Tweet
dem seh dem use chemical weapons so nuff chatter a gwaan
-
-
of course kemikals was use, de ones de US gi de rebels.
Like we haven't seen dis movie played over and over again -
Comment
-
Nah, not this time. Regardless, if the rest of the world does not intervene, why should the US care.Originally posted by Emperah View Post
We are not the world police... Get a vote. Russia will kill any intervention. Blame it on Russia. End of story.
US does the world's dirty work (and our own) everyone else does nothing but b*tch and moan about what US does or does not do...We should stay out of it. No win situation.
If US gets involved, US troops will find weapons supplied by US to rebels being used against US troops in next intervention. (where ever that may be)Comment
-
U.S. Missile Strikes Against Syria Could Happen as "Early as Thursday"
Secretary of State John Kerry made it clear yesterday that American action in Syria is now a matter of when and not if. Thanks to NBC News, we now have an idea of when that when might be:
Missile strikes against Syria could be launched "as early as Thursday," senior U.S. officials said Tuesday as the White House intensified its push toward an international response to the suspected use of chemical weapons. The "three days" of strikes would be limited in scope, and aimed at sending a message to the regime of Syria President Bashar Assad, U.S. officials told NBC News. ...
The U.S. officials reiterated that any military action would not aim to kill Assad and would be limited because the goal would be to respond to the use of chemical weapons. Command and control bunkers, airfields and artillery would be targeted.
Complicating an already complicated situation, however, is the fact that the U.N. team of inspectors investigating the alleged (and almost certain) chemical-weapon attacks is still on the ground in Syria and isn't scheduled to leave until Sunday. The unnamed U.S. officials, somewhat confusingly, told NBC that an attack is unlikely while the inspectors remains in Syria—comments that left it unclear whether that means the plan would be to pull them out early or to simply wait.
The report comes one day after Kerry declared that it was "undeniable" that the Assad regime had used chemical weapons in Syria, and promised that the Obama administration will hold the government there accountable for what he called a "moral obscenity."
Comment
-
Is this the same U.S.A. that dropped a bomb on a crowed resturant full of innocent civilians to begin the Iraq war because they thought Sadam was there?
Is this the same U.S.A. that used depleted uranium bombs and dropped them indiscriminately all over Iraq?
Is this the same U.S.A. that bombed a defenseless city(Falluja) to smithereen(major war crime)
give me a break the hawks wanted war now they have itComment
-
I don't think there will be troops on the ground if they do anything...Out of Many One People Online
http://www.jamaicans.comComment
-
I hope the US but out.Comment
-
60% of Yankees are against striking Syria...U.S. has no U.N. approval and no facts as to who did this crime
Comment
-
mi hope russia dash supm aftah dem tuh, dem way outtahdah wid dem liyadness.Comment
-
1044509_649253721759881_792369681_n.jpg
U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
- Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying 'the idea is approved by Washington'
- Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was 'totally unacceptable'
By Louise Boyle
PUBLISHED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013 | UPDATED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam's Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
It reads: 'Phil... We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
'We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
'They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
'Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
'Kind regards, David.'
Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to MailOnline.
Enlarge
Leaked: The email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor regarding a 'Washington approved' chemical attack in Syria which could be blamed on Assad's regime
The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumés and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.
Dave Goulding's Linkedin profile lists him as Business Development Director at Britam Defence Ltd in Security and Investigations. A business networking profile for Phil Doughty lists him as Chief Operationg Officer for Britam, United Arab Emirates, Security and Investigations.
The U.S. State Department had not returned a request for comment on the alleged emails to MailOnline today at time of publication.
However the use of chemical warfare was raised at a press briefing in D.C. on January 28.
A spokesman said that the U.S. joined the international community in 'setting common redlines about the consequences of using chemical weapons'.
Countless losses: Families attempt to identify the bodies of Syrian fighters shot and dumped in a river in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo today
Devastation: People gather at a site hit by what activists said was missiles fired by a Syrian Air Force fighter jet from forces loyal to Assad, at the souk of Azaz, north of Aleppo on January 13
A leaked U.S. government cable revealed that the Syrian army more than likely had used chemical weapons during an attack in the city of Homs in December.
The document, revealed in The Cable, revealed the findings of an investigation by Scott Frederic Kilner, the U.S. consul general in Istanbul, into accusations that the Syrian army used chemical weapons in the December 23 attack.
More...
Comment
-
An Obama administration official who had access to the document was reported as saying: 'We can't definitely say 100 per cent, but Syrian contacts made a compelling case that Agent 15 was used in Homs on Dec. 23.'
Mr Kilner's investigation included interviews with civilians, doctors, and rebels present during the attack, as well as the former general and head of the Syrian WMD program, Mustafa al-Sheikh.
Dr. Nashwan Abu Abdo, a neurologist in Homs, is certain chemical weapons were used. He told The Cable: 'It was a chemical weapon, we are sure of that, because tear gas can't cause the death of people.'
Threats: Barack Obama said during a speech last month that if Syria used chemical weapons against its own people it would be 'totally unacceptable'
Tyrant: Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, pictured with his wife Asma, is facing increasing international pressure over his brutal massacre of his own people
Eye witness accounts from the investigation revealed that a tank launched chemical weapons and caused people exposed to them to suffer nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, delirium, seizures, and respiratory distress.
The symptoms suggest that the weaponized compound Agent-15 was responsible. Syria denied using chemical weapons and said it would never use them against citizens.
Speaking to Pentagon reporters at the time, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said his biggest concern was how the U.S. and allies would secure the chemical and biological weapons sites scattered across Syria and ensure the components don't end up in the wrong hands if the regime falls, particularly under violent conditions.
Government forces and rebels in Syria have both been accused by human rights groups of carrying out brutal warfare in the 22-month-old conflict, which has claimed more than 60,000 lives.
WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT : 'SYRIAN REBELS TESTING CHEMICAL WEAPONS
ON RABBITS'Comment
-
I haven't look pan all a dis yet
The US used chemical weapons in Iraq - and then lied about it: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ov/15/usa.iraq
In 2007 4 Star General Wesley Clark Blew Whistle:
U.S government Plans Wars with 7 countries including Syria> http://bit.ly/yyYFjV, http://bit.ly/vOcXX9
MUST WATCH : Published on Mar 19, 2013 -Syrian Chemical Weapons And The Propaganda Spin Campaign > http://bit.ly/1dnt25Z- Press For Truth
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syria, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.
>http://ind.pn/1fgY1w8
Why weren't this claim ever mentioned or investigated?
This war has been planned for some time:
Staged attack to start the war with Syria:
http://www.storyleak.com/obama-syria-war-over-staged-chemical-attack/
Should the UN also be investigating the Rebels over these chemical attacks?
They did it before: Syrian rebels used Sarin nerve gas, not Assad’s regime: U.N. official http://bit.ly/15kJznr
According to the U.N. investigation the March 19th chemical weapons attack turned out to be committed by the rebels:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188
Turkey finds sarin gas in homes of suspected Syrian Islamists
Comment
-
obama & the people who gave him a peace prize should be paralyzed with shame....all i see is war & more war...
and the anti-war movement seems dead...forget about any anti-war voice from "black" people...they used to be the conscience of the nation but now it seems many of them have joined the beast;
sad state of affairsComment
-
how come none a dem a bawl when de zionist dem lick out palestine yute sem wid phosphorous inna dem weapony a bun out de ppl from de inside an all dese devils said nuttin, but dem have big mout now.
Comment
Comment