Rioting in Sweden
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Wahalla View Posthttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22650267The rise of the right-wing Sweden Democrats party, which has called for a curfew in response to the violence, has polarised Swedes. The polls show most people still favour immigration though the majority is diminishing.
The Swedish riots have similarities with those in London two years ago and in Paris in 2005 - an incident triggered widespread attacks on property, although there is no evidence of looting in Stockholm as there was in London.
A nursery school in Kista was among buildings set alight by youths
But there does seem to be a particular Swedish problem. The country had a reputation for generosity and an especially welcoming attitude but now something is clearly going wrong.
Aje Carlbom, a social anthropologist at Malmo University, said the government needed to accept that immigrants arriving without an adequate education were likely to remain unemployed.
He said: "Maybe a lot of money should be invested in second- and third-generation immigrants, to make sure they learn Swedish. The parents' generation, I think, unfortunately, is probably a lost cause in terms of integration."
Why should developed countries take in people that are clearly a burden to society and the citizens that reside in that country? Especially when there are not enough low level jobs to employ these uneducated immigrants.
And they thank the countries that take them in by rioting and destroying property?
Anti-immigration and resentment on both sides is the only thing that is accomplished when poorly thought out immigration programs are implemented.Last edited by lonewolf; 05-26-2013, 09:16 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lonewolf View PostImmigration does not seem to work anywhere where hosts countries accept the uneducated.
Why should developed countries take in people that are clearly a burden to society and the citizens that reside in that country? Especially when there are not enough low level jobs to employ these uneducated immigrants.
And they thank the countries that take them in by rioting and destroying property?
Anti-immigration and resentment on both sides is the only thing that is accomplished when poorly thought out immigration programs are implemented.
cah aff oyinbo countrees low birth rate dem need immigration fe maintain dem tandards aff livinn fe oyinbo through da xxploitation aff immigrants. fe try fe use an eeleetists argument bout poor uneducated immigrants fe xxcuse oyinbo racism nuh rite. immigrants lead to economic growth ann iff dem gitt ridd aff awl aff dem oyinbo tandards aff livinn wood decrease ann den itt wood be oyinbo protestinn ann since oyinbo usuallee more violent dat wood lead to biggar chubble.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lonewolf View PostImmigration does not seem to work anywhere where hosts countries accept the uneducated.
Why should developed countries take in people that are clearly a burden to society and the citizens that reside in that country? Especially when there are not enough low level jobs to employ these uneducated immigrants.
And they thank the countries that take them in by rioting and destroying property?
Anti-immigration and resentment on both sides is the only thing that is accomplished when poorly thought out immigration programs are implemented.
In any case I do not know from the article that is was the immigrants who are rioting and further the level of education they have.
To the extent that the rioters antecedents are of Swedes, who are not natural born. I would wager that they are very likely second generation offspring's of an earlier wave of Immigrants and are therefore Swedish Citizens and can no longer be considered Immigrants.
Comment
-
-
Tuffy there is always this issue.. it is not the first generation of immigrants that seem to have the riot... it is the second generation or those who were socailised by the metropole countryand more likely than not they are now citizen of the metropole country..... There are exceptions of course...
Comment
-
-
Dispute
Originally posted by lonewolf View PostImmigration does not seem to work anywhere where hosts countries accept the uneducated.
Why should developed countries take in people that are clearly a burden to society and the citizens that reside in that country? Especially when there are not enough low level jobs to employ these uneducated immigrants.
And they thank the countries that take them in by rioting and destroying property?
Anti-immigration and resentment on both sides is the only thing that is accomplished when poorly thought out immigration programs are implemented.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by queenb View PostAnd how much education did the immigrants from Ireland and Italy have when they swamped the immigration roles in the early part of the 20th century? The uneducated and disenfranchised people from every country are the majority of citizens who emigrate and seek a better life in a new and supposedly democratic world. Those with education are usually afforded status in their home country and find no reason to leave.
As an immigrant myself it makes me upset to see what some folks think about us. My family has never received as much as a red cent from the state. My father worked his butt off, paid his taxes and eventually built his own business and hired others to work for him, and they too paid taxes. He was what some may call "uneducated" but he was willing to work hard and do jobs that many Canadians were not willing to do. Today his grandchildren are all either going to college or working in their chosen careers, all contributing to help pay for the social programs that so called multi-generational Canadians enjoy and take for granted.Last edited by My Looh; 05-26-2013, 06:28 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by queenb View PostAnd how much education did the immigrants from Ireland and Italy have when they swamped the immigration roles in the early part of the 20th century? The uneducated and disenfranchised people from every country are the majority of citizens who emigrate and seek a better life in a new and supposedly democratic world. Those with education are usually afforded status in their home country and find no reason to leave.Last edited by lonewolf; 05-27-2013, 09:18 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lonewolf View PostThat was a different time and era. The US was a fairly new industrialized nation that needed cheap labor to work in factories. Capitalism follows cheap labor and the US does not have a need for cheap labor in the 21st century because these jobs have been sent over seas to poor underdeveloped countries. There are not enough jobs for US citizens. Why accept immigrants into countries when employment is simply nonexistent? It does not make any sense.
the Swedes acknowledge they need immigrants. And the Norwegian even more so. (they are short literally a million people)... given their low birth rate.. Yes they need low skill workers to do the low level jopbas that locals dont want, the hewers of wood and haulers of water... cleaners... general labouring... .. much like despite the fact the is 56 % youth unemployment in spain, they need people to pick cucumbers in the plastic tunnels...
The issue is that the first generation were restricted by language culture and Xenophobia..(yeah in Scandinavia) . now the subsequent generation has come of age and dont see the world from the immigrant paradigm.... This generation by gradual degratation tacit inaction on the part of the authoroties was given the worst of the social benefit... If the praise of the Swedish education system is true then these rioters are well educated...Course they are not rioting this was set up by Swedish intelligence services...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by blugiant View Postjoke ting diss
cah aff oyinbo countrees low birth rate dem need immigration fe maintain dem tandards aff livinn fe oyinbo through da xxploitation aff immigrants. .
And the reason oyinbo birth rate is down is because most(NOT ALL) oyinbo are responsible citizens and they know that children are expensive. They choose not to have children that they cannot feed...something other races should learn before they compulate. Don't know of many oyinbo that have baby mama.
Home » Immigration Issues » Labor and Economics
Labor and Economics
Immigration, Poverty and Low-Wage Earners: The Harmful Effect of Unskilled Immigrants on American Workers (2011)
The U.S. has a responsibility to protect the economic interests of all of its citizens, yet the immigration system, which adds hundreds of thousands to the labor force each year, is bringing in workers faster than jobs are being created. Moreover, only a small portion of admissions are based on skills or educational criteria, creating an enormous glut of low-skilled workers who struggle to rise above poverty.
Low Immigration and High Economic Growth (2011)
America's experience with a low level of immigration shows that we do not need mass immigration to have economic growth.
The Truth About Employment-Based Immigration (2011)
Although big business likes to claim that our present high level of immigration is necessary for its survival and the robustness of our economy, the fact is that only a small fraction of today's million plus new green cards issued annually go to highly-skilled workers.
Lower Wages for American Workers (2010)
Mass immigration drives down wages and working conditions.
Immigration and Welfare (2010)
Immigrant use of welfare programs is 43 percent higher than non-immigrants' use.
Immigration and Job Displacement (2010)
Mass immigration displaces U.S. workers with foreign workers willing to work for lower wages.
The Costs to Local Taxpayers for Illegal Aliens (2008)
Summary fiscal cost estimates by state amount to $36.6 billion dollars annually for providing public K-12 education, incarceration and emergency medical care for illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Wahalla View Postthe Swedes acknowledge they need immigrants. And the Norwegian even more so. (they are short literally a million people)... given their low birth rate.. Yes they need low skill workers to do the low level jopbas that locals dont want, the hewers of wood and haulers of water... cleaners... general labouring... .. much like despite the fact the is 56 % youth unemployment in spain, they need people to pick cucumbers in the plastic tunnels...
The issue is that the first generation were restricted by language culture and Xenophobia..(yeah in Scandinavia) . now the subsequent generation has come of age and dont see the world from the immigrant paradigm.... This generation by gradual degratation tacit inaction on the part of the authoroties was given the worst of the social benefit... If the praise of the Swedish education system is true then these rioters are well educated...Course they are not rioting this was set up by Swedish intelligence services...
Please explain why and what benefit the Swedish government would gain by staging riots?
Are you serious or being facetious?
Comment
-
-
ads
Collapse
Comment