Jamaica there is a tacit acknowledgement that we cannot afford to provide it. Ask a direct question to any poltican as "should heath care be free" the answer would be yes..
In the UK despite the Thatcher Decade there is an acknowledgement that the ideal should be the post war social contract of "free at point of use". All sides of the poltical spectrum acknowledge this...They also acknowledge that life is less than ideal so there has to be compromise.. In fact there is at election time a blame game to say by each poltical party that they will invest more in national health service .. I know I can see my doctor if my children has a cold without having to fork out a penny.. I had four or five people who had serious conditions (one was in hospital for 18 months a bus driver on close to minimum wage.. ) no payment.
The only nay sayers against the national health service is a miniscual minority...
Heath is part of the infrastructure of a nation as much as roads and education.. I cannot imagine or even understand the US situation.... Aids SAR chicken Flu are all clear and present danger to a nations security. The only way these issues can be addressed is through a national policy, with emphersis on preventative medicine.. Child heath care ???????

Comment