I been folllowing this one...

[Wahalla]

Suspects In Bunting Burglary To Be Questioned







Published: Tuesday April 2, 2013 | 1:08 pm0 Comments



Opposition Spokesperson on National Security, Delroy Chuck

1 2 >

Charges could be brought against two persons now in police custody in relation to Saturday's incident involving the National Security Minister, Peter Bunting.

It was initially reported that Bunting and a companion were held up and robbed by thieves who brandished knives at them at a villa in Portland.

But Bunting has rejected the report saying it was a burglary and the items stolen belonged to friends he had gone to visit.

Head of the Police Area Two, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ealan Powell told the Gleaner/Power 106 News Centre this morning that the persons in custody will be questioned today with a view to bringing charges against them.

The Opposition Jamaica Labour Party has called for a full investigation into Saturday night’s incident noting that it remains unconvinced the country has been told the full story.

Opposition Spokesperson on National Security, Delroy Chuck has claimed that he has been told by reliable sources that Bunting was held up.

[j-kid]

Wouldn't yuh lie tuh, if yuh was di Security Minister ah di country an dem mugg yuh? If yuh caa protect yuhself an yuh hav more resources dan di regular everyday smaddi, yuh naa goh shame fi admit it?

[j-kid]

EDITORIAL - Does Bunting get it?

Published: Tuesday | April 2, 2013
Peter Bunting just doesn't get it. He might not have felt threatened by whatever it is that happened at that Portland villa, but the rest of us in Jamaica are damned frightened.Perhaps he should ask Donnette Archer. On Good Friday, her husband, Gregory, decided to take a leisurely morning walk with his nine-year-old son.
It is the kind of things people do - or ought to be able to do. It is the kind of things fathers do with their sons; what we preach, they should do.
Well, Gregory Archer didn't make it back home. He was shot dead by gunmen near to Vale Royal, the prime minister's official residence. This happened in full view of Gregory Archer's nine-year-old son.
In all likelihood, Gregory Archer will become just another homicide statistic; one of more than 1,000 people who will be murdered in Jamaica this year, of which the police will 'clear up' perhaps one-third, but for which far fewer arrests will be made and very few will make it to the courts.
WEAVING WEBS
But that's not the kind of thing that Peter Bunting, Jamaica's minister of national security, seems to get. He, however, seems to get spin and obfuscation.
So, our goodly minister parses, wiggles, shimmies, quivers and squirms. Or, so it appears.
We have no reason, however, to believe that the minister prevaricates.
What we know is that it matters little whether Peter Bunting himself was actually held up at that Portland villa, or his friends were. Many people actually are. Some of them, like Gregory Archer, are shot dead.
Even if the villa was merely burgled, as Mr Bunting explains, he should perhaps be glad that the thieves were gone by the time his friends investigated. For they, too, might have been added to Jamaica's homicide statistics.
Mr Bunting is right to feel badly for his friends, but not because they were even from Jamaica.
His concern should be for every single victim of crime in Jamaica. And as the man in charge, he must work with the technical people on policies and strategies to deal with a national crisis that reflects itself, in part, in a murder rate of more than 40 per 100,000 Jamaicans.
SOLUTION BY COVER-UP
Denying and pretending are not policies. They won't change the dynamic of crime in Jamaica or the statistics on the ground.
They certainly won't help Peter Bunting meet his target of a homicide rate of 12 per 100,000 by 2016. That would mean Jamaica slashing the number of murders in four years to around 327 from 1,084 last year.
On its current trajectory, that homicide rate can be achieved somewhere between 2037 and 2040. Merely blowing hot, obfuscatory air at the crisis won't change a thing.
If Peter Bunting wants to make a difference, he must begin with a full and honest engagement of the Jamaica people. He has to feel and know their fear. Even a little bit. This can't be an aloof, intellectual exercise in which the minister is not fully invested.

The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: [email protected] or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.http://www.jamaicans.com/forums/newr...5380&noquote=1

[Gen]

what reason him have fi lie about the details behind the robbery ?

maybe in his mind is not reallllllllllllllly robbery unless the smaddy chap yuh pan tap a it or shoot yuh ???

dwl mi know it nuh funny but had to laff

[RichD]

wonder if is a undercover move him di deh pan why his security guy would not have been close by

[Gen]

wah kinda undercover ting suh ?


him guh check him ting outa porty? cause dat would explain the sketchy details

wonder if is a undercover move him di deh pan why his security guy would not have been close by

[RichD]

wah kinda undercover ting suh ?


him guh check him ting outa porty? cause dat would explain the sketchy details

or him rendezvous in porty wid somebody else ting

[jah_yout]

Bunting: why should i care? The Chinese community is fine

[Gen]

or him rendezvous in porty wid somebody else ting

[remo]

or him rendezvous in porty wid somebody else ting

hole on a minute ...Where is my wife?

[blugiant]

what reason him have fi lie about the details behind the robbery ?

maybe in his mind is not reallllllllllllllly robbery unless the smaddy chap yuh pan tap a it or shoot yuh ???

dwl mi know it nuh funny but had to laff

mekk yuh wandar woo dem wass deer fe meet widd. wandar iff dem go deer fe sintinn unclean so dem hand nuh kleen so dem a try fe dismiss itt fore da ooole storee cum out