fiyah pon maddaratars ann admonstaratars

[blugiant]

so waah gawn

lang thyme mii doan bunn fiyah pon oonnoo

oonnoo decide fe tart upp widd oonnoo foolishness again

lockinn dunn peeps tredds again

oonnoo doan like peace

iff oonnoo lock dunn peeps tredd send dem message y oonnoo do itt

[Tropicana]

I hear you. It recently happened to me. Used to be that threads were locked down because one broke rules. Now it seems all that is required is for a moderator or admin to disagree with your POV or opinions.

I don't defend slackness and never will. I guess I am supposed to say "rock on". Seems my views are not compatible with those who do. If something is wrong and unscriptural, I call it for what it is. I have never seen anything in the rules saying that is not permitted but it is enough to get one branded as "self-righteous" and to justify the locking down of discussions and then boasting about it in the shoutbox. I notice that there are very few Christians left here. Diplomat...but he rarely appears. The others have all vamooshed.

[j-kid]

Why don't you bi balanced an also give di Admins, and Mods credit fi those time dat dem support yuh right tuh free speech, no matter how dem may personally/individually disagree wid wha yuh saying? I know fi ah fact dat dem ALL have.

[Peasie]

Hi Blu,

Are you talking about the cat vomit thread I moved to News & Politics from Pon Di Verandah? Sorry about that. I moved it because it wasn't too verandahish. I'm trying to maintain that forum as far as its purpose is to be chit-chatty and fun .. like your Sundae threads.

Peace an Love Inna Di Dancehall,

Peasie

[blugiant]

Hi Blu,

Are you talking about the cat vomit thread I moved to News & Politics from Pon Di Verandah? Sorry about that. I moved it because it wasn't too verandahish. I'm trying to maintain that forum as far as its purpose is to be chit-chatty and fun .. like your Sundae threads.

Peace an Love Inna Di Dancehall,

Peasie

okay cah mii look fi mii tread ann cood natt find itt ann facecee tanya tell mii fii look fe in in da section mii poas itt ann lock dunn mii tredd twice. so diss was remindinn peeps respect due

mi tink dat oyinbo nyaminn sinting aff da floor cah imm thaught itt was grape nutt was joke ting. plus oyinbo ooman chat bout itt natt okay fe nyam aff da floor iff tree secand pass warrant discussion

awl rite peasie den dat cool

[blugiant]

I hear you. It recently happened to me. Used to be that threads were locked down because one broke rules. Now it seems all that is required is for a moderator or admin to disagree with your POV or opinions.

I don't defend slackness and never will. I guess I am supposed to say "rock on". Seems my views are not compatible with those who do. If something is wrong and unscriptural, I call it for what it is. I have never seen anything in the rules saying that is not permitted but it is enough to get one branded as "self-righteous" and to justify the locking down of discussions and then boasting about it in the shoutbox. I notice that there are very few Christians left here. Diplomat...but he rarely appears. The others have all vamooshed.

christian entitled to dem opinions even iff mii disagree widd certain parts aff christianitee

itt natt wat dem cawl yuh butt wat yuh anwsar to

funnee peeps cawl mii homophobic even dough dem kno mii nuh fraid aff annee aff dem so mii doan care

[blugiant]

Why don't you bi balanced an also give di Admins, and Mods credit fi those time dat dem support yuh right tuh free speech, no matter how dem may personally/individually disagree wid wha yuh saying? I know fi ah fact dat dem ALL have.

mii veree fair ann balanced dat y mii doan bunn fiyah pon dem widdout just cause

respekk due dat awl mii seyinn

[Tropicana]

Fair and balanced J-Kid? On here, it is okay to post dirty jokes, photos of half naked and naked women (as long as it is not full frontal) and close-ups of men and dem crotches (not picking on you just saying). Not one of the mods have a problem wid dat.
But pon baggy dropping sluts, slutty attire, herds of heffahs and slackness and there is a possee (including some mods and an admin) who descend pon you like a pack a vulchas dung a dungle.



The goal is seems is to provoke a reaction and build a case to run me off the board.

Last I checked the words slutty and slut were not banned on board lane. If they were, they would be blocked.
If some a de mods and admins think they should be, they should build a case wid Xavier fi dat.

The latest is that when you try to take the discussion back to the topic, you are branded self-righteous and "trying to make yourself look better than other people" and your thread is locked dung.

http://jamaicans.com/forums/showthread.php?78740-Dating-Timeline-Anyone-Else-agree-this-is-much-too-Aggressive

The most shocking part is being branded "unChristian" for defending Christian values. What a sinting!!!!! What kind a madness is that? The Bible is REALLY clear that women are to dress modestly and fornication is a sin. Slackness is not a positive thing. It is not to be tolerated. Slipping moral values will have a negative impact on ANY society and it is important to pon dat. If doing so is against the rules (and I have checked them, it is not) this needs to be clarified.

The other thing I see get censored and locked down is anything against nassee dogs. It seems only dawg lovahs are allowed to express their POV.

If someone is not breaking rules, why constantly hijack their threads (which by the way IS against board rules) and why lock dung a thread because the thread holder and this does not support your POV, lifesytle or both.



I have moderated many forums going back as afar as Geocities days and imposing your opinions on others and silencing those that disagree and trying to run them off the board is not usually one of the duties of a moderator or an admin. Above all, moderators and admins are supposed to be impartial.