you are taking a play from the johnnycakes play book now.
so did the couple really go for dinner 20 times and now only go for dinner 16 times?
Rich, I used to think you just played stupid, but?
Correct me if I'm wrong. (again it's all about facts) I believe that is called an analogy?
Can you disprove any of this?
Even though the deficit is falling, it is still on track to exceed the highest shortfall ever recorded before Barack Obama came along. The deficit of $455 billion seen in fiscal 2008 is almost 30 percent lower than the projected full-year fiscal 2013 deficit of $642 billion the Congressional Budget Office estimated in May.
As to how the deficit has "dropped at the fastest rate in 60 years," that's only true because no other administration in history has run even a single trillion-dollar fiscal year shortfall, let alone four in a row
It seems that you can't. I know you have checked and tried to disprove this. You would not miss that chance. I'm sure your inability to disprove the info really gets your panties in a knot. DWL
Rich, don't go away mad. Just go away if you can't disprove a fact. The truth will set you free.
Rich, I used to think you just played stupid, but?
Correct me if I'm wrong. (again it's all about facts) I believe that is called an analogy?
Can you disprove any of this?
It seems that you can't. I know you have checked and tried to disprove this. You would not miss that chance. I'm sure your inability to disprove the info really gets your panties in a knot. DWL
Rich, don't go away mad. Just go away if you can't disprove a fact. The truth will set you free.
And anyway, why shoot the messenger?
this is that part that is unprovable:
that's only true because ....
its nuanced but i should know aht has no place in political debate.
if somebody made this claim :
"The deficit of $455 billion seen in fiscal 2008 is almost 30 percent lower than the projected full-year fiscal 2013 deficit of $642 billion the Congressional Budget Office estimated in May."
and then added the opinion that this was because of prudent fiscal management
What's a credible news source CNBC, FOX etc? If the information is based on fact, it's credible, regardless of the source.
You could at least post something that proves it wrong. If it's wrong, by all means POST THE FACTS.
If you can't prove it's wrong it only proves that you are spouting off at the mouth and making a fool of yourself.
It's a very simple game. Put up or shut up.
How do you know these are the facts?...This is the point I was trying to make...Take everything you get from these sources with a grain of salt but then again never mind it must be a conservative web site and we all know everything they say is gospel
.
It's spin, it's smoke and mirrors, it's more fuzzy math, more lies. The truth is...
Even though the deficit is falling, it is still on track to exceed the highest shortfall ever recorded before Barack Obama came along. The deficit of $455 billion seen in fiscal 2008 is almost 30 percent lower than the projected full-year fiscal 2013 deficit of $642 billion the Congressional Budget Office estimated in May.
As to how the deficit has "dropped at the fastest rate in 60 years," that's only true because no other administration in history has run even a single trillion-dollar fiscal year shortfall, let alone four in a row.
This kind of statement is analogous to one we might hear from a spendthrift couple carrying excessive debt who had been going to fine-dining restaurants ten times per month. If they suddenly decided to increase their frequency to 20 and then "cut back" to 16, they might brag that "We've economized by more than we ever have!" No one would take such an argument seriously. We shouldn't take the argument being made by Obama, his administration and his party seriously either. What the AP and the rest of the press should be doing is exposing how singularly unserious this president is about fiscal responsibility.
more spin cah da reason fe moas aff da deficit iss intarest payment dat de mixxed race man inherited added to awl da spendinn fe bail out da financial sector.
nah lie mixxed race man shood natt ave fallawed bush lead ann bailed out wall street
dem might sey that is not what its all about .....but their frontmen sey....
“America Needs a White Republican President,” opines: “Admit it. You want a white Republican president again. Wanting a white Republican president doesn’t make you racist, it just makes you American.”
In a nutshell... for conservative Republicans to have full control of the White House, majority lead in the Senate seat, and full control of the House of Representatives.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment