Re: Selfish oomens who decide to breed widdout a husban
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kia</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't think it is selfish in some cases. What I think for a woman who decides to have a child on her own is that she has thought about it long & hard enough and has hopefully had counseling along with a support system which includes a father figure. For those who have done this and I do know some women who have the child is thriving and doing well.
Michael Jackson was a single parent, but he could afford the support system his children need to help them grow. </div></div>
Rethinking this Kia...now that you had mentioned MJ..
I don't think it would be PC now for me to go into what we are hearing...and you will admit that this scenario is waaay out, strange, different and even unfathomable to many; from what we have been hearing, if it's true, and I have no reason to doubt.
Now I can't help but *chukkle* when the news is out that HE IS NOT EVEN THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER...THAT RIVALS THE UNMARRIED, SINGLE WOMAN WHO HAS AI seriously, the ones that I am talking about...
So for you to cite him as an example of a "good" single parent" when he married a woman, got into some arrangement for her to have the children of his doctor has me really wondering what you are/were trying to say. To top it off, he divorces the woman, and BINGO!! cuts her out of the will..[and oh yes, I heard that he provided for the children, but duh!!!]
I don't think you should have used him as an example KIA...and MJ is still my dearly beloved. I wish the kids all the best.
Now, just this morning I was talking with a fellow, and guess who he mentioned?
OCTOMOM!!!....
Octomom who they say is whacky in the head, like a few others...see where I am going with this?
Still yet, THIS HAD THE STAMP OF APPROVAL FROM SOCIETY AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION, which as I said before, getting their stamp of approval, doesn't make it RIGHT ..Society has approved many atrocities in the past, so?
<span style="font-style: italic">Surrogating is another...being paid to carry a child</span>
<span style="font-style: italic">MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEYYYY...</span>
Now what is going to happen to those children?
Did she know that she would end up with 8 kids? Puh-leeze.. </div></div>
Clarification Britisha: I said MJ was a single parent who could afford the support system needed for his kids. I did not say he was an example of a great single parent but a person who chose to parent and was able to afford the support the kids need.
btw mi think a time this move to parenting noh?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kia</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't think it is selfish in some cases. What I think for a woman who decides to have a child on her own is that she has thought about it long & hard enough and has hopefully had counseling along with a support system which includes a father figure. For those who have done this and I do know some women who have the child is thriving and doing well.
Michael Jackson was a single parent, but he could afford the support system his children need to help them grow. </div></div>
Rethinking this Kia...now that you had mentioned MJ..
I don't think it would be PC now for me to go into what we are hearing...and you will admit that this scenario is waaay out, strange, different and even unfathomable to many; from what we have been hearing, if it's true, and I have no reason to doubt.
Now I can't help but *chukkle* when the news is out that HE IS NOT EVEN THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER...THAT RIVALS THE UNMARRIED, SINGLE WOMAN WHO HAS AI seriously, the ones that I am talking about...
So for you to cite him as an example of a "good" single parent" when he married a woman, got into some arrangement for her to have the children of his doctor has me really wondering what you are/were trying to say. To top it off, he divorces the woman, and BINGO!! cuts her out of the will..[and oh yes, I heard that he provided for the children, but duh!!!]
I don't think you should have used him as an example KIA...and MJ is still my dearly beloved. I wish the kids all the best.
Now, just this morning I was talking with a fellow, and guess who he mentioned?
OCTOMOM!!!....
Octomom who they say is whacky in the head, like a few others...see where I am going with this?
Still yet, THIS HAD THE STAMP OF APPROVAL FROM SOCIETY AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION, which as I said before, getting their stamp of approval, doesn't make it RIGHT ..Society has approved many atrocities in the past, so?
<span style="font-style: italic">Surrogating is another...being paid to carry a child</span>

Now what is going to happen to those children?
Did she know that she would end up with 8 kids? Puh-leeze.. </div></div>
Clarification Britisha: I said MJ was a single parent who could afford the support system needed for his kids. I did not say he was an example of a great single parent but a person who chose to parent and was able to afford the support the kids need.
btw mi think a time this move to parenting noh?
Comment