blakk church v. obama funnee tand

[blugiant]

sum blakk minister ar tellinn dem congreation natt to vote cah aff mixxed race man support aff homosexualitee. dem tellinn dem congregation dat natt votinn is a way fe show dem displeasure ova de choice aff supportinn mixxed race homo friendlee agenda ar supportinn romney ova imm affiliation widd de racist mormon church. given de realitee dat widdout strong ann overwhelminn blakk support de mixxed race man will lose. iff mixxed race man lose 3 ar 4 parcent aff blakk vote ann iff blakk doan tunn out inn iigh numbah.

so wat oonnoo tink bout blakk ministers advisinn dem congregation dat natt votinn iss a way fe show dem displeasure widd de mixxed race man pushinn homosexual agenda. mixxed race man media supporters ar bunninn fiyah pon dem misiters

wat oonnoo tink bout diss

[RichD]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

since the black vote is 14% of the total ..3 or 4 % of the black vote = < 1 % of the total.

is this enough to influence outcome in states with high black Population.

it would be meaningless in NY CA IL

[kia027]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

i would say the churches doing this are playing right into the republicans hands.. If the republicans had known the black church would say this, they would not have gotten so busy with voter suppression tactics

What people forget is that a president is running a country not a church.

[Emperah]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

mi agree wid dem.
If dem nah support yuh, why support dem.
Obama decided not to accept an invitation from de naacp to appear and speak and so did romney. But dem outdeh wid de hispanics and de gay ppl dem.

[Gen]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

better yet they should vote for willard. help put him in office since his policies will have no effect on them.

[blugiant]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">since the black vote is 14% of the total ..3 or 4 % of the black vote = &lt; 1 % of the total.

is this enough to influence outcome in states with high black Population.

it would be meaningless in NY CA IL </div></div>

richd yu canfuse pon merikkan politrixx like moas peeps. doan view itt as a popular elecsham ting cah itt natt reallee bout de total vote

yu affii tekk itt inn cantext aff de twoo partee system ann dee electoral college cah blakk overwhelminnlee vote demonkkkrat. tree ar four percent aff de blakk vote iss more dan 3 ar 4 parcent aff de demonkkrats total.

wen yuh chattinn bout de state widd iigh republikkan population, yu missinn de pint cah itt oww blakk influence de swing states dat de real issue. de swing state ar dose widd enuff electoral vote fe crown de winner. fla, nc, ohio, penn fe name a few. dat y inn dose states dem passinn voter id laws widd likkle to no eveedence aff voter fraud to limit blakk ann latino votes

look pon de last mayoral eeleekkshan inn nyc, de mixxed race ann demonkkrats neva supported de blakk man runninn pon de demonkkkrat line. imm lost surprisinglee elekksham dat imm cood ave gotten easilee won iff de demonkkrats raise more money fe imm fe gitt out de blakk vote. mixxed race man even chided wan aff imm oyinbo demonkkkrat critics dat imm wood ave wann iff imm add runned. itt natt meaninnless iff yuh ovatand dat oyinbo vote iss split ann ow blakk vote sway de eelekkshan. even inn majaritee red states, de blakk vote forces republikkan fe invest more resources. dat y de republikkan goal iss tryinn fe gitt 5 percent aff de total blakk vote cah dat wood ensure dem victoree. y yuh tink dem wass pushinn cain fore dem realized dat cain reallee add a chance fe winn cah de oyinbo republikkan vote wass split among so manee oyinbo

oyinbo total vote iss usuallee split widd de republikkan ooldinn a sight edge. lationo vote iss usuallee split 60- 40 demonkkrats ann lead to small republikkan lead. blakk vote overwhelminn fe demonkkrats so wen blakk tunn out heavee demonkkrats usuallee winn dat de histaree aff de vote. dat y de republikkans cleverelee try fe limit blakk vote widd dem voter id laws cah heavee blakk tunn out badd fe republikkan. itt bout chippinn away a small percentage aff de blakk vote. lite blakk tunn out badd fe demonkkkrats cah iff de blakk base iss natt energized less blakk tunn out fe vote ann even iff dose blakks wey tunn out vote overwhelminnnlee fe demonkkkrats. a two ar tree percent lower blakk tunn out can lead to demonkkrats losinn. dat y demonkkkrats desparatelee need de blakk vote. itt juss dem blakk misleaders fail fe use de power dat inn dem aands.

[blugiant]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kia</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i would say the churches doing this are playing right into the republicans hands.. If the republicans had known the black church would say this, they would not have gotten so busy with voter suppression tactics

What people forget is that a president is running a country not a church. </div></div>

dat de same argument de demonkkkrats supporters aff de mixxed race man usinn dat dem playinn inna de republikkan aands. sum aff de demonkkkrats even wander iff dose blakk church leaders ar gittinn sintinn pon de side fe tellinn blakk peeps dat natt votinn fe eiddar iss an option.

sum demonkkrats see gittinn blakk ministers to inform dem congregation about natt votinn fe eiddar iss a part aff de republikkkans' voter suppression tactics

yet mixxed race man peeps injekked god inna dem party line dat sum demonkkkrats qwestianinn

kia natt votinn iss a way fe blakk peeps fe show dem displeasure widd boat de mixxed race man ann rumney as de two options. so y iss itt a negative ting iff blakk ministers raise itt a stateegee against votinn fe lesser aff two evil option. y iss itt playinn inna de republikkans aands cah dat imply dat blakk peeps bettar aff undar de demonkkkrats thumb?

[blugiant]

Re: blakk church v. obama funnee tand

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Emperah</div><div class="ubbcode-body">mi agree wid dem.
If dem nah support yuh, why support dem.
Obama decided not to accept an invitation from de naacp to appear and speak and so did romney. But dem outdeh wid de hispanics and de gay ppl dem. </div></div>

yu remind aff wan aff de jlp politrixxstah wey lost bawlinn bout oww imm gitt dem fe build good road fe imm peeps butt dem neva vote fe imm cah dem neva gitt none aff jabs fram buildinn de road.

politrixx iss bout publixx resources ar redistreebuteed. so iff politrixxstahs nah chatt bout blakk intarest, y blakk peeps fe support anee aff dem?

naacp luv funnee oyinbo money fram way bakk dat y dem neva mekk dem membership vote pon bowinn. dat y mii gave upp mii membarship inn dat a lang thyme ago. rumney spoke att de naacp ann dem boo imm ann dat improve imm tandinn among oyinbo. naacp bowinn ann dem addar blakk ministers wey mekkinn funne argument fe support homosexualitee juss providinn cover fe mixxed race man politrixx bowinn