Re: Earthquake - Image of the fault line image..not comfort
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[quote=monk]
well if there is anything that is clear, people will resort to superstition and gentle brainwashing and cultural indoctrinations.
some pathetic segment of the population can not come to grips with the fact of evolution and literally believe their bible. ironically benefitting from advances in science strictly attributable to that which they choose not to believe in.
but anyway to each their own, it just sucks when those people shrouded in ignorance have an effect that is felt beyond their personal sphere.
a couple of these, maintained in a fleet...seems like sound policy to adopt. an ounce of prevention.
<span style="font-weight: bold">Just as how some pathetic segment of the planet cannot fathom that the Bible must be fulfilled</span>
How's that?
Leave people to believe what they want to belive or NOT believe...you are NO authority on anything, NO one is for that matter...the truth of the matter is, there is worse to come IMO...disasters that have the propensity to make this civilization EXTINCT...no matter how prepared a nation is...and the disaser might just be MANMADE..
like bio-terrorism for starters..*I* rest my case..
<span style="font-weight: bold">Que sera, sera....well unless we REPENT..
</span> </div></div>
well britisha, all due respect, but with a little studying it quickly becomes apparent how the bible has descended to us, and being an 'authority' on the subject is pretty easy.
unfortunately, it did not come to us in a fed ex package from God, so it's far from immune to criticism. and if people claim it should be followed, they should be able to defend their claims without spinning off into some self created sense of offense.
So there isn't any reason to place any more stake in what it claims- especially when we can logically deduce authoritatively, that a lot of the things it claims are not true, and were set down by people who were not really in touch with God, but were pretty frakking ignorant. You can't make animals breed offspring of different colors by showing them the color you want their kids to be while they're seeding each other, for example.
We also know a bit about the early Christian church, and learning more. So we know there were competing end times scenarios- in one of them Jesus pulls Peter aside and gives him the equivalent of a shhhhhhhhh....don't tell them this, but we all get in. but if they find out now, they won't behave.
This text was used by large segments of the early church, but then it got set aside for John's.
Nobody has ever once seen or measured God's influence on any piece of scripture to be worthy of belief or discarded as not what he meant. Why do we accept so easily that God wants to be so mysterious about things which are so important, are matters of eternal life and death in fact. Early Church communities often used several different gospels than the four canonicals- so what then, Jesus was okay with them being at jeopardy of hell and dying in faulty understanding for a couple hundred years or so? Come on.
I agree with you to a point, I don't particularly care what myths people follow or structure their culture and lives from- in fact I recognize that Myth is intrinsic and one of our most important vehicles for understanding and coming to grips with archetypal problems. I thoroughly enjoy the rich panoply of mythic and spiritual systems. But I do think a line should be drawn when people start to harm others, deny others self evident rights, etc, based on what are in essence unprovable fairy tales whch they irrationally and pathetically cling to. I don't think you consider the bible to be literal do you?
If you do I don't mean you any offense, but it's time to engage the scholarship which will free your mind from such superstition. I believe people have a moral duty to do so, and not contribute to the propagation of soft lies that often bear damaging fruit. The whole "holy" land comes to mind.
Should we all stand by while Hale Bop cult killed themselves? I don't think anyone would suggest that people who were through no fault of their own born into that cult or conditioned by that cult, should suffer so.
Do we stand by and let Jews and Moslems slaughter each other, or do we justify the Crusades or Holocausts because people were just believing in what they wanted to believe and should be left alone?
What about people who still think sickness and illness are caused by demons and devils that can be driven out, and when they aren't their kids die?
What about people who think Haiti made a pact with the devil and so they got their just due and shouldn't be helped...
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: britisha</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[quote=monk]
well if there is anything that is clear, people will resort to superstition and gentle brainwashing and cultural indoctrinations.
some pathetic segment of the population can not come to grips with the fact of evolution and literally believe their bible. ironically benefitting from advances in science strictly attributable to that which they choose not to believe in.
but anyway to each their own, it just sucks when those people shrouded in ignorance have an effect that is felt beyond their personal sphere.
a couple of these, maintained in a fleet...seems like sound policy to adopt. an ounce of prevention.
<span style="font-weight: bold">Just as how some pathetic segment of the planet cannot fathom that the Bible must be fulfilled</span>
How's that?

Leave people to believe what they want to belive or NOT believe...you are NO authority on anything, NO one is for that matter...the truth of the matter is, there is worse to come IMO...disasters that have the propensity to make this civilization EXTINCT...no matter how prepared a nation is...and the disaser might just be MANMADE..

<span style="font-weight: bold">Que sera, sera....well unless we REPENT..

well britisha, all due respect, but with a little studying it quickly becomes apparent how the bible has descended to us, and being an 'authority' on the subject is pretty easy.
unfortunately, it did not come to us in a fed ex package from God, so it's far from immune to criticism. and if people claim it should be followed, they should be able to defend their claims without spinning off into some self created sense of offense.
So there isn't any reason to place any more stake in what it claims- especially when we can logically deduce authoritatively, that a lot of the things it claims are not true, and were set down by people who were not really in touch with God, but were pretty frakking ignorant. You can't make animals breed offspring of different colors by showing them the color you want their kids to be while they're seeding each other, for example.
We also know a bit about the early Christian church, and learning more. So we know there were competing end times scenarios- in one of them Jesus pulls Peter aside and gives him the equivalent of a shhhhhhhhh....don't tell them this, but we all get in. but if they find out now, they won't behave.
This text was used by large segments of the early church, but then it got set aside for John's.
Nobody has ever once seen or measured God's influence on any piece of scripture to be worthy of belief or discarded as not what he meant. Why do we accept so easily that God wants to be so mysterious about things which are so important, are matters of eternal life and death in fact. Early Church communities often used several different gospels than the four canonicals- so what then, Jesus was okay with them being at jeopardy of hell and dying in faulty understanding for a couple hundred years or so? Come on.
I agree with you to a point, I don't particularly care what myths people follow or structure their culture and lives from- in fact I recognize that Myth is intrinsic and one of our most important vehicles for understanding and coming to grips with archetypal problems. I thoroughly enjoy the rich panoply of mythic and spiritual systems. But I do think a line should be drawn when people start to harm others, deny others self evident rights, etc, based on what are in essence unprovable fairy tales whch they irrationally and pathetically cling to. I don't think you consider the bible to be literal do you?
If you do I don't mean you any offense, but it's time to engage the scholarship which will free your mind from such superstition. I believe people have a moral duty to do so, and not contribute to the propagation of soft lies that often bear damaging fruit. The whole "holy" land comes to mind.
Should we all stand by while Hale Bop cult killed themselves? I don't think anyone would suggest that people who were through no fault of their own born into that cult or conditioned by that cult, should suffer so.
Do we stand by and let Jews and Moslems slaughter each other, or do we justify the Crusades or Holocausts because people were just believing in what they wanted to believe and should be left alone?
What about people who still think sickness and illness are caused by demons and devils that can be driven out, and when they aren't their kids die?
What about people who think Haiti made a pact with the devil and so they got their just due and shouldn't be helped...
Comment